A national dosimetric audit of IMRT

被引:53
|
作者
Budgell, Geoff [1 ]
Berresford, Joe [1 ]
Trainer, Michael [1 ]
Bradshaw, Ellie [1 ]
Sharpe, Peter [2 ]
Williams, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Christie NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
[2] Natl Phys Lab, Middlesex, England
关键词
IMRT; Audit; Dosimetry; Alanine; Film; Verification; UK RADIOTHERAPY CENTERS; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; NECK-CANCER; PHANTOM; BEAMS; HEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2011.03.016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: A dosimetric audit of IMRT has been carried out within the UK between June 2009 and March 2010 in order to provide an independent check of safe implementation and to identify problems in the modelling and delivery of IMRT. Methods and materials: A mail based audit involving film and alanine dosimeters was utilized. Measurements were made for each individual field in an IMRT plan isocentrically in a flat water-equivalent phantom at a depth of 5 cm. The films and alanine dosimeters were processed and analysed centrally; additional ion chamber measurements were made by each participating centre. Results: 57 of 62 centres participated, with a total of 78 plans submitted. For the film measurements, all 176 fields from the less complex IMRT plans (including prostate and breast plans) achieved over 95% pixels passing a gamma criterion of 3%/3 mm within the 20% isodose. For the more complex IMRT plans (mainly head and neck) 8/245 fields (3.3%) achieved less than 95% pixels passing a 4%/4 mm gamma criterion. Of the alanine measurements, 4/78 (5.1%) of the measurements differed by >5% from the dose predicted by the treatment planning system. Three of these were large deviations of -77.1%, -29.1% and 14.1% respectively. Excluding the three measurements outside 10%, the mean difference was 0.05% with a standard deviation of 1.5%. The out of tolerance results have been subjected to further investigations. Conclusions: A dosimetric audit has been successfully carried out of IMRT implementation by over 90% of UK radiotherapy departments. The audit shows that modelling and delivery of IMRT is accurate, suggesting that the implementation of IMRT has been carried out safely. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 99 (2011) 246-252
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 252
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dosimetric investigation of high dose rate, gated IMRT
    Lin, Teh
    Chen, Yan
    Hossain, Murshed
    Li, Jinsheng
    Ma, C. -M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (11) : 5079 - 5087
  • [42] Evaluation of the complexity of treatment plans from a national IMRT/VMAT audit - Towards a plan complexity score
    Santos, Tania
    Ventura, Tiago
    Lopes, Maria do Carmo
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 70 : 75 - 84
  • [43] Dosimetric characteristics of a new radiochromic film for IMRT dosimetry
    Soares, C
    Lombardi, M
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (06) : 1725 - 1725
  • [44] MLC dosimetric characteristics for small field and IMRT applications
    Bayouth, JE
    Morrill, SM
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (09) : 2545 - 2552
  • [45] IMRT versus VMAT for breast: a dosimetric point of view
    Moorthy, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S771 - S771
  • [46] Dosimetric IMRT verification with a flat-panel EPID
    Warkentin, B
    Steciw, S
    Rathee, S
    Fallone, BG
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (12) : 3143 - 3155
  • [47] Dosimetric consequences of IMRT on moving targets and critical structures
    Goddu, S
    Nelson, S
    Sharma, A
    Turrisi, A
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) : 1418 - 1418
  • [48] Exploiting dosimetric margins to reduce IMRT treated volumes
    Gordon, J. J.
    Siebers, J. V.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2523 - 2523
  • [49] Single Field IMRT QA Is Insensitive to Dosimetric Errors
    Kruse, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [50] Dosimetric Impact of Segmentation Differences in the Context of Brain IMRT
    Deeley, M. A.
    Cai, Y. C.
    Archambault, J.
    Hard, D.
    Heitkamp, H.
    Milnes, P.
    Reid, M.
    Wallace, H. J.
    Dawant, B. M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 168 - 168