Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique for Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Younger Than 55 Years: A Prospective Comparative Study

被引:40
|
作者
Hantes, Michael E. [1 ]
Ono, Yohei [2 ]
Raoulis, Vasilios A. [1 ]
Doxariotis, Nikolaos [1 ]
Venouziou, Aaron [1 ]
Zibis, Aristidis [1 ]
Vlychou, Marianna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Thessalia, Sch Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Larisa, Greece
[2] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[3] Univ Thessalia, Sch Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Larisa, Greece
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2018年 / 46卷 / 01期
关键词
shoulder; rotator cuff repair; single row; double row; tendon healing; arthroscopy; young population; STRUCTURAL OUTCOMES; REPAIR TECHNIQUES; INTEGRITY; METAANALYSIS; RETEAR; MINIMUM; TENDON; RATES;
D O I
10.1177/0363546517728718
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: When arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is performed on a young patient, long-lasting structural and functional tendon integrity is desired. A fixation technique that potentially provides superior tendon healing should be considered for the younger population to achieve long-term clinical success. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to compare the radiological and clinical midterm results between single-row and doublerow (ie, suture bridge) fixation techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients younger than 55 years. We hypothesized that a double-row technique would lead to improved tendon healing, resulting in superior mid-to long-term clinical outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A consecutive series of 66 patients younger than 55 years with a medium to large full-thickness tear of supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons who underwent arthroscopic single-row or double-row (ie, suture bridge) repair were enrolled and prospectively observed. Thirty-four and 32 patients were assigned to single-row and double-row groups, respectively. Postoperatively, tendon integrity was assessed by MRI following Sugaya's classification at a minimum of 12 months, and clinical outcomes were assessed with the Constant score and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score at a minimum of 2 years. Results: Mean follow-up time was 46 months (range, 28-50 months). A higher tendon healing rate was obtained in the double-row group compared with the single-row group (84% and 61%, respectively [P < . 05]). Although no difference in outcome scores was observed between the 2 techniques, patients with healed tendon demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared with patients who had retorn tendon (UCLA score, 34.2 and 27.6, respectively [P < .05]; Constant score, 94 and 76, respectively [P < . 05]). Conclusion: The double-row repair technique potentially provides superior tendon healing compared with the single-row technique. Double-row repair should be considered for patients younger than 55 years with medium to large rotator cuff tears.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 121
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does the Literature Support Double-Row Suture Anchor Fixation for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair? A Systematic Review Comparing Double-Row and Single-Row Suture Anchor Configuration
    Nho, Shane J.
    Slabaugh, Mark A.
    Seroyer, Shane T.
    Grumet, Robert C.
    Wilson, Joseph B.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    Bach, Bernard R., Jr.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2009, 25 (11): : 1319 - 1328
  • [42] Response to "Meta-analysis comparing single-row and double-row repair techniques in the arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears''
    Xu, Caiqi
    Zhao, Jinzhong
    Li, Dingfeng
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (09) : E226 - E227
  • [43] Regarding "Meta-analysis comparing single-row and double-row repair techniques in the arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears''
    Faulkner, Nathan D.
    Getelman, Mark H.
    Burns, Joseph P.
    Bahk, Michael S.
    Karzel, Ronald P.
    Snyder, Stephen J.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (09) : E223 - E225
  • [44] Modified Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique With Double-Row Biceps Tenodesis for Massive Rotator Cuff Tear
    Maalouly, Joseph
    Aouad, Dany
    Tawk, Antonios
    El Rassi, Georges
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2020, 9 (06): : E829 - E835
  • [45] Single-Row or Double-Row Fixation Technique for Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Qiang
    Ge, Heng'an
    Zhou, Jiaojiao
    Yuan, Chaoqun
    Chen, Kai
    Cheng, Biao
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (07):
  • [46] Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair: A Meta-analysis of the Randomized Clinical Trials
    Sheibani-Rad, Shahin
    Giveans, M. Russell
    Arnoczky, Steven Paul
    Bedi, Asheesh
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2013, 29 (02): : 343 - 348
  • [47] Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions - Single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair
    Lorbach, Olaf
    Bachelier, Felix
    Vees, Jochen
    Kohn, Dieter
    Pape, Dietrich
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (08): : 1504 - 1510
  • [48] Arthroscopic Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair: Is It the Same as Single-Row Repair Regarding Clinical Outcomes?
    Li, Xue
    Yu, Bin
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2013, 29 (09): : 1464 - 1465
  • [49] Comparison between single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study
    Milano, Giuseppe
    Grasso, Andrea
    Zarelli, Donatella
    Deriu, Laura
    Cillo, Mario
    Fabbriciani, Carlo
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2008, 16 (01) : 75 - 80
  • [50] Comparison of arthroscopic suture-bridge technique and double-row technique for treating rotator cuff tears A PRISMA meta-analysis
    Ren, Yi-Ming
    Zhang, Hong-Bin
    Duan, Yuan-Hui
    Sun, Yun-Bo
    Yang, Tao
    Tian, Meng-Qiang
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (20)