Deep Learning for Real -time, Automatic, and Scanner-adapted Prostate (Zone) Segmentation of Transrectal Ultrasound, for Example, Magnetic Resonance Imaging ?transrectal Ultrasound

被引:32
|
作者
van Sloun, Ruud J. G. [1 ]
Wildeboer, Rogier R. [2 ]
Mannaerts, Christophe K. [2 ]
Postema, Arnoud W. [2 ]
Gayet, Maudy [3 ]
Beerlage, Harrie P. [1 ,2 ]
Salomon, Georg [4 ]
Wijkstra, Hessel [1 ,2 ]
Mischi, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Lab Biomed Diagnost, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Urol, Shertogenbosch, Netherlands
[4] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin, Prostate Canc Ctr, Hamburg, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2021年 / 7卷 / 01期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Deep learning; Prostate cancer; Segmentation; Ultrasound magnetic resonance imaging? transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy; IN-BORE; BIOPSY; ANATOMY; BRACHYTHERAPY; FUSION; IMAGES; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2019.04.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Although recent advances in multiparametric magnetic resonance imag-ing (MRI) led to an increase in MRI-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion prostate biopsies, these are time consuming, laborious, and costly. Introduction of deep-learning approach would improve prostate segmentation. Objective: To exploit deep learning to perform automatic, real-time prostate (zone) segmentation on TRUS images from different scanners. Design, setting, and participants: Three datasets with TRUS images were collected at different institutions, using an iU22 (Philips Healthcare, Bothell, WA, USA), a Pro Focus 2202a (BK Medical), and an Aixplorer (SuperSonic Imagine, Aix-en-Provence, France) ultrasound scanner. The datasets contained 436 images from 181 men. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Manual delineations from an expert panel were used as ground truth. The (zonal) segmentation performance was evaluated in terms of the pixel-wise accuracy, Jaccard index, and Hausdorff distance. Results and limitations: The developed deep-learning approach was demonstrated to significantly improve prostate segmentation compared with a conventional automated technique, reaching median accuracy of 98% (95% confidence interval 95-99%), a Jaccard index of 0.93 (0.80-0.96), anda Hausdorff distance of 3.0 (1.3-8.7) mm. Zonal segmentation yielded pixel-wise accuracy of 97% (95-99%) and 98% (96-99%) for the peripheral and transition zones, respectively. Supervised domain adaptation resulted in retainment of high performance when applied to images from different ultrasound scanners (p > 0.05). Moreover, the algorithm's assessment of its own segmentation performance showed a strong correlation with the actual segmentation performance (Pearson's correlation 0.72, p < 0.001), indicating that possible incorrect segmentations can be identified swiftly. Conclusions: Fusion-guided prostate biopsies, targeting suspicious lesions on MRI using TRUS are increasingly performed. The requirement for (semi)manual prostate delineation places a substantial burden on clinicians. Deep learning provides a means for fast and accurate (zonal) prostate segmentation of TRUS images that translates to different scanners.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 85
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 3-Dimensional Elastic Registration System of Prostate Biopsy Location by Real-Time 3-Dimensional Transrectal Ultrasound Guidance With Magnetic Resonance/Transrectal Ultrasound Image Fusion
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Desai, Mihir M.
    Palmer, Suzanne
    Valencerina, Samuel
    Gross, Mitchell
    Abreu, Andre L.
    Aron, Monish
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (03): : 1080 - 1086
  • [32] Analyzing the learning curves of a novice and an experienced urologist for transrectal magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy
    Cata, Emanuel Darius
    Van Praet, Charles
    Andras, Iulia
    Kadula, Pierre
    Ognean, Razvan
    Buzoianu, Maximilian
    Leucuta, Daniel
    Caraiani, Cosmin
    Tamas-Szora, Attila
    Decaestecker, Karel
    Coman, Ioan
    Crisan, Nicolae
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (05) : 1956 - 1965
  • [33] Role of magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy and transrectal ultrasound in evaluation of prostatic pathologies with focus on prostate cancer
    Lahoti, Amol Madanlal
    Dhok, Avinash Parshuram
    Rantnaparkhi, Chetana Ramesh
    Rawat, Jitesh Subhash
    Chandak, Nihar Umakant
    Tawari, Hitesh Sharad
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 83 : E37 - E46
  • [34] LightCM-PNet: A lightweight pyramid network for real-time prostate segmentation in transrectal ultrasound
    Wang, Weirong
    Pan, Bo
    Ai, Yue
    Li, Gonghui
    Fu, Yili
    Liu, Yanjie
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2024, 156
  • [35] Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy Improves Cancer Detection Following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy and Correlates With Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Chung, Paul H.
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Baccala, Angelo A., Jr.
    Kruecker, Jochen
    Benjamin, Compton J.
    Xu, Sheng
    Yan, Pingkun
    Kadoury, Samuel
    Chua, Celene
    Locklin, Julia K.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Shih, Joanna H.
    Gates, Stacey P.
    Buckner, Carey
    Bratslavsky, Gennady
    Linehan, W. Marston
    Glossop, Neil D.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (04): : 1281 - 1285
  • [36] Magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion focal cryotherapy of the prostate: A prospective development study
    Valerio, Massimo
    Shah, Taimur Tariq
    Shah, Paras
    Mccartan, Neil
    Emberton, Mark
    Arya, Manit
    Ahmed, Hashim Uddin
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2017, 35 (04) : 150.e1 - 150.e7
  • [37] Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Transrectal Ultrasound in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Study With Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Zhang, Mingbo
    Tang, Jie
    Luo, Yukun
    Wang, Yiru
    Wu, Meng
    Memmott, Benjamin
    Gao, Jing
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (07) : 1823 - 1830
  • [38] Prostate volume estimations using magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound compared to radical prostatectomy specimens
    Paterson, Nicholas R.
    Lavallee, Luke T.
    Nguyen, Laura N.
    Witiuk, Kelsey
    Ross, James
    Mallick, Ranjeeta
    Shabana, Wael
    MacDonald, Blair
    Scheida, Nicola
    Fergusson, Dean
    Momoli, Franco
    Cnossen, Sonya
    Morash, Christopher
    Cagiannos, Ilias
    Breau, Rodney H.
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (7-8): : 264 - 268
  • [39] Fully Automated Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion via a Probabilistic Registration Metric
    Sparks, Rachel
    Bloch, B. Nicolas
    Feleppa, Ernest
    Barratt, Dean
    Madabhushi, Anant
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2013, 8671
  • [40] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Detect Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prior Negative Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsies
    Vourganti, Srinivas
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir
    Yerram, Nitin K.
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Volkin, Dmitry
    Hoang, An
    Turkbey, Baris
    Gupta, Gopal N.
    Kruecker, Jochen
    Linehan, W. Marston
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 188 (06): : 2152 - 2157