Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam as preanesthetic medication in children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:64
|
作者
Pasin, Laura [1 ]
Febres, Daniela [1 ]
Testa, Valentina [1 ]
Frati, Elena [1 ]
Borghi, Giovanni [1 ]
Landoni, Giovanni [1 ,2 ]
Zangrillo, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS San Raffaele Sci Inst, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
关键词
anesthesia-pediatric; dexmedetomidine; meta-analysis; midazolam; premedication; children; INTRANASAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE; ORAL MIDAZOLAM; PREMEDICATION; PREVENTION; ANESTHESIA; INDUCTION; CLONIDINE; SUPERIOR; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1111/pan.12587
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe preoperative period is a stressing occurrence for most people undergoing surgery, in particular children. Approximately 50-75% of children undergoing surgery develop anxiety which is associated with distress on emergence from anesthesia and with later postoperative behavioral problems. Premedication, commonly performed with benzodiazepines, reduces preoperative anxiety, facilitates separation from parents, and promotes acceptance of mask induction. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective (2)-agonist with sedative and analgesic properties. A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on dexmedetomidine versus midazolam was performed to evaluate its efficacy in improving perioperative sedation and analgesia, and in reducing postoperative agitation when used as a preanesthetic medication in children. MethodsStudies were independently searched in PubMed, BioMedCentral, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials and updated on August 15th, 2014. Primary outcomes were represented by improved sedation at separation from parents, at induction of anesthesia, and reduction in postoperative agitation. Secondary outcomes were reduction in rescue analgesic drugs, and duration of surgery and anesthesia. Inclusion criteria were random allocation to treatment and comparison between dexmedetomidine and midazolam. Exclusion criteria were adult studies, duplicate publications, intravenous administration, and no data on main outcomes. ResultsData from 1033 children in 13 randomized trials were analyzed. Overall, in the dexmedetomidine group there was a higher incidence of satisfactory sedation at separation from parents (314 of 424 [74%] in the dexmedetomidine group vs 196 of 391 [50%] in the midazolam group, RR=1.30 [1.05-1.62], P=0.02), a reduced incidence of postoperative agitation (14 of 140 [10%] vs 56 of 141 [40%], RR=0.31 [0.13-0.73], P=0.008), and a significant reduction in the rescue doses of analgesic drugs (49 of 241 [20%] vs 95 of 243 [39%], RR=0.52 [0.39-0.70], P<0.001). There was no evidence of a higher incidence of satisfactory sedation at anesthesia induction or any reduction of duration of surgery and anesthesia. ConclusionsDexmedetomidine is effective in decreasing anxiety upon separation from parents, decreasing postoperative agitation, and providing more effective postoperative analgesia when compared with midazolam.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 476
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy of dexmedetomidine on postoperative nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Liang, Xiao
    Zhou, Miao
    Feng, Jiao-Jiao
    Wu, Liang
    Fang, Shang-Ping
    Ge, Xin-Yu
    Sun, Hai-Jing
    Ren, Peng-Cheng
    Lv, Xin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (06): : 8450 - 8471
  • [22] A comprehensive evaluation between dexmedetomidine and midazolam for intraoperative sedation in the elderly: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chunxia Huang
    Zunjiang Li
    Yingxin Long
    Dongli Li
    Manhua Huang
    Banghan Ding
    Wei Zhu
    Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [23] A comprehensive evaluation between dexmedetomidine and midazolam for intraoperative sedation in the elderly: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Huang, Chunxia
    Li, Zunjiang
    Long, Yingxin
    Li, Dongli
    Huang, Manhua
    Ding, Banghan
    Zhu, Wei
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [24] Intranasal dexmedetomidine vs. oral midazolam for premedication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Guangxuan
    Xin, Li
    Yin, Qingtang
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 11
  • [25] Promethazine and Oral Midazolam Preanesthetic Children Medication
    Nadri, Sedigheh
    Mahmoudvand, Hormoz
    Taee, Nadereh
    Anbari, Khatereh
    Beiranvand, Siavash
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2020, 36 (07) : E369 - E372
  • [26] Enteral vs intravenous rehydration therapy for children with gastroenteritis - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Fonseca, BK
    Holdgate, A
    Craig, JC
    ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 2004, 158 (05): : 483 - 490
  • [27] Propofol vs midazolam sedation for elective endoscopy in patients with cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Guacho, John Alexander Lata
    de Moura, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux
    Ribeiro, Igor Braga
    da Ponte Neto, Alberto Machado
    Singh, Shailendra
    Tucci, Marina Gammaro Baldavira
    Bernardo, Wanderley Marques
    de Moura, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 12 (08):
  • [28] Effects of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Emergence Agitation in Children under Sevoflurane Anesthesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhang, Chengliang
    Hu, Jiajia
    Liu, Xinyao
    Yan, Jianqin
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (06):
  • [29] Dexmedetomidine Versus Morphine or Fentanyl in the Management of Children After Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    He, Xing-Ying
    Cao, Jian-Ping
    Shi, Xue-Yin
    Zhang, Hao
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2013, 122 (02): : 114 - 120
  • [30] Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam/propofol sedation reduces delirium in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Xing, Shunpeng
    Ding, Jia
    Wang, Jiemin
    Jiang, Tao
    He, Zhengyu
    Gao, Yuan
    Li, Wen
    Wen, Daxiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (08): : 7727 - 7739