Induction of labour using prostaglandin E2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

被引:28
|
作者
Beckmann, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gibbons, K. [3 ]
Flenady, V [3 ]
Kumar, S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mater Hlth, Level 6 Duncombe Bldg,Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Mater Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Balloon; cervical ripening; labour; induced; mechanical methods; outpatient; prostaglandin; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.16030
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To compare clinical outcomes following induction of labour (IOL) using a balloon catheter and going home, versus prostaglandin (PG) as an inpatient. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Eight Australian maternity hospitals. Population Women with uncomplicated term singleton pregnancies undergoing IOL for low-risk indications including post-term, advanced maternal age and 'social' reasons. Methods Between September 2015 and October 2018, 347 women were randomised to a balloon outpatient group and 348 to a PG inpatient group. The PG group received Dinoprostone, either 2 mg gel or 10 mg controlled-release tape. The balloon group had a double-balloon catheter inserted and went home. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was a composite neonatal measure comprising nursery admission, intubation/cardiac compressions, acidaemia, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, seizure, infection, pulmonary hypertension, stillbirth or death. Clinical and process outcomes are reported. Results There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcome comparing balloon with PG (18.6% versus 25.8%; relative risk = 0.77, 95% CI 0.51-1.02; P = 0.070), cord arterial pH <7.10 (3.5% versus 9.2%; P = 0.072), nursery admissions (12.6% versus 15.5%; P = 0.379), neonatal antibiotic use (12.1% versus 17.6%; P = 0.103), or mode of birth. Nulliparous women in the balloon group had lower rates of the primary outcome (20.4% versus 31.0%;P = 0.032); Parous women were less likely to have an unassisted vaginal birth (77.6% versus 92.3%; P = 0.045). Conclusions Balloon catheters may be a superior method of cervical priming for nulliparous women, whereas this may not be the case for parous women. It is feasible that nulliparous women go home after commencing balloon catheter IOL, and the likelihood of adverse outcomes is low. Tweetable abstract Multicentre trial shows outpatient induction using balloon catheter is safe and feasible for nulliparous women.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 579
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
    ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G.
    Rengerink, Katrien Oude
    Jozwiak, Marta
    de Leeuw, Jan W.
    de Graaf, Irene M.
    van Pampus, Marille G.
    Holswilder, Marloes
    Oudijk, Martijn A.
    van Baaren, Gert-Jan
    Pernet, Paula J. M.
    Bax, Caroline
    van Unnik, Gijs A.
    Martens, Gratia
    Porath, Martina
    van Vliet, Huib
    Rijnders, Robbert J. P.
    Feitsma, A. Hanneke
    Roumen, Frans J. M. E.
    van Loon, Aren J.
    Versendaal, Hans
    Weinans, Martin J. N.
    Woiski, Mallory
    van Beek, Erik
    Hermsen, Brenda
    Mol, Ben Willem
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
    LANCET, 2016, 387 (10028): : 1619 - 1628
  • [42] Transcervical Foley balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert combination vs. vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert only for induction of labor at term: a randomized clinical trial
    Eser, Ahmet
    Ozkaya, Enis
    Abide, Cigdem Yayla
    Eser, Tugba
    Eser, Gulcin Yildirim
    Abike, Faruk
    Tayyar, Ahter Tanay
    Eroglu, Mustafa
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2019, 299 (02) : 451 - 457
  • [43] Randomised trial of one versus two doses of prostaglandin E-2 for induction of labour .2. Analysis of cost
    MacKenzie, IZ
    Magill, P
    Burns, E
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 104 (09): : 1068 - 1072
  • [44] Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term (The Digitat Trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Boers, Kim
    Vijgen, Sylvia
    Bijlenga, Denise
    Van Der Post, Joris
    Bekedam, Dick
    Kwee, Anneke
    Van Der Salm, Paulien
    Van Pampus, Marielle
    Spaanderman, Marc
    De Boer, Karin
    Duvekot, Hans
    Bremer, Henk
    Hasaart, Tom
    Delemarre, Friso
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty
    Van Meir, Claudia
    Willekes, Christine
    Wijnen, Ella
    Rijken, Monique
    Le Cessie, Saskia
    Roumen, Frans
    Van Lith, Jan
    Mol, Ben Willem
    Scherjon, Sicco
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (06) : S3 - S3
  • [45] Transcervical Foley balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert combination vs. vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert only for induction of labor at term: a randomized clinical trial
    Ahmet Eser
    Enis Ozkaya
    Cigdem Yayla Abide
    Tugba Eser
    Gulcin Yildirim Eser
    Faruk Abike
    Ahter Tanay Tayyar
    Mustafa Eroglu
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2019, 299 : 451 - 457
  • [46] A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Wilkinson, Chris
    Adelson, Pamela
    Turnbull, Deborah
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2015, 15
  • [47] A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Chris Wilkinson
    Pamela Adelson
    Deborah Turnbull
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15
  • [48] Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature
    Jozwiak, Marta
    Rengerink, Katrien Oude
    Ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G.
    van Pampus, Maria G.
    Dijksterhuis, Marja G. K.
    de Graaf, Irene M.
    van der Post, Joris A. M.
    van der Salm, Paulien
    Scheepers, Hubertina C. J.
    Schuitemaker, Nico
    de Leeuwi, Jan Willem
    Mol, Ben W. J.
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 170 (01) : 137 - 145
  • [49] Women's experiences of outpatient induction of labour with double balloon catheter or prostaglandin pessary: A qualitative study
    Coates, Rose
    Cupples, Georgina
    Scamell, Amanda
    McCourt, Christine
    Bhide, Amarnath
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2021, 34 (04) : e406 - e415
  • [50] Induction of labour with a Foley catheter or oral misoprostol at term: the PROBAAT-II study, a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    ten Eikelder, Mieke L. G.
    Neervoort, Femke
    Rengerink, Katrien Oude
    Jozwiak, Marta
    de Leeuw, Jan-Willem
    de Graaf, Irene
    van Pampus, Maria G.
    Franssen, Maureen
    Oudijk, Martijn
    van der Salm, Paulien
    Woiski, Mallory
    Pernet, Paula J. M.
    Feitsma, A. Hanneke
    van Vliet, Huib
    Porath, Martina
    Roumen, Frans
    van Beek, Erik
    Versendaal, Hans
    Heres, Marion
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2013, 13