Improving concentration measures used for evaluating air quality models

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, RF
Irwin, JS
机构
[1] Atmosph. Sciences Modeling Division, Air Resources Laboratory, Natl. Oceanic and Atmosph. Admin., Research Triangle Park, NC
[2] Off. of Air Qual. Plan. and Std., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC
[3] Atmosph. Sciences Modeling Division, ARL, NOAA (EPA, MD 14), Research Triangle Park
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY | 1997年 / 36卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<1107:ICMUFE>2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
An unfortunate difficulty in model evaluation is that the concentration measure that most models predict, namely the ensemble mean concentration under the plume centerline (or at some location relative to the plume centerline), cannot be measured directly. The problem can be ameliorated by judicious selection of a concentration measure against which to compare model predictions. Insufficient attention has been given in the past to the selection of an appropriate measure for use in air quality model evaluation studies, which may have resulted in biases in the results of those studies. Some studies have used the maximum concentrations along the arc (arc maximum) as the measure of choice. In this paper, the authors have considered two additional candidate measures, the fitted maximum concentrations and the near-centerline concentrations, which, intuitively, relate more closely to the ensemble mean concentrations. This study shows that the maximum concentrations along the arc are significantly higher than either the fitted maxima or the near-centerline concentrations. In addition, of the latter two measures, the authors conclude that use of the near-centerline concentration is preferable to the use of fitted maximum for the purposes of evaluating model performance.
引用
收藏
页码:1107 / 1112
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improving the Performance of Text Categorization Models Used for the Selection of High Quality Articles
    Kim, Seunghee
    Choi, Jinwook
    HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS RESEARCH, 2012, 18 (01) : 18 - 28
  • [32] Evaluating Alternative Exposure Metrics Used for Multipollutant Air Quality and Human Health Studies
    Oezkaynak, Haluk
    Isakov, Vlad
    Baxter, Lisa
    Graham, Stephen E.
    Sarnat, Stefanie Ebert
    Sarnat, Jeremy A.
    Mulholland, James
    Turpin, Barbara
    Rich, David Q.
    Lunden, Melissa
    AIR POLLUTION MODELING AND ITS APPLICATION XXII, 2014, : 65 - 71
  • [33] Models for evaluating city logistics measures
    Taniguchi, E
    Yamada, T
    Kakimoto, Y
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE EASTERN ASIA SOCIETY FOR TRANSPORTATION STUDIES, VOL 3, NO 2, 2001, : 511 - 526
  • [34] Simulation of aerosol dynamics: A comparative review of algorithms used in air quality models
    Zhang, Y
    Seigneur, C
    Seinfeld, JH
    Jacobson, MZ
    Binkowski, FS
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 31 (06) : 487 - 514
  • [35] Evaluating air quality with and without air fresheners
    Nigel Goodman
    Neda Nematollahi
    Giovanni Agosti
    Anne Steinemann
    Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2020, 13 : 1 - 4
  • [36] DEVELOPMENT OF A METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING AIR-POLLUTION OPTIONS FOR IMPROVING THE AIR-QUALITY IN MEXICO-CITY
    HARDIE, RW
    THAYER, GR
    BARRERAROLDAN, A
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 169 (1-3) : 295 - 301
  • [37] Evaluating air quality with and without air fresheners
    Goodman, Nigel
    Nematollahi, Neda
    Agosti, Giovanni
    Steinemann, Anne
    AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2020, 13 (01): : 1 - 4
  • [38] Towards Quality Measures for Evaluating Thesauri
    Kless, Daniel
    Milton, Simon
    METADATA AND SEMANTIC RESEARCH, 2010, 108 : 312 - 319
  • [39] Evaluating the quality of soil legacy data used as input of digital soil mapping models
    Lagacherie, Philippe
    Arregui, Maider
    Fages, David
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2024, 75 (02)
  • [40] Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Improving Air Quality Perception
    Herberger, Simone
    Ulmer, Heiko
    CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, 2012, 40 (06) : 578 - 585