Diagnostic test accuracy of ultrasound for synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:61
|
作者
Takase-Minegishi, Kaoru [1 ]
Horita, Nobuyuki [2 ]
Kobayashi, Kouji [1 ]
Yoshimi, Ryusuke [3 ]
Kirino, Yohei [3 ]
Ohno, Shigeru [1 ]
Kaneko, Takeshi [2 ]
Nakajima, Hideaki [3 ]
Wakefield, Richard J. [4 ]
Emery, Paul [4 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama City Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Rheumat Dis, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[2] Yokohama City Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Pulmonol, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[3] Yokohama City Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Stem Cell & Immune Regulat, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
[4] Univ Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomed Res Unit, Leeds Inst Rheumat & Musculoskeletal Med, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
rheumatoid arthritis; ultrasound; magnetic resonance imaging; POWER DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHY; DYNAMIC MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; CLINICAL REMISSION; METACARPOPHALANGEAL JOINTS; KNEE SYNOVITIS; COHORTS; CONTRAST; CLASSIFICATION; INFLAMMATION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1093/rheumatology/kex036
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate diagnostic test accuracy of US compared with MRI for the detection of synovitis in RA patients. Methods. A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection databases. Studies evaluating the diagnostic test accuracy of US for synovitis detected by MRI as the reference standard for wrist, MCP, PIP and knee joints were included. To assess the overall accuracy, we calculated the diagnostic odds ratio using a DerSimonian-Laird random effects model and the area under the curve (AUC) for the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics using Holling's proportional hazards models. The summary estimate of the sensitivity and specificity were obtained using the bivariate model. Results. Fourteen of 601 identified articles were included in the review. The diagnostic odds ratio was 11.6 (95% CI 5.6, 24; I-2 = 0%), 28 (95% CI 12, 66; I-2 = 11%), 23 (95% CI 6.5, 84; I-2 = 19%) and 5.3 (95% CI 0.60, 48; I-2 = 0%) and the AUC was 0.81, 0.91, 0.91 and 0.61 for wrist, MCP, PIP and knee joints, respectively. The summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were 0.73 (95% CI 0.51, 0.87)/0.78 (95% CI 0.46, 0.94), 0.64 (95% CI 0.43, 0.81)/0.93 (95% CI 0.88, 0.97), 0.71 (95% CI 0.33, 0.93)/0.94 (95% CI 0.89, 0.97) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.56, 0.99)/0.60 (95% CI 0.20, 0.90) for wrist, MCP, PIP and knee joints, respectively. Conclusion. US is a valid and reproducible technique for detecting synovitis in the wrist and finger joints. It may be considered for routine use as part of the standard diagnostic tools in RA.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 58
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound for shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Takuo Yoshida
    Takuya Yoshida
    Hisashi Noma
    Takeshi Nomura
    Akihiro Suzuki
    Takahiro Mihara
    Critical Care, 27
  • [42] Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Santo, Rafaela C. E.
    Fernandes, Kevin Z.
    Lora, Priscila S.
    Filippin, Lidiane I.
    Xavier, Ricardo M.
    JOURNAL OF CACHEXIA SARCOPENIA AND MUSCLE, 2018, 9 (05) : 816 - 825
  • [43] Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Cardiac Imaging for AL Amyloidosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kawtharany, Hassan
    Azzam, Muayad
    Nazzal, Jamil
    Kukreti, Vishal
    Seftel, Matthew D.
    Hamarsha, Qais
    Alkhader, Aseel
    Khraise, Tala
    Almasri, Mohammad Mahmoud
    Zeid, Hadi Khaled Abou
    Alwan, Iktimal
    Alzabibi, Mhd Amin
    Jaber, Noor
    Darwish, Laura
    Jamal, Faizi
    Dasgupta, Noel
    Sarswat, Nitasha
    de la Torre, Alfredo H.
    Aguirre, Maria Adela
    Boedicker, Deborah
    Bumma, Naresh
    Carroll, Antonia
    Comenzo, Raymond
    Cook, Joselle
    Dispenzieri, Angela
    Khouri, Jack
    Picken, Maria M.
    Raza, Shahzad
    Leung, Nelson
    Sanchorawala, Vaishali
    Shaikh, Hira
    Singh, Daulath
    Mustafa, Reem A.
    BLOOD, 2024, 144 : 1919 - 1920
  • [44] Blood biomarkers for sarcopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
    Lian, Rongna
    Liu, Qianqian
    Jiang, Gengchen
    Zhang, Xiangyu
    Tang, Huiyu
    Lu, Jing
    Yang, Ming
    AGEING RESEARCH REVIEWS, 2024, 93
  • [45] Diagnostic Test Accuracy of the 4AT for Delirium Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jeong, Eunhye
    Park, Jinkyung
    Lee, Juneyoung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (20) : 1 - 15
  • [46] Diagnostic test accuracy of glutamate dehydrogenase for Clostridium difficile: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Arimoto, Jun
    Horita, Nobuyuki
    Kato, Shingo
    Fuyuki, Akiko
    Higurashi, Takuma
    Ohkubo, Hidenori
    Endo, Hiroki
    Takashi, Nonaka
    Kaneko, Takeshi
    Nakajima, Atsushi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [47] A systematic review with meta-analysis of the diagnostic test accuracy of pedicle screw electrical stimulation
    Fonseca, Pedro
    Goethel, Marcio
    Vilas-Boas, Joao Paulo
    Gutierres, Manuel
    Correia, Miguel Velhote
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 31 (07) : 1599 - 1610
  • [48] Successful Publication of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy
    Suh, Chong Hyun
    Park, Seong Ho
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 17 (01) : 5 - 6
  • [49] Diagnostic test accuracy of glutamate dehydrogenase for Clostridium difficile: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jun Arimoto
    Nobuyuki Horita
    Shingo Kato
    Akiko Fuyuki
    Takuma Higurashi
    Hidenori Ohkubo
    Hiroki Endo
    Nonaka Takashi
    Takeshi Kaneko
    Atsushi Nakajima
    Scientific Reports, 6
  • [50] DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY OF THE 4AT FOR DELIRIUM DETECTION: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Tieges, Z.
    MacLullich, A. M. J.
    Anand, A.
    Cassaroni, M.
    O'Connor, M.
    Ryan, D.
    Saller, T.
    Arora, R.
    Chang, Y.
    Agarwal, K.
    Taffet, G.
    Quinn, T.
    Shenkin, S.
    Galvin, R.
    AGE AND AGEING, 2021, 50