Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam as preanesthetic medication in children: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:64
|
作者
Pasin, Laura [1 ]
Febres, Daniela [1 ]
Testa, Valentina [1 ]
Frati, Elena [1 ]
Borghi, Giovanni [1 ]
Landoni, Giovanni [1 ,2 ]
Zangrillo, Alberto [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS San Raffaele Sci Inst, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
关键词
anesthesia-pediatric; dexmedetomidine; meta-analysis; midazolam; premedication; children; INTRANASAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE; ORAL MIDAZOLAM; PREMEDICATION; PREVENTION; ANESTHESIA; INDUCTION; CLONIDINE; SUPERIOR; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1111/pan.12587
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe preoperative period is a stressing occurrence for most people undergoing surgery, in particular children. Approximately 50-75% of children undergoing surgery develop anxiety which is associated with distress on emergence from anesthesia and with later postoperative behavioral problems. Premedication, commonly performed with benzodiazepines, reduces preoperative anxiety, facilitates separation from parents, and promotes acceptance of mask induction. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective (2)-agonist with sedative and analgesic properties. A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on dexmedetomidine versus midazolam was performed to evaluate its efficacy in improving perioperative sedation and analgesia, and in reducing postoperative agitation when used as a preanesthetic medication in children. MethodsStudies were independently searched in PubMed, BioMedCentral, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of clinical trials and updated on August 15th, 2014. Primary outcomes were represented by improved sedation at separation from parents, at induction of anesthesia, and reduction in postoperative agitation. Secondary outcomes were reduction in rescue analgesic drugs, and duration of surgery and anesthesia. Inclusion criteria were random allocation to treatment and comparison between dexmedetomidine and midazolam. Exclusion criteria were adult studies, duplicate publications, intravenous administration, and no data on main outcomes. ResultsData from 1033 children in 13 randomized trials were analyzed. Overall, in the dexmedetomidine group there was a higher incidence of satisfactory sedation at separation from parents (314 of 424 [74%] in the dexmedetomidine group vs 196 of 391 [50%] in the midazolam group, RR=1.30 [1.05-1.62], P=0.02), a reduced incidence of postoperative agitation (14 of 140 [10%] vs 56 of 141 [40%], RR=0.31 [0.13-0.73], P=0.008), and a significant reduction in the rescue doses of analgesic drugs (49 of 241 [20%] vs 95 of 243 [39%], RR=0.52 [0.39-0.70], P<0.001). There was no evidence of a higher incidence of satisfactory sedation at anesthesia induction or any reduction of duration of surgery and anesthesia. ConclusionsDexmedetomidine is effective in decreasing anxiety upon separation from parents, decreasing postoperative agitation, and providing more effective postoperative analgesia when compared with midazolam.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 476
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is dexmedetomidine superior to midazolam as a premedication in children? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sun, Yu
    Lu, Yi
    Huang, Yan
    Jiang, Hong
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2014, 24 (08) : 863 - 874
  • [2] Comparison of dexmedetomidine with midazolam for third molar surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Ling
    Yang, Hongmei
    Le, Xi
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (25) : E33155
  • [3] Comparing Intravenous Dexmedetomidine With Midazolam in Patients Undergoing Bronchoscopy: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Liang, Yujie
    Xu, Wenxing
    He, Weijie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS, 2025, 32 (01) : e98 - e100
  • [4] Preanesthetic medication in children: A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam
    Ghali, Ashraf M.
    Mahfouz, Abdul Kader
    Al-Bahrani, Maher
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 5 (04) : 387 - 391
  • [5] A comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in pediatric sedation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis
    Lang, Bingchen
    Zhang, Lingli
    Zhang, Wensheng
    Lin, Yunzhu
    Fu, Yuzhi
    Chen, Shouming
    CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 26 (08) : 862 - 875
  • [6] Dexmedetomidine vs. propofol on arrhythmia in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Peng, Juan
    Wu, Yifan
    Li, Lin
    Xia, Panpan
    Yu, Peng
    Zhang, Jing
    Liu, Xiao
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [7] Evaluation of the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as a Local Anesthetic Adjuvant in Children: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sun, Yan
    Wu, Zhilin
    Sun, ShuJun
    Chen, Rui
    Dai, Maosha
    Dou, Xiaoke
    Lin, Yun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 62 (08): : 935 - 947
  • [8] Dexmedetomidine for antiemesis in gynecologic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhong, Wei-Guo
    Ge, Xin-Yu
    Zhu, Hai
    Liang, Xiao
    Gong, Hong-Xia
    Zhong, Ming
    Xiao, Xiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (09): : 14566 - 14576
  • [9] The efficacy of dexmedetomidine for septic shock: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Huang, Xue
    He, Chunyan
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (35) : E34414
  • [10] Differences in efficacy and safety of midazolam vs. dexmedetomidine in critically ill patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial
    Zhou, Wen-Jun
    Liu, Mei
    Fan, Xue-Peng
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2021, 21 (02)