Improving concentration measures used for evaluating air quality models

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, RF
Irwin, JS
机构
[1] Atmosph. Sciences Modeling Division, Air Resources Laboratory, Natl. Oceanic and Atmosph. Admin., Research Triangle Park, NC
[2] Off. of Air Qual. Plan. and Std., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC
[3] Atmosph. Sciences Modeling Division, ARL, NOAA (EPA, MD 14), Research Triangle Park
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY | 1997年 / 36卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<1107:ICMUFE>2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
An unfortunate difficulty in model evaluation is that the concentration measure that most models predict, namely the ensemble mean concentration under the plume centerline (or at some location relative to the plume centerline), cannot be measured directly. The problem can be ameliorated by judicious selection of a concentration measure against which to compare model predictions. Insufficient attention has been given in the past to the selection of an appropriate measure for use in air quality model evaluation studies, which may have resulted in biases in the results of those studies. Some studies have used the maximum concentrations along the arc (arc maximum) as the measure of choice. In this paper, the authors have considered two additional candidate measures, the fitted maximum concentrations and the near-centerline concentrations, which, intuitively, relate more closely to the ensemble mean concentrations. This study shows that the maximum concentrations along the arc are significantly higher than either the fitted maxima or the near-centerline concentrations. In addition, of the latter two measures, the authors conclude that use of the near-centerline concentration is preferable to the use of fitted maximum for the purposes of evaluating model performance.
引用
收藏
页码:1107 / 1112
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EVALUATING MEASURES OF PROGRAM QUALITY
    REDISH, KA
    SMYTH, WF
    COMPUTER JOURNAL, 1987, 30 (03): : 228 - 232
  • [22] Evaluating the role of clean heating technologies in rural areas in improving the air quality
    Li, Bojia
    Sun, Yujun
    Zheng, Wandong
    Zhang, Huan
    Jurasz, Jakub
    Du, Tao
    Wang, Yue
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2021, 289
  • [23] Advanced techniques for evaluating eulerian air quality models: Background and methodology
    Arnold, JR
    Dennis, RL
    Tonnesen, CS
    10TH JOINT CONFERENCE ON THE APPLICATIONS OF AIR POLLUTION METEOROLOGY WITH THE A&WMA, 1998, : 1 - 5
  • [24] Considerations about statistical indices used in the evaluation of air quality models
    Canepa, E
    Modesti, F
    AIR POLLUTION V, 1997, : 607 - 616
  • [25] Improving air quality
    2000, Cahners Bus Inf, Highlands Ranch, CO, USA (42):
  • [26] Improving air quality
    Holmes, Mark
    FILTRATION + SEPARATION, 2012, 49 (04) : 1 - 1
  • [27] Evaluating predictive quality models derived from software measures: Lessons learned
    Lanubile, F
    Visaggio, G
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 1997, 38 (03) : 225 - 234
  • [28] MEASURES FOR IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF AUTOPSIES
    KLOCHKOV, ND
    TIMOFEEV, IV
    ARKHIV PATOLOGII, 1992, 54 (02) : 73 - 74
  • [29] Improving Public Health Policies with Indoor Air Quality Predictive Models
    Posada Barrera, Ariel Isaac
    Rodriguez Peralta, Laura Margarita
    de Oliveira Nunes, Eldman
    Maia Sampaio, Paulo Nazareno
    Cuesta Astudillo, Fabian Leonardo
    2023 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, CSCI 2023, 2023, : 221 - 226
  • [30] Evaluating air quality through aerial demand function and an application evaluating air quality
    Li, Z. Z.
    Su, J. Q.
    BULGARIAN CHEMICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 49 : 47 - 52