Arthroscopic Single-Row Versus Double-Row Suture Bridge Technique for Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Younger Than 55 Years: A Prospective Comparative Study

被引:40
|
作者
Hantes, Michael E. [1 ]
Ono, Yohei [2 ]
Raoulis, Vasilios A. [1 ]
Doxariotis, Nikolaos [1 ]
Venouziou, Aaron [1 ]
Zibis, Aristidis [1 ]
Vlychou, Marianna [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Thessalia, Sch Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Larisa, Greece
[2] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[3] Univ Thessalia, Sch Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Larisa, Greece
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2018年 / 46卷 / 01期
关键词
shoulder; rotator cuff repair; single row; double row; tendon healing; arthroscopy; young population; STRUCTURAL OUTCOMES; REPAIR TECHNIQUES; INTEGRITY; METAANALYSIS; RETEAR; MINIMUM; TENDON; RATES;
D O I
10.1177/0363546517728718
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: When arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is performed on a young patient, long-lasting structural and functional tendon integrity is desired. A fixation technique that potentially provides superior tendon healing should be considered for the younger population to achieve long-term clinical success. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to compare the radiological and clinical midterm results between single-row and doublerow (ie, suture bridge) fixation techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients younger than 55 years. We hypothesized that a double-row technique would lead to improved tendon healing, resulting in superior mid-to long-term clinical outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A consecutive series of 66 patients younger than 55 years with a medium to large full-thickness tear of supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons who underwent arthroscopic single-row or double-row (ie, suture bridge) repair were enrolled and prospectively observed. Thirty-four and 32 patients were assigned to single-row and double-row groups, respectively. Postoperatively, tendon integrity was assessed by MRI following Sugaya's classification at a minimum of 12 months, and clinical outcomes were assessed with the Constant score and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score at a minimum of 2 years. Results: Mean follow-up time was 46 months (range, 28-50 months). A higher tendon healing rate was obtained in the double-row group compared with the single-row group (84% and 61%, respectively [P < . 05]). Although no difference in outcome scores was observed between the 2 techniques, patients with healed tendon demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared with patients who had retorn tendon (UCLA score, 34.2 and 27.6, respectively [P < .05]; Constant score, 94 and 76, respectively [P < . 05]). Conclusion: The double-row repair technique potentially provides superior tendon healing compared with the single-row technique. Double-row repair should be considered for patients younger than 55 years with medium to large rotator cuff tears.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 121
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair
    Mazzocca, AD
    Millett, PJ
    Guanche, CA
    Santangelo, SA
    Arciero, RA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (12): : 1861 - 1868
  • [2] Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomized clinical study
    Carbonel, Ignacio
    Antonio Martinez, Angel
    Calvo, Angel
    Ripalda, Jorge
    Herrera, Antonio
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2012, 36 (09) : 1877 - 1883
  • [3] Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomized clinical study
    Ignacio Carbonel
    Angel Antonio Martinez
    Angel Calvo
    Jorge Ripalda
    Antonio Herrera
    International Orthopaedics, 2012, 36 : 1877 - 1883
  • [4] Comparative Analysis of Single-Row Versus Double-Row Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears
    Pennington, William T.
    Gibbons, David J.
    Bartz, Brian A.
    Dodd, Maggie
    Daun, James
    Klinger, Jonathan
    Popovich, Milodrag
    Butler, Brian
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2010, 26 (11): : 1419 - 1426
  • [5] Functional and Structural Outcomes of Single-Row Versus Double-Row Versus Combined Double-Row and Suture-Bridge Repair for Rotator Cuff Tears
    Mihata, Teruhisa
    Watanabe, Chisato
    Fukunishi, Kunimoto
    Ohue, Mutsumi
    Tsujimura, Tomoyuki
    Fujiwara, Kenta
    Kinoshita, Mitsuo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (10): : 2091 - 2098
  • [6] Functional and structural comparisons of the arthroscopic knotless double-row suture bridge and single-row repair for anterosuperior rotator cuff tears
    Ide, Junji
    Karasugi, Tatsuki
    Okamoto, Nobukazu
    Taniwaki, Takuya
    Oka, Kiyoshi
    Mizuta, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (10) : 1544 - 1554
  • [7] Single-Row Versus Double-Row Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study
    Grasso, Andrea
    Milano, Giuseppe
    Salvatore, Matteo
    Falcone, Gianluca
    Deriu, Laura
    Fabbriciani, Carlo
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2009, 25 (01): : 4 - 12
  • [8] A cost analysis of single-row versus double-row and suture bridge rotator cuff repair methods
    Bisson, Leslie
    Zivaljevic, Nikola
    Sanders, Samuel
    Pula, David
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2015, 23 (02) : 487 - 493
  • [9] A cost analysis of single-row versus double-row and suture bridge rotator cuff repair methods
    Leslie Bisson
    Nikola Zivaljevic
    Samuel Sanders
    David Pula
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2015, 23 : 487 - 493
  • [10] Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair
    Kim, DH
    ElAttrachet, NS
    Tibone, JE
    Jun, BJ
    DeLaMora, SN
    Kvitnet, RS
    Lee, TQ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (03): : 407 - 414