Analysis of the impact of reticle CD variations on the available process windows for a 100nm CMOS process

被引:0
|
作者
Verhaegen, S
Vandenberghe, G
Jonckheere, RM
Ronse, KR
机构
来源
22ND ANNUAL BACUS SYMPOSIUM ON PHOTOMASK TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1 AND 2 | 2002年 / 4889卷
关键词
mask specifications; flexible mask specifications; OPC; writing grid; process window analysis; 193nm lithography;
D O I
10.1117/12.467915
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
With the decreasing gate length and pitch, line-width variations on the mask become more and more important. In low k1 imaging situations often a high Mask Error Enhancement Factor (MEEF) is present and optical proximity correction (OPC) is used to correct for printed CD variation through pitch. In such situations it is often not clear what the impact of reticle line-width variations is on the performance of the litho process and what the interaction is with other process variations present in the litho process. In this manuscript a method will be explained to derive the impact of the reticle CD deviations on the process windows for low k1 imaging. This method will allow varying the various reticle specifications: the CD mean-to-target and uniformity, the writing grid size and the pitch proximity effect during reticle fabrication. By varying these input parameters and looking at the corresponding process window reductions a more founded decision can de made about the specification for these parameters when ordering reticles. After explaining the method also a reality check will be done for a 100nm CMOS process with a modem 193nm resist on a high NA (63 and 0.75) ArF scanner.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 208
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Variation status in 100nm CMOS process and below
    Nagase, K
    Ohkawa, SI
    Aoki, M
    Masuda, H
    ICMTS 2004: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MICROELECTRONIC TEST STRUCTURES, 2004, : 257 - 261
  • [2] From feature scale simulation to backend simulation for a 100nm CMOS process
    Badrieh, F
    Puchner, H
    Heitzinger, C
    Sheikholeslami, A
    Selberherr, S
    ESSDERC 2003: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD EUROPEAN SOLID-STATE DEVICE RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2003, : 441 - 444
  • [3] Response surface modeling of 100nm CMOS process technology using design of experiment
    Srinivasaiah, HC
    Bhat, N
    17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VLSI DESIGN, PROCEEDINGS: DESIGN METHODOLOGIES FOR THE GIGASCALE ERA, 2004, : 285 - 290
  • [4] Radical nitridation in multi-oxide process for 100nm generation CMOS technology
    Yasuda, Y
    Kimizuka, N
    Watanabe, K
    Tatsumi, T
    Ono, A
    Fukasaku, K
    Imai, K
    Nakamura, N
    2001 SYMPOSIUM ON VLSI TECHNOLOGY, DIGEST OF TECHNICAL PAPERS, 2001, : 83 - 84
  • [5] Multivariate analysis of a 100nm process measured by in-line scatterometry
    Egret, S
    Furusho, T
    Baudemprez, B
    METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XVIII, PTS 1 AND 2, 2004, 5375 : 296 - 306
  • [6] Analysis of process variations' impact on a 2.4 GHz 90 nm CMOS LNA
    Gonzalez, J.
    Cruz, J.
    Vazquez, D.
    Rueda, A.
    2013 IEEE 4TH LATIN AMERICAN SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (LASCAS), 2013,
  • [7] Porous ILD process development for sub 100nm integration
    Malone, K
    Chen, ST
    Kumar, K
    Spooner, T
    Mehta, S
    McGahay, V
    Nye, H
    Tyberg, C
    Sankar, M
    Huang, E
    Lin, Q
    Fuller, N
    Dalton, T
    Hedrick, JC
    Tadashi, I
    ADVANCED METALLIZATION CONFERENCE 2003 (AMC 2003), 2004, : 469 - 475
  • [8] ESD Protection Design with Adjustable Snapback Behavior for 5-V Application in 100nm CMOS Process
    Wang, Chang-Tzu
    Chen, Yu-Chun
    Tang, Tien-Hao
    Su, Kuan-Cheng
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL RELIABILITY PHYSICS SYMPOSIUM (IRPS), 2013,
  • [9] Performance of ArF resist process for 100nm - DRAM full chip
    Shin, KS
    Kim, HS
    Jung, JC
    JOURNAL OF PHOTOPOLYMER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 15 (03) : 441 - 446
  • [10] Thermal Sensor Variation Reduction in Deep Sub 100nm Process Technologies
    Duarte, David E.
    Abdelmoneum, Mohamed
    Taylor, Greg
    2010 IEEE SENSORS, 2010, : 1382 - 1385