Comprehensive Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Hydrological Drought Forecasting

被引:29
|
作者
Jehanzaib, Muhammad [1 ]
Idrees, Muhammad Bilal [2 ]
Kim, Dongkyun [3 ]
Kim, Tae-Woong [4 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Res Inst Engn & Technol, Ansan 15588, South Korea
[2] Hanyang Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Seoul 04763, South Korea
[3] Hongik Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Seoul 04066, South Korea
[4] Hanyang Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ansan 15588, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Drought forecasting; Machine learning (ML); Standardized runoff index (SRI); Decision tree (DT); METEOROLOGICAL DROUGHT; RIVER-BASIN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001575
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Drought is among the most hazardous climatic disasters that significantly influence various aspects of the environment and human life. Qualitative and reliable drought forecasting is important worldwide for effective planning and decision-making in disaster-prone regions. Data-driven models have been extensively used for drought forecasting, but due to the inadequacy of information on model performance, the selection of an appropriate forecasting model remains a challenge. This study concerns a comparative analysis of six machine learning (ML) techniques widely used for hydrological drought forecasting. The standardized runoff index (SRI) was calculated at a seasonal (3-month) time scale for the period 1973 to 2016 in four selected watersheds of the Han River basin in South Korea. The ML models employed were built-ins, using precipitation, temperature, and humidity as input variables and the SRI as the target variable. The results indicated that all the ML models were able to map the relationship for seasonal SRI using the applied input vectors. The decision tree (DT) technique outperformed in all the watersheds with an average mean absolute error (MAE) = 0.26, root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.34, Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) = 0.87, and coefficient of determination (R-2) = 0.89. The performances of the support vector machine (SVM) and deep learning neural network (DLNN) were similar, whereas the fuzzy rule-based system (FRBS) performed very well compared to the artificial neural network (ANN) and the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). The overall findings of this study indicate that, considering performance criteria and computation time, the DT was the most accurate ML technique for hydrological drought forecasting in the Han River basin. (C) 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Discussion of "Comprehensive Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Hydrological Drought Forecasting" by Muhammad Jehanzaib, Muhammad Bilal Idrees, Dongkyun Kim, and Tae-Woong Kim
    Ebtehaj, Ise
    Bonakdari, Hossein
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2022, 148 (12)
  • [2] A review of deep learning and machine learning techniques for hydrological inflow forecasting
    Latif, Sarmad Dashti
    Ahmed, Ali Najah
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 25 (11) : 12189 - 12216
  • [3] A review of deep learning and machine learning techniques for hydrological inflow forecasting
    Sarmad Dashti Latif
    Ali Najah Ahmed
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2023, 25 : 12189 - 12216
  • [4] Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Hydrological Drought Modeling: A Case Study of the Wadi Ouahrane Basin in Algeria
    Achite, Mohammed
    Jehanzaib, Muhammad
    Elshaboury, Nehal
    Kim, Tae-Woong
    WATER, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [5] Machine Learning Techniques for Renewable Energy Forecasting: A Comprehensive Review
    Gaamouche, Rajae
    Chinnici, Marta
    Lahby, Mohamed
    Abakarim, Youness
    Hasnaoui, Abdennebi El
    Green Energy and Technology, 2022, : 3 - 39
  • [6] Drought modelling and forecasting using shallow and deep machine learning techniques
    Alkubaisi, Hiba
    Mehr, Ali Danandeh
    Adarsh, S.
    Khan, Md Munir Hayet
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 11 (01)
  • [7] Monthly and seasonal hydrological drought forecasting using multiple extreme learning machine models
    Wang, Guo Chun
    Zhang, Qian
    Band, Shahab S.
    Dehghani, Majid
    Chau, Kwok Wing
    Tho, Quan Thanh
    Zhu, Senlin
    Samadianfard, Saeed
    Mosavi, Amir
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2022, 16 (01) : 1364 - 1381
  • [8] Hydrological Drought Forecasting Using Machine Learning-Gidra River Case Study
    Almikaeel, Wael
    Cubanova, Lea
    Soltesz, Andrej
    WATER, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [9] A Comprehensive Review on Machine Learning Techniques for Forecasting Wind Flow Pattern
    Sri Preethaa, K. R.
    Muthuramalingam, Akila
    Natarajan, Yuvaraj
    Wadhwa, Gitanjali
    Ali, Ahmed Abdi Yusuf
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (17)
  • [10] A Comprehensive Review of Various Machine Learning Techniques used in Load Forecasting
    Mohan, Divya Priyadharshini
    Subathra, M. S. P.
    RECENT ADVANCES IN ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2023, 16 (03) : 197 - 210