Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam as preanesthetic medication in children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:64
|
作者
Pasin, Laura [1 ]
Febres, Daniela [1 ]
Testa, Valentina [1 ]
Frati, Elena [1 ]
Borghi, Giovanni [1 ]
Landoni, Giovanni [1 ,2 ]
Zangrillo, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS San Raffaele Sci Inst, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
关键词
anesthesia-pediatric; dexmedetomidine; meta-analysis; midazolam; premedication; children; INTRANASAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE; ORAL MIDAZOLAM; PREMEDICATION; PREVENTION; ANESTHESIA; INDUCTION; CLONIDINE; SUPERIOR; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1111/pan.12587
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe preoperative period is a stressing occurrence for most people undergoing surgery, in particular children. Approximately 50-75% of children undergoing surgery develop anxiety which is associated with distress on emergence from anesthesia and with later postoperative behavioral problems. Premedication, commonly performed with benzodiazepines, reduces preoperative anxiety, facilitates separation from parents, and promotes acceptance of mask induction. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective (2)-agonist with sedative and analgesic properties. A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on dexmedetomidine versus midazolam was performed to evaluate its efficacy in improving perioperative sedation and analgesia, and in reducing postoperative agitation when used as a preanesthetic medication in children. MethodsStudies were independently searched in PubMed, BioMedCentral, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials and updated on August 15th, 2014. Primary outcomes were represented by improved sedation at separation from parents, at induction of anesthesia, and reduction in postoperative agitation. Secondary outcomes were reduction in rescue analgesic drugs, and duration of surgery and anesthesia. Inclusion criteria were random allocation to treatment and comparison between dexmedetomidine and midazolam. Exclusion criteria were adult studies, duplicate publications, intravenous administration, and no data on main outcomes. ResultsData from 1033 children in 13 randomized trials were analyzed. Overall, in the dexmedetomidine group there was a higher incidence of satisfactory sedation at separation from parents (314 of 424 [74%] in the dexmedetomidine group vs 196 of 391 [50%] in the midazolam group, RR=1.30 [1.05-1.62], P=0.02), a reduced incidence of postoperative agitation (14 of 140 [10%] vs 56 of 141 [40%], RR=0.31 [0.13-0.73], P=0.008), and a significant reduction in the rescue doses of analgesic drugs (49 of 241 [20%] vs 95 of 243 [39%], RR=0.52 [0.39-0.70], P<0.001). There was no evidence of a higher incidence of satisfactory sedation at anesthesia induction or any reduction of duration of surgery and anesthesia. ConclusionsDexmedetomidine is effective in decreasing anxiety upon separation from parents, decreasing postoperative agitation, and providing more effective postoperative analgesia when compared with midazolam.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 476
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam or Propofol for Sedation During Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Two Randomized Controlled Trials
    Jakob, Stephan M.
    Ruokonen, Esko
    Grounds, R. Michael
    Sarapohja, Toni
    Garratt, Chris
    Pocock, Stuart J.
    Bratty, J. Raymond
    Takala, Jukka
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (11): : 1151 - 1160
  • [42] Effect of dexmedetomidine on preventing perioperative respiratory adverse events in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Junli
    Yin, Jing
    Li, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Yu
    Bai, Yaowu
    Yang, Hongyuan
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2023, 25 (06)
  • [43] Orthokeratology in controlling myopia of children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Li, Xue
    Xu, Meiling
    San, Shanshan
    Bian, Lanzheng
    Li, Hui
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [44] Orthokeratology in controlling myopia of children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xue Li
    Meiling Xu
    Shanshan San
    Lanzheng Bian
    Hui Li
    BMC Ophthalmology, 23
  • [45] A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Ausania, Fabio
    Landi, Filippo
    Martinez-Perez, Aleix
    Fondevila, Constantino
    HPB, 2019, 21 (12) : 1613 - 1620
  • [46] Antipsychotic Combinations vs Monotherapy in Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Correll, Christoph U.
    Rummel-Kluge, Christine
    Corves, Caroline
    Kane, John M.
    Leucht, Stefan
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2009, 35 (02) : 443 - 457
  • [47] Use of dexmedetomidine in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials
    Zhang, Ting
    Mei, Qimin
    Dai, Shabai
    Liu, Yecheng
    Zhu, Huadong
    ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [48] Caudal dexmedetomidine in pediatric caudal anesthesia A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Xian-xue
    Dai, Jing
    Dai, Li
    Guo, Hua-jing
    Zhou, Ai-guo
    Pan, Dao-bo
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (31)
  • [49] Efficacy and safety of sedation with dexmedetomidine in critical care patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Constantin, Jean-Michel
    Momon, Aurelien
    Mantz, Jean
    Payen, Jean-Francois
    De Jonghe, Bernard
    Perbet, Sebastien
    Cayot, Sophie
    Chanques, Gerald
    Perreira, Bruno
    ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (01) : 7 - 15
  • [50] The effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative and intensive care unit delirium: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Jiang, Fang
    Ye, Xiaodong
    Cai, Yin
    Xie, Xiang
    Wang, Lin
    Hua, Lin-lin
    Xia, Zhengyuan
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2020, 34