Induction of labour using prostaglandin E2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

被引:28
|
作者
Beckmann, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gibbons, K. [3 ]
Flenady, V [3 ]
Kumar, S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mater Hlth, Level 6 Duncombe Bldg,Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Mater Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Balloon; cervical ripening; labour; induced; mechanical methods; outpatient; prostaglandin; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.16030
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To compare clinical outcomes following induction of labour (IOL) using a balloon catheter and going home, versus prostaglandin (PG) as an inpatient. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Eight Australian maternity hospitals. Population Women with uncomplicated term singleton pregnancies undergoing IOL for low-risk indications including post-term, advanced maternal age and 'social' reasons. Methods Between September 2015 and October 2018, 347 women were randomised to a balloon outpatient group and 348 to a PG inpatient group. The PG group received Dinoprostone, either 2 mg gel or 10 mg controlled-release tape. The balloon group had a double-balloon catheter inserted and went home. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was a composite neonatal measure comprising nursery admission, intubation/cardiac compressions, acidaemia, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, seizure, infection, pulmonary hypertension, stillbirth or death. Clinical and process outcomes are reported. Results There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcome comparing balloon with PG (18.6% versus 25.8%; relative risk = 0.77, 95% CI 0.51-1.02; P = 0.070), cord arterial pH <7.10 (3.5% versus 9.2%; P = 0.072), nursery admissions (12.6% versus 15.5%; P = 0.379), neonatal antibiotic use (12.1% versus 17.6%; P = 0.103), or mode of birth. Nulliparous women in the balloon group had lower rates of the primary outcome (20.4% versus 31.0%;P = 0.032); Parous women were less likely to have an unassisted vaginal birth (77.6% versus 92.3%; P = 0.045). Conclusions Balloon catheters may be a superior method of cervical priming for nulliparous women, whereas this may not be the case for parous women. It is feasible that nulliparous women go home after commencing balloon catheter IOL, and the likelihood of adverse outcomes is low. Tweetable abstract Multicentre trial shows outpatient induction using balloon catheter is safe and feasible for nulliparous women.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 579
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing the safety in the first 12 h, efficacy and maternal satisfaction of a double balloon catheter and prostaglandin pessary for induction of labour
    Grace Ng, Yang Huang
    Aminuddin, Anisa Aisyah
    Tan, Toh Lick
    Kuppusamy, Ramesh
    Tagore, Shephali
    Yeo, George Seow Heong
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 305 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [22] Inpatient versus outpatient double balloon catheter induction of labour satisfaction: A prospective cohort study
    Medina Mallen, M.
    Bailon, M.
    Cruz, M.
    Olmos, D.
    Flores, M.
    Llurba, E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2024, 54
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness of term induction of labour using inpatient prostaglandin gel versus outpatient Foley catheter
    Austin, Kathryn
    Chambers, Georgina M.
    de Abreu Lourenco, Richard
    Madan, Arushi
    Susic, Daniella
    Henry, Amanda
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 55 (05): : 440 - 445
  • [24] Re: A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 (OPRA study) Comments on outpatient cervical ripening
    Ryu, Aeli
    Kim, Tae-Hee
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (12) : 2049 - 2050
  • [25] Assessment of Maternal Satisfaction of Outpatient Balloon Catheter and Inpatient Prostaglandin for Cervical Ripening: A Secondary Outcome of the OBLIGE Randomised Controlled Trial
    Robertson, E.
    Thompson, J.
    Cronin, R.
    Wise, M.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 63 : 65 - 65
  • [26] Induction of labour using balloon catheter and prostaglandin gel
    Brown, Jacqueline
    Beckmann, Michael
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 57 (01): : 68 - 73
  • [27] Foley catheter silicone versus latex for term outpatient induction of labour: A randomised trial
    McGee, Therese M.
    Gidaszewski, Beata
    Khajehei, Marjan
    Tse, Toni
    Gibbs, Emma
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 59 (02): : 235 - 242
  • [28] Re: A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 (OPRA study) Comments on outpatient cervical ripening Reply
    Wilkinson, Chris
    Turnbull, Deborah
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (12) : 2050 - 2050
  • [29] Intravaginal prostaglandin E2 versus, double balloon catheter for labor induction in term isolated oligohydramnios
    Shechter-Maor, Gil
    Biron-Shental, Tal
    Haran, Gabi
    Ganor-Paz, Yael
    Fejgin, Moshe
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S78 - S79
  • [30] A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction
    Prager, M.
    Eneroth-Grimfors, E.
    Edlund, M.
    Marions, L.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (11) : 1443 - 1450