Treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy: Should the entire seminal vesicles be included in the clinical target volume?

被引:110
|
作者
Kestin, LL
Goldstein, NS
Vicini, FA
Yan, D
Korman, HJ
Martinez, AA
机构
[1] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
[2] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Pathol Anat, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
[3] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Urol, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; radiotherapy; prostatectomy; seminal vesicles;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(02)03011-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: When treating high-risk prostate cancer with radiation therapy, inclusion of the seminal vesicles (SVs) within the clinical target volume (CTV) can dramatically increase the volume of radiated normal tissues and hinder dose escalation. Because cancer may involve only the proximal portion of the frequently lengthy SVs, we performed a complete pathology review of prostatectomy specimens to determine the appropriate length of SV to include within the CTV when SV treatment is indicated. Methods and Materials: A detailed pathologic analysis was performed for 344 radical prostatectomy specimens (1987-2000). All slides from each case were reviewed by a single pathologist (N.S.G.). Factors recorded for each case included length of each SV (cm), length of cancer involvement in each SV (cm) measured from the prostate-SV junction, and percentage of SV length involved. Results: Fifty-one patients (15%) demonstrated SV involvement in 81 SVs (21 unilateral, 30 bilateral SV involvement). The median SV length was 3.5 cm (range: 0.7-8.5 cm). Factors associated with SV involvement included the pretreatment PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, and clinical T classification. The commonly used risk group stratification was very effective at predicting SV positivity. Only 1% of low-risk patients (PSA < 10 ng/mL, Gleason less than or equal to 6, and clinical stage less than or equal to T2a) demonstrated SV involvement vs. 27% of high-risk patients. Patients with only one high-risk feature still demonstrated a 15% risk of SV involvement, whereas 58% of patients with all three high-risk features had positive SVs. The median length of SV involvement was 1.0 cm (90th percentile: 2.0 cm, range: 0.2-3.8 cm). A median of 25% of each SV was involved with adenocarcinoma (90th percentile: 54%, range: 4%-75%). For the 81 positive SVs, no factor was associated with a greater length or percentage of SV involvement. In the entire population, 7% had SV involvement beyond 1.0 cm. There was an approximate 1% risk of SV involvement beyond 2.0 cm or 60% of the SV. In addition, this risk was less than 4% for all subgroups, including high-risk patients. Conclusions: A portion of the SV should be included in the CTV only for higher-risk patients (PSA 2:10 ng/mL, biopsy Gleason greater than or equal to 7, or clinical T stage greater than or equal to T2b). When treating the SV for prostate cancer, only the proximal 2.0-2.5 cm (approximately 60%) of the SV should be included within the CTV. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 697
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] When should the seminal vesicles be included in the target volume in prostate radiotherapy?
    Bayman, N. A.
    Wylie, J. P.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 19 (05) : 302 - 307
  • [2] Should Seminal Vesicles he Included in High Dose Clinical Target Volume in Radiation Treatment of Prostate Cancer?
    Parashar, Bhupesh
    Sabbas, Albert
    Nori, Dattatreyudu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2008, 31 (06): : 619 - 620
  • [3] RADIOTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE-CANCER - SHOULD THE SEMINAL-VESICLES BE CONSIDERED TARGET
    MARKS, LB
    ANSCHER, MS
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1992, 24 (03): : 435 - 440
  • [4] EVALUATING THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN RECTAL NORMAL TISSUE COMPLICATION PROBABILITY AND THE PORTION OF SEMINAL VESICLES INCLUDED IN THE CLINICAL TARGET VOLUME IN INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Gluck, Iris
    Vineberg, Karen A.
    Haken, Randall K. Ten
    Sandler, Howard M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 73 (02): : 334 - 340
  • [5] Evaluating the relationships between rectal complication probability (NTCP) and the portion of seminal vesicles (SV) included in the clinical target volume (CTV) for prostate cancer
    Vineberg, K. A.
    Gluck, I.
    Ten Haken, R. K.
    Sandler, H. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01): : S299 - S299
  • [6] Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy on Seminal Vesicles Reduction: Optimal Clinical Target Volume for the Seminal Vesicles in Localized Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy
    Qi, X.
    Gao, X.
    Li, F.
    Li, H.
    Zhao, B.
    Wang, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S437 - S437
  • [7] Radiotherapy Treatment Plans with RapidArc for Prostate Cancer Involving Seminal Vesicles
    Yoo, S.
    Wu, Q.
    Lee, W.
    Yin, F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [8] Clinical to planning target volume margins in prostate cancer radiotherapy
    Ramiandrisoa, F.
    Duverge, L.
    Castelli, J.
    Nguyen, T. D.
    Servagi-Vernat, S.
    de Crevoisier, R.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2016, 20 (6-7): : 629 - 639
  • [9] RADIOTHERAPY TREATMENT PLANS WITH RAPIDARC FOR PROSTATE CANCER INVOLVING SEMINAL VESICLES AND LYMPH NODES
    Yoo, Sua
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    Lee, W. Robert
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (03): : 935 - 942
  • [10] What margins should be added to the clinical target volume in radiotherapy treatment planning for lung cancer?
    Ekberg, L
    Holmberg, O
    Wittgren, L
    Bjelkengren, G
    Landberg, T
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 48 (01) : 71 - 77