Improved pasture and herd management to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from a Brazilian beef production system

被引:58
|
作者
Mazzetto, A. M. [1 ]
Feigl, B. J. [1 ]
Schils, R. L. M. [2 ]
Cerri, C. E. P. [3 ]
Cerri, C. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Ctr Energia Nucl Agr, BR-13400970 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res Ctr, Alterra, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Escola Super Agr Luiz de Queiroz, BR-13400000 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Beef herd; Sustainable intensification; Brazil; Nitrous oxide; Methane; Carbon dioxide; WHOLE-FARM SYSTEMS; NITROGEN-FERTILIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION; CATTLE PRODUCTION; SOIL CARBON; MATO-GROSSO; X NELLORE; AMAZON; AGRICULTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.livsci.2015.02.014
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Brazilian farms produce 15% of the world's beef, and consequently they are important sources of greenhouse gases (GHG). The beef sector faces the challenge to meet the increasing demand without further increase of GHG emissions. To reduce the pressure on forests it is essential that farmers are provided with sustainable options of intensification of pasture growth and cattle production. The improvement of the whole-farm beef production system is essential to reduce emissions from all relevant sources, like land use, land use change and livestock. The main objective was to quantify the GHG gas emissions of different beef production systems in Brazil. Therefore we developed a whole farm model that allowed us to calculate GHG emissions from all-important sources (only "on-farm" i.e., not considering emissions from the production of fertilizer, lime or other inputs) for a beef production system in Brazil. We studied the effects of intensification in several steps, starting with a baseline extensive system, followed by four steps of intensification. The main differences between the scenarios are related to pasture management, i.e. continuous or rotational grazing, pasture condition, stocking rate, use of lime and fertilizer, and irrigation; and animal performance, i.e. calving interval, age at first calving, conception rate, total life time until slaughter, and genetic improvement. Compared to the baseline extensive scenario, the total pasture area decreased up to 92% in the most intensified system, while beef production nearly doubled. Intensification increased the number of calves, steers and heifers decreased the total production cycle time and the slaughter age of the steers. Overall, the emission of kg CO(2)eq kg carcass(-1) was lower with increasing intensification, with an average of 41 kg CO(2)eq kg carcass(-1). The emissions of CH4 decreased, while the emissions of N2O and CO2 increased due to nitrogen fertilizer and lime application. The intensification of beef production, through improved pasture and herd management, reduced the GHG emissions per kg of beef from 2% to 57%. The complete cycle of beef production in intensified systems required less time (years) and area (ha), and may thus help to alleviate the pressure on forests. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 112
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Climate change mitigation through intensified pasture management: Estimating greenhouse gas emissions on cattle farms in the Brazilian Amazon
    Bogaerts, Meghan
    Cirhigiri, Lora
    Robinson, Ian
    Rodkin, Mikaela
    Hajjar, Reem
    Costa Junior, Ciniro
    Newton, Peter
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 162 : 1539 - 1550
  • [22] Influence of climate variability and stocking strategies on greenhouse gas emissions (GHGE), production and profit of a northern Queensland beef cattle herd
    Cullen, Brendan R.
    Macleod, Neil D.
    Scanlan, Joe C.
    Doran-Browne, Natalie
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2018, 58 (06) : 990 - 997
  • [23] Does certified organic farming reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural production?
    Julius Alexander McGee
    Agriculture and Human Values, 2015, 32 : 255 - 263
  • [24] Does certified organic farming reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural production?
    McGee, Julius Alexander
    AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2015, 32 (02) : 255 - 263
  • [25] Greenhouse gas emissions from different plant production system in China
    Meng, Weiqing
    He, Mengxuan
    Li, Hongyuan
    Hu, Beibei
    Mo, Xunqiang
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 235 : 741 - 750
  • [26] Improved fertiliser management to reduce the greenhouse-gas emissions and ensure yields in a wheat–peanut relay intercropping system in China
    Zhaoxin Liu
    Chen Zhao
    Jihao Zhao
    Huajiang Lai
    Xiangdong Li
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 22531 - 22546
  • [27] Simulation and Prediction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Beef Cattle
    Chen, Xiao
    Tao, Tao
    Zhou, Jiaxin
    Yu, Helong
    Guo, Hongliang
    Chen, Hongbing
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (15)
  • [28] Herd parameters in organic and conventional dairy farms and their role in greenhouse gas emissions from milk production
    Blank, Britta
    Schaub, Dagmar
    Paulsen, Hans Marten
    Rahmann, Gerold
    TACKLING THE FUTURE CHALLENGES OF ORGANIC ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, 2012, 362 : 270 - 273
  • [29] Increasing beef production could lower greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil if decoupled from deforestation
    De Oliveira Silva R.
    Barioni L.G.
    Hall J.A.J.
    Folegatti Matsuura M.
    Zanett Albertini T.
    Fernandes F.A.
    Moran D.
    Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6 (5) : 493 - 497
  • [30] Increasing beef production could lower greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil if decoupled from deforestation
    Silva, R. de Oliveira
    Barioni, L. G.
    Hall, J. A. J.
    Matsuura, M. Folegatti
    Albertini, T. Zanett
    Fernandes, F. A.
    Moran, D.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2016, 6 (05) : 493 - +