Induction of labour using prostaglandin E2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

被引:28
|
作者
Beckmann, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gibbons, K. [3 ]
Flenady, V [3 ]
Kumar, S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mater Hlth, Level 6 Duncombe Bldg,Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Mater Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Balloon; cervical ripening; labour; induced; mechanical methods; outpatient; prostaglandin; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.16030
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To compare clinical outcomes following induction of labour (IOL) using a balloon catheter and going home, versus prostaglandin (PG) as an inpatient. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Eight Australian maternity hospitals. Population Women with uncomplicated term singleton pregnancies undergoing IOL for low-risk indications including post-term, advanced maternal age and 'social' reasons. Methods Between September 2015 and October 2018, 347 women were randomised to a balloon outpatient group and 348 to a PG inpatient group. The PG group received Dinoprostone, either 2 mg gel or 10 mg controlled-release tape. The balloon group had a double-balloon catheter inserted and went home. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was a composite neonatal measure comprising nursery admission, intubation/cardiac compressions, acidaemia, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, seizure, infection, pulmonary hypertension, stillbirth or death. Clinical and process outcomes are reported. Results There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcome comparing balloon with PG (18.6% versus 25.8%; relative risk = 0.77, 95% CI 0.51-1.02; P = 0.070), cord arterial pH <7.10 (3.5% versus 9.2%; P = 0.072), nursery admissions (12.6% versus 15.5%; P = 0.379), neonatal antibiotic use (12.1% versus 17.6%; P = 0.103), or mode of birth. Nulliparous women in the balloon group had lower rates of the primary outcome (20.4% versus 31.0%;P = 0.032); Parous women were less likely to have an unassisted vaginal birth (77.6% versus 92.3%; P = 0.045). Conclusions Balloon catheters may be a superior method of cervical priming for nulliparous women, whereas this may not be the case for parous women. It is feasible that nulliparous women go home after commencing balloon catheter IOL, and the likelihood of adverse outcomes is low. Tweetable abstract Multicentre trial shows outpatient induction using balloon catheter is safe and feasible for nulliparous women.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 579
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial
    Henry, Amanda
    Madan, Arushi
    Reid, Rachel
    Tracy, Sally K.
    Austin, Kathryn
    Welsh, Alec
    Challis, Daniel
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2013, 13
  • [2] Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial
    Amanda Henry
    Arushi Madan
    Rachel Reid
    Sally K Tracy
    Kathryn Austin
    Alec Welsh
    Daniel Challis
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 13
  • [3] Outpatient balloon catheter vs inpatient prostaglandin for induction of labour (OBLIGE): a randomised controlled trial
    Wise, Michelle R.
    Marriott, Joy
    Battin, Malcolm
    Thompson, John M. D.
    Stitely, Michael
    Sadler, Lynn
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [4] Outpatient balloon catheter vs inpatient prostaglandin for induction of labour (OBLIGE): a randomised controlled trial
    Michelle R. Wise
    Joy Marriott
    Malcolm Battin
    John M. D. Thompson
    Michael Stitely
    Lynn Sadler
    Trials, 21
  • [5] Prostaglandin E2, intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical balloon catheter for induction of labour at term, a randomised controlled trial
    Zahoor, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 : 147 - 147
  • [6] Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial
    Jozwiak, Marta
    Rengerink, Katrien Oude
    Benthem, Marjan
    van Beek, Erik
    Dijksterhuis, Marja G. K.
    de Graaf, Irene M.
    van Huizen, Marloes E.
    Oudijk, Martijn A.
    Papatsonis, Dimitri N. M.
    Perquin, Denise A. M.
    Porath, Martina
    van der Post, Joris A. M.
    Rijnders, Robbert J. P.
    Scheepers, Hubertina C. J.
    Spaanderman, Marc E. A.
    van Pampus, Maria G.
    de Leeuw, Jan Willem
    Mol, Ben W. J.
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M.
    LANCET, 2011, 378 (9809): : 2095 - 2103
  • [7] Prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel or tablets for the induction of labour at term: a randomised controlled trial
    Bennett, P.
    Taher, S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (13) : 1680 - 1681
  • [8] Outpatient Versus Inpatient Catheter Balloon Cervical Ripening - A Randomised Trial
    Chen, V.
    Sheehan, P.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 59 : 39 - 40
  • [9] Prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel or tablets for the induction of labour at term: a randomised controlled trial
    Taher, S. E.
    Inder, J. W.
    Soltan, S. A.
    Eliahoo, J.
    Edmonds, D. K.
    Bennett, P. R.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (06) : 719 - 725
  • [10] A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 (OPRA study)
    Wilkinson, C.
    Bryce, R.
    Adelson, P.
    Turnbull, D.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (01) : 94 - 104