Comprehensive Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Hydrological Drought Forecasting

被引:29
|
作者
Jehanzaib, Muhammad [1 ]
Idrees, Muhammad Bilal [2 ]
Kim, Dongkyun [3 ]
Kim, Tae-Woong [4 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Res Inst Engn & Technol, Ansan 15588, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Seoul 04763, South Korea
[3] Hongik Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Seoul 04066, South Korea
[4] Hanyang Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ansan 15588, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Drought forecasting; Machine learning (ML); Standardized runoff index (SRI); Decision tree (DT); METEOROLOGICAL DROUGHT; RIVER-BASIN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001575
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Drought is among the most hazardous climatic disasters that significantly influence various aspects of the environment and human life. Qualitative and reliable drought forecasting is important worldwide for effective planning and decision-making in disaster-prone regions. Data-driven models have been extensively used for drought forecasting, but due to the inadequacy of information on model performance, the selection of an appropriate forecasting model remains a challenge. This study concerns a comparative analysis of six machine learning (ML) techniques widely used for hydrological drought forecasting. The standardized runoff index (SRI) was calculated at a seasonal (3-month) time scale for the period 1973 to 2016 in four selected watersheds of the Han River basin in South Korea. The ML models employed were built-ins, using precipitation, temperature, and humidity as input variables and the SRI as the target variable. The results indicated that all the ML models were able to map the relationship for seasonal SRI using the applied input vectors. The decision tree (DT) technique outperformed in all the watersheds with an average mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.26, root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.34, Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) = 0.87, and coefficient of determination (R-2) = 0.89. The performances of the support vector machine (SVM) and deep learning neural network (DLNN) were similar, whereas the fuzzy rule-based system (FRBS) performed very well compared to the artificial neural network (ANN) and the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). The overall findings of this study indicate that, considering performance criteria and computation time, the DT was the most accurate ML technique for hydrological drought forecasting in the Han River basin. (C) 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Forecasting Bitcoin volatility using machine learning techniques
    Huang, Zih-Chun
    Sangiorgi, Ivan
    Urquhart, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2024, 97
  • [42] Stock Price Forecasting by Hybrid Machine Learning Techniques
    Tsai, C-F
    Wang, S-P
    IMECS 2009: INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CONFERENCE OF ENGINEERS AND COMPUTER SCIENTISTS, VOLS I AND II, 2009, : 755 - +
  • [43] Comprehensive evaluation of the response relationship between meteorological drought and hydrological drought in the Yalong River Basin, China
    Wen, Yunliang
    Kang, Ling
    Zhou, Liwei
    Liao, Wufeng
    Guo, Xuye
    GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [44] OPTIMAL FILTERING TECHNIQUES FOR HYDROLOGICAL FORECASTING
    MAISSIS, AH
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1977, 33 (3-4) : 319 - 330
  • [45] Survey of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Travel Demand Forecasting
    Sison, Nicolai
    Li, Lin
    Han, Meng
    2021 IEEE SMARTWORLD, UBIQUITOUS INTELLIGENCE & COMPUTING, ADVANCED & TRUSTED COMPUTING, SCALABLE COMPUTING & COMMUNICATIONS, INTERNET OF PEOPLE, AND SMART CITY INNOVATIONS (SMARTWORLD/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/IOP/SCI 2021), 2021, : 606 - 613
  • [46] Solar Energy Forecasting Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques
    T. Rajasundrapandiyanleebanon
    K. Kumaresan
    Sakthivel Murugan
    M. S. P. Subathra
    Mahima Sivakumar
    Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2023, 30 (5) : 3059 - 3079
  • [47] Solar Energy Forecasting Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques
    Rajasundrapandiyanleebanon, T.
    Kumaresan, K.
    Murugan, Sakthivel
    Subathra, M. S. P.
    Sivakumar, Mahima
    ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2023, 30 (05) : 3059 - 3079
  • [48] Predicting Standardized Streamflow index for hydrological drought using machine learning models
    Shamshirband, Shahabbodin
    Hashemi, Sajjad
    Salimi, Hana
    Samadianfard, Saeed
    Asadi, Esmaeil
    Shadkani, Sadra
    Kargar, Katayoun
    Mosavi, Amir
    Nabipour, Narjes
    Chau, Kwok-Wing
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2020, 14 (01) : 339 - 350
  • [49] Machine learning for comprehensive forecasting of Alzheimer’s Disease progression
    Charles K. Fisher
    Aaron M. Smith
    Jonathan R. Walsh
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [50] Machine learning for comprehensive forecasting of Alzheimer's Disease progression
    Fisher, Charles K.
    Smith, Aaron M.
    Walsh, Jonathan R.
    Simone, Adam J.
    Edgar, Chris
    Jack, Clifford R.
    Holtzman, David
    Russell, David
    Hill, Derek
    Grosset, Donald
    Wood, Fred
    Vanderstichele, Hugo
    Morris, John
    Blennown, Kaj
    Marek, Ken
    Shaw, Leslie M.
    Albert, Marilyn
    Weiner, Michael
    Fox, Nick
    Aisen, Paul
    Cole, Patricia E.
    Petersen, Ronald
    Sherer, Todd
    Kubick, Wayne
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)