Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique for Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Younger Than 55 Years: A Prospective Comparative Study

被引:40
|
作者
Hantes, Michael E. [1 ]
Ono, Yohei [2 ]
Raoulis, Vasilios A. [1 ]
Doxariotis, Nikolaos [1 ]
Venouziou, Aaron [1 ]
Zibis, Aristidis [1 ]
Vlychou, Marianna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Thessalia, Sch Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Larisa, Greece
[2] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[3] Univ Thessalia, Sch Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Larisa, Greece
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2018年 / 46卷 / 01期
关键词
shoulder; rotator cuff repair; single row; double row; tendon healing; arthroscopy; young population; STRUCTURAL OUTCOMES; REPAIR TECHNIQUES; INTEGRITY; METAANALYSIS; RETEAR; MINIMUM; TENDON; RATES;
D O I
10.1177/0363546517728718
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: When arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is performed on a young patient, long-lasting structural and functional tendon integrity is desired. A fixation technique that potentially provides superior tendon healing should be considered for the younger population to achieve long-term clinical success. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to compare the radiological and clinical midterm results between single-row and doublerow (ie, suture bridge) fixation techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients younger than 55 years. We hypothesized that a double-row technique would lead to improved tendon healing, resulting in superior mid-to long-term clinical outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A consecutive series of 66 patients younger than 55 years with a medium to large full-thickness tear of supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons who underwent arthroscopic single-row or double-row (ie, suture bridge) repair were enrolled and prospectively observed. Thirty-four and 32 patients were assigned to single-row and double-row groups, respectively. Postoperatively, tendon integrity was assessed by MRI following Sugaya's classification at a minimum of 12 months, and clinical outcomes were assessed with the Constant score and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score at a minimum of 2 years. Results: Mean follow-up time was 46 months (range, 28-50 months). A higher tendon healing rate was obtained in the double-row group compared with the single-row group (84% and 61%, respectively [P < . 05]). Although no difference in outcome scores was observed between the 2 techniques, patients with healed tendon demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared with patients who had retorn tendon (UCLA score, 34.2 and 27.6, respectively [P < .05]; Constant score, 94 and 76, respectively [P < . 05]). Conclusion: The double-row repair technique potentially provides superior tendon healing compared with the single-row technique. Double-row repair should be considered for patients younger than 55 years with medium to large rotator cuff tears.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 121
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Arthroscopic repair of partial-thickness articular surface rotator cuff tears: single-row transtendon technique versus double-row suture bridge (transosseous equivalent) fixation: results from a prospective randomized study
    Zafra, Manuel
    Uceda, Pilar
    Munoz-Luna, Francisco
    Munoz-Lopez, Rafael C.
    Font, Pilar
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2020, 140 (08) : 1065 - 1071
  • [22] Single-Row Repair Versus Double-Row Repair of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears
    Prasathaporn, Niti
    Kuptniratsaikul, Somsak
    Kongrukgreatiyos, Kitiphong
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (07): : 978 - 985
  • [23] Arthroscopic double-row repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears using a suture bridge technique
    Bales, Chris
    Anderson, Kyle
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2007, 15 (03) : 144 - 149
  • [24] Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Double-Row Transosseous Equivalent Suture Bridge Technique
    Abdelshahed, Mina
    Mahure, Siddharth A.
    Kaplan, Daniel J.
    Mollon, Brent
    Zuckerman, Joseph D.
    Kwon, Young W.
    Rokito, Andrew S.
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2016, 5 (06): : E1297 - E1304
  • [25] Outcomes of Single-Row and Double-Row Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review
    Saridakis, Paul
    Jones, Grant
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (03): : 732 - 742
  • [26] Single-Row Versus Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair: The Controversy Continues
    Lubowitz, James H.
    Provencher, Matthew T.
    Poehling, Gary G.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (07):
  • [27] Retear Patterns After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Single-Row Versus Suture Bridge Technique
    Cho, Nam Su
    Yi, Jin Woong
    Lee, Bong Gun
    Rhee, Yong Girl
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (04): : 664 - 671
  • [28] Clinical Outcomes of Double-Row Versus Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repairs
    Wall, Lindley B.
    Keener, Jay D.
    Brophy, Robert H.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2009, 25 (11): : 1312 - 1318
  • [29] Incidence of Retear With Double-Row Versus Single-Row Rotator Cuff Repair
    Shen, Chong
    Tang, Zhi-Hong
    Hu, Jun-Zu
    Zou, Guo-Yao
    Xiao, Rong-Chi
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2014, 37 (11) : E1006 - E1013
  • [30] Single-row Versus Double-row Rotator Cuff Repair: Techniques and Outcomes
    Dines, Joshua S.
    Bedi, Asheesh
    ElAttrache, Neal S.
    Dines, David M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2010, 18 (02) : 83 - 93