Improved pasture and herd management to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from a Brazilian beef production system

被引:58
|
作者
Mazzetto, A. M. [1 ]
Feigl, B. J. [1 ]
Schils, R. L. M. [2 ]
Cerri, C. E. P. [3 ]
Cerri, C. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Ctr Energia Nucl Agr, BR-13400970 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res Ctr, Alterra, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Escola Super Agr Luiz de Queiroz, BR-13400000 Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Beef herd; Sustainable intensification; Brazil; Nitrous oxide; Methane; Carbon dioxide; WHOLE-FARM SYSTEMS; NITROGEN-FERTILIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION; CATTLE PRODUCTION; SOIL CARBON; MATO-GROSSO; X NELLORE; AMAZON; AGRICULTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.livsci.2015.02.014
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Brazilian farms produce 15% of the world's beef, and consequently they are important sources of greenhouse gases (GHG). The beef sector faces the challenge to meet the increasing demand without further increase of GHG emissions. To reduce the pressure on forests it is essential that farmers are provided with sustainable options of intensification of pasture growth and cattle production. The improvement of the whole-farm beef production system is essential to reduce emissions from all relevant sources, like land use, land use change and livestock. The main objective was to quantify the GHG gas emissions of different beef production systems in Brazil. Therefore we developed a whole farm model that allowed us to calculate GHG emissions from all-important sources (only "on-farm" i.e., not considering emissions from the production of fertilizer, lime or other inputs) for a beef production system in Brazil. We studied the effects of intensification in several steps, starting with a baseline extensive system, followed by four steps of intensification. The main differences between the scenarios are related to pasture management, i.e. continuous or rotational grazing, pasture condition, stocking rate, use of lime and fertilizer, and irrigation; and animal performance, i.e. calving interval, age at first calving, conception rate, total life time until slaughter, and genetic improvement. Compared to the baseline extensive scenario, the total pasture area decreased up to 92% in the most intensified system, while beef production nearly doubled. Intensification increased the number of calves, steers and heifers decreased the total production cycle time and the slaughter age of the steers. Overall, the emission of kg CO(2)eq kg carcass(-1) was lower with increasing intensification, with an average of 41 kg CO(2)eq kg carcass(-1). The emissions of CH4 decreased, while the emissions of N2O and CO2 increased due to nitrogen fertilizer and lime application. The intensification of beef production, through improved pasture and herd management, reduced the GHG emissions per kg of beef from 2% to 57%. The complete cycle of beef production in intensified systems required less time (years) and area (ha), and may thus help to alleviate the pressure on forests. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 112
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from a beef pasture system in southern Manitoba using measurements and a systems-based model
    Stewart, A. A.
    Wilson, C. H.
    Ominski, K. H.
    Tremorin, D.
    Tenuta, M.
    Wittenberg, K. M.
    Janzen, H. H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2009, 89 (01) : 135 - 136
  • [12] Greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian beef industry
    Verge, X. P. C.
    Dyer, J. A.
    Desjardins, R. L.
    Worth, D.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2008, 98 (02) : 126 - 134
  • [13] Assessing the greenhouse gas emissions of Brazilian soybean biodiesel production
    Pellegrino Cerri, Carlos Eduardo
    You, Xin
    Cherubin, Mauricio Roberto
    Moreira, Cindy Silva
    Raucci, Guilherme Silva
    Castigioni, Bruno de Almeida
    Alves, Priscila Aparecida
    Pellegrino Cerri, Domingos Guilherme
    de Castro Mello, Francisco Fujita
    Cerri, Carlos Clemente
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (05):
  • [14] Waste management options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from paper in Australia
    Pickin, JG
    Yuen, STS
    Hennings, H
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 36 (04) : 741 - 752
  • [15] Large Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Temperate Peatland Pasture
    Teh, Yit Arn
    Silver, Whendee L.
    Sonnentag, Oliver
    Detto, Matteo
    Kelly, Maggi
    Baldocchi, Dennis D.
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2011, 14 (02) : 311 - 325
  • [16] Mitigating Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Emissions from Beef Cattle Feedlot Production: A System Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Yue
    Li, Xinrong
    Yang, Jinfeng
    Tian, Zhuang
    Sun, Qinping
    Xue, Wentao
    Dong, Hongmin
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 52 (19) : 11232 - 11242
  • [17] Large Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Temperate Peatland Pasture
    Yit Arn Teh
    Whendee L. Silver
    Oliver Sonnentag
    Matteo Detto
    Maggi Kelly
    Dennis D. Baldocchi
    Ecosystems, 2011, 14 : 311 - 325
  • [19] Impact of grass silage quality on greenhouse gas emissions from dairy and beef production
    Aby, Bente A.
    Randby, Ashild T.
    Bonesmo, Helge
    Aass, Laila
    GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 2019, 74 (03) : 525 - 534
  • [20] Greenhouse gas emissions of Canadian beef production in 1981 as compared with 2011
    Legesse, G.
    Beauchemin, K. A.
    Ominski, K. H.
    McGeough, E. J.
    Kroebel, R.
    MacDonald, D.
    Little, S. M.
    McAllister, T. A.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (2-3) : 153 - 168