Deep Learning for Real -time, Automatic, and Scanner-adapted Prostate (Zone) Segmentation of Transrectal Ultrasound, for Example, Magnetic Resonance Imaging ?transrectal Ultrasound

被引:32
|
作者
van Sloun, Ruud J. G. [1 ]
Wildeboer, Rogier R. [2 ]
Mannaerts, Christophe K. [2 ]
Postema, Arnoud W. [2 ]
Gayet, Maudy [3 ]
Beerlage, Harrie P. [1 ,2 ]
Salomon, Georg [4 ]
Wijkstra, Hessel [1 ,2 ]
Mischi, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Lab Biomed Diagnost, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Urol, Shertogenbosch, Netherlands
[4] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin, Prostate Canc Ctr, Hamburg, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2021年 / 7卷 / 01期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Deep learning; Prostate cancer; Segmentation; Ultrasound magnetic resonance imaging? transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy; IN-BORE; BIOPSY; ANATOMY; BRACHYTHERAPY; FUSION; IMAGES; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2019.04.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Although recent advances in multiparametric magnetic resonance imag-ing (MRI) led to an increase in MRI-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion prostate biopsies, these are time consuming, laborious, and costly. Introduction of deep-learning approach would improve prostate segmentation. Objective: To exploit deep learning to perform automatic, real-time prostate (zone) segmentation on TRUS images from different scanners. Design, setting, and participants: Three datasets with TRUS images were collected at different institutions, using an iU22 (Philips Healthcare, Bothell, WA, USA), a Pro Focus 2202a (BK Medical), and an Aixplorer (SuperSonic Imagine, Aix-en-Provence, France) ultrasound scanner. The datasets contained 436 images from 181 men. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Manual delineations from an expert panel were used as ground truth. The (zonal) segmentation performance was evaluated in terms of the pixel-wise accuracy, Jaccard index, and Hausdorff distance. Results and limitations: The developed deep-learning approach was demonstrated to significantly improve prostate segmentation compared with a conventional automated technique, reaching median accuracy of 98% (95% confidence interval 95-99%), a Jaccard index of 0.93 (0.80-0.96), anda Hausdorff distance of 3.0 (1.3-8.7) mm. Zonal segmentation yielded pixel-wise accuracy of 97% (95-99%) and 98% (96-99%) for the peripheral and transition zones, respectively. Supervised domain adaptation resulted in retainment of high performance when applied to images from different ultrasound scanners (p > 0.05). Moreover, the algorithm's assessment of its own segmentation performance showed a strong correlation with the actual segmentation performance (Pearson's correlation 0.72, p < 0.001), indicating that possible incorrect segmentations can be identified swiftly. Conclusions: Fusion-guided prostate biopsies, targeting suspicious lesions on MRI using TRUS are increasingly performed. The requirement for (semi)manual prostate delineation places a substantial burden on clinicians. Deep learning provides a means for fast and accurate (zonal) prostate segmentation of TRUS images that translates to different scanners.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 85
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Manually controlled targeted prostate biopsy with real-time fusion imaging of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound: An early experience
    Shoji, Sunao
    Hiraiwa, Shinichiro
    Endo, Jun
    Hashida, Kazunobu
    Tomonaga, Tetsuro
    Nakano, Mayura
    Sugiyama, Tomoko
    Tajiri, Takuma
    Terachi, Toshiro
    Uchida, Toyoaki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 22 (02) : 173 - 178
  • [22] Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Ready for "Prime Time"?
    Loeb, Stacy
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (01) : 20 - 21
  • [23] Editorial Comment: Environmental Impact of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Thiel, Cassandra L.
    Gordon, Ilyssa
    Nolte, Adam C.
    Perecman, Aaron
    Loeb, Stacy
    Overcash, Michael
    Sherman, Jodi
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2023, 49 (03): : 383 - 385
  • [24] Deep Attentive Features for Prostate Segmentation in 3D Transrectal Ultrasound
    Wang, Yi
    Dou, Haoran
    Hu, Xiaowei
    Zhu, Lei
    Yang, Xin
    Xu, Ming
    Qin, Jing
    Heng, Pheng-Ann
    Wang, Tianfu
    Ni, Dong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 38 (12) : 2768 - 2778
  • [25] Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for detection of rectal wall invasion by prostate cancer
    Leibovici, D
    Kamat, AM
    Do, KA
    Pettaway, CA
    Ng, CS
    Evans, RB
    Rodriguez-Bigas, M
    Skibber, J
    Wang, XM
    Pisters, LL
    PROSTATE, 2005, 62 (01): : 101 - 104
  • [26] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
    Wang, Hsin-Kai
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASOUND, 2021, 29 (02) : 75 - 76
  • [27] Is transrectal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging better at estimating prostatic volume for patients with prostate cancer?
    Sandberg, Maxwell
    Whitman, Wyatt
    Rong, Anita
    Davis, Ronald
    Hemal, Ashok
    Tsivian, Matvey
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41
  • [28] How Often Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detect Prostate Cancer Missed by Transrectal Ultrasound?
    Herlemann, Annika
    Overland, Maya R.
    Washington, Samuel L.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Nguyen, Hao G.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (06): : 1268 - 1273
  • [29] Visibility of prostate cancer on transrectal ultrasound during fusion with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for biopsy
    van de Ven, Wendy J. M.
    Sedelaar, J. P. Michiel
    van der Leest, Marloes M. G.
    Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, Christina A.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Huisman, Henkjan J.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2016, 40 (04) : 745 - 750
  • [30] Transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of early cervical cancer
    Fischerova, D.
    Cibula, D.
    Stenhova, H.
    Vondrichova, H.
    Calda, P.
    Zikan, M.
    Freitag, P.
    Slama, J.
    Dundr, P.
    Belacek, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2008, 18 (04) : 766 - 772