Improving concentration measures used for evaluating air quality models

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, RF
Irwin, JS
机构
[1] Atmosph. Sciences Modeling Division, Air Resources Laboratory, Natl. Oceanic and Atmosph. Admin., Research Triangle Park, NC
[2] Off. of Air Qual. Plan. and Std., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC
[3] Atmosph. Sciences Modeling Division, ARL, NOAA (EPA, MD 14), Research Triangle Park
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY | 1997年 / 36卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<1107:ICMUFE>2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
An unfortunate difficulty in model evaluation is that the concentration measure that most models predict, namely the ensemble mean concentration under the plume centerline (or at some location relative to the plume centerline), cannot be measured directly. The problem can be ameliorated by judicious selection of a concentration measure against which to compare model predictions. Insufficient attention has been given in the past to the selection of an appropriate measure for use in air quality model evaluation studies, which may have resulted in biases in the results of those studies. Some studies have used the maximum concentrations along the arc (arc maximum) as the measure of choice. In this paper, the authors have considered two additional candidate measures, the fitted maximum concentrations and the near-centerline concentrations, which, intuitively, relate more closely to the ensemble mean concentrations. This study shows that the maximum concentrations along the arc are significantly higher than either the fitted maxima or the near-centerline concentrations. In addition, of the latter two measures, the authors conclude that use of the near-centerline concentration is preferable to the use of fitted maximum for the purposes of evaluating model performance.
引用
收藏
页码:1107 / 1112
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving concentration measures used for evaluating air quality models
    Lee, RF
    Irwin, JS
    NINTH JOINT CONFERENCE ON APPLICATIONS OF AIR POLLUTION METEOROLOGY WITH A&WMA, 1996, : 520 - 523
  • [2] New methods for evaluating meteorological models used in air quality applications
    Gilliam, Robert C.
    Hogrefe, Christian
    Rao, S. T.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 40 (26) : 5073 - 5086
  • [3] An exploration of the robustness of some common statistical measures for evaluating air quality models
    Chang, JS
    Lu, CH
    Wojcik, GS
    AIR POLLUTION V, 1997, : 453 - 463
  • [4] Shallow Discussion on Measures for Improving Indoor Air Quality
    Tang, Li
    Tang, Zhonghua
    ADVANCED BUILDING MATERIALS, PTS 1-4, 2011, 250-253 (1-4): : 2691 - 2694
  • [5] Improving urban air quality requires multimodal measures
    Grant, Christopher D.
    TR News, 2003, (227): : 22 - 25
  • [6] The State of the Air Quality and Measures for Improving it in North Korea
    Yeo, Min Ju
    Kim, Yong Pyo
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN SOCIETY FOR ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 35 (03) : 318 - 335
  • [7] A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING AIR-QUALITY MODELS
    VENKATRAM, A
    BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 1982, 24 (03) : 371 - 385
  • [8] PUBLIC PRIORITIES FOR EVALUATING AIR-QUALITY MANAGEMENT MEASURES
    DAVOS, CA
    THISTLEWAITE, W
    CLARK, CA
    SINSHEIMER, PJ
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1991, 33 (03) : 205 - 221
  • [9] AN ASSESSMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES FOR IMPROVING AIR-QUALITY
    ALBERSHEIM, SR
    TRANSPORTATION QUARTERLY, 1982, 36 (03): : 451 - 468
  • [10] EXPERIENCES IN EVALUATING REGIONAL AIR-QUALITY MODELS
    LIU, MK
    GREENFIELD, SM
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1986, 20 (04) : 749 - 755