Deep treatment-adaptive network for causal inference

被引:3
|
作者
Li, Qian [1 ]
Wang, Zhichao [2 ]
Liu, Shaowu [3 ]
Li, Gang [4 ]
Xu, Guandong [3 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Elect Engn Comp & Math Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Elect Engn & Telecommun, S Sydney, Australia
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Comp Sci, Data Sci & Machine Intelligence Lab, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Deakin Univ, Ctr Cyber Secur Res & Innovat, Geelong, Vic 3216, Australia
来源
VLDB JOURNAL | 2022年 / 31卷 / 05期
关键词
Causal inference; Treatment effect estimation; Deep neural networks; PROPENSITY SCORE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1007/s00778-021-00724-y
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Causal inference is capable of estimating the treatment effect (i.e., the causal effect of treatment on the outcome) to benefit the decision making in various domains. One fundamental challenge in this research is that the treatment assignment bias in observational data. To increase the validity of observational studies on causal inference, representation-based methods as the state-of-the-art have demonstrated the superior performance of treatment effect estimation. Most representation-based methods assume all observed covariates are pre-treatment (i.e., not affected by the treatment) and learn a balanced representation from these observed covariates for estimating treatment effect. Unfortunately, this assumption is often too strict a requirement in practice, as some covariates are changed by doing an intervention on treatment (i.e., post-treatment). By contrast, the balanced representation learned from unchanged covariates thus biases the treatment effect estimation. In light of this, we propose a deep treatment-adaptive architecture (DTANet) that can address the post-treatment covariates and provide a unbiased treatment effect estimation. Generally speaking, the contributions of this work are threefold. First, our theoretical results guarantee DTANet can identify treatment effect from observations. Second, we introduce a novel regularization of orthogonality projection to ensure that the learned confounding representation is invariant and not being contaminated by the treatment, meanwhile mediate variable representation is informative and discriminative for predicting the outcome. Finally, we build on the optimal transport and learn a treatment-invariant representation for the unobserved confounders to alleviate the confounding bias.
引用
收藏
页码:1127 / 1142
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Deep causal inference for understanding the impact of meteorological variations on traffic
    Li, Can
    Liu, Wei
    Yang, Hai
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 165
  • [42] Causal Effect Inference with Deep Latent-Variable Models
    Louizos, Christos
    Shalit, Uri
    Mooij, Joris
    Sontag, David
    Zemel, Richard
    Welling, Max
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 30 (NIPS 2017), 2017, 30
  • [43] Causal Inference with Conditional Instruments Using Deep Generative Models
    Cheng, Debo
    Xu, Ziqi
    Li, Jiuyong
    Liu, Lin
    Liu, Jixue
    Thuc Duy Le
    THIRTY-SEVENTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 37 NO 6, 2023, : 7122 - 7130
  • [44] Hi-CI: Deep Causal Inference in High Dimensions
    Sharma, Ankit
    Gupta, Garima
    Prasad, Ranjitha
    Chatterjee, Arnab
    Vig, Lovekesh
    Shroff, Gautam
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 KDD WORKSHOP ON CAUSAL DISCOVERY, VOL 127, 2020, 127
  • [45] Deep Knowledge Tracing Integrating Temporal Causal Inference and PINN
    Lu, Faming
    Li, Yingran
    Bao, Yunxia
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (03):
  • [46] Server load and network-aware adaptive deep learning inference offloading for edge platforms
    Ahn, Jungmo
    Lee, Youngki
    Ahn, Jeongseob
    Ko, JeongGil
    INTERNET OF THINGS, 2023, 21
  • [47] Energy-efficient cooperative inference via adaptive deep neural network splitting at the edge
    Labriji, Ibtissam
    Merluzzi, Mattia
    Airod, Fatima Ezzahra
    Strinati, Emilio Calvanese
    ICC 2023-IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, : 1712 - 1717
  • [48] Causal Inference
    Kuang, Kun
    Li, Lian
    Geng, Zhi
    Xu, Lei
    Zhang, Kun
    Liao, Beishui
    Huang, Huaxin
    Ding, Peng
    Miao, Wang
    Jiang, Zhichao
    ENGINEERING, 2020, 6 (03) : 253 - 263
  • [49] CAUSAL INFERENCE
    ROTHMAN, KJ
    LANES, S
    ROBINS, J
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 4 (06) : 555 - 556
  • [50] PROPENSITY SCORE REGRESSION FOR CAUSAL INFERENCE WITH TREATMENT HETEROGENEITY
    Wu, Peng
    Han, Shasha
    Tong, Xingwei
    Li, Runze
    STATISTICA SINICA, 2024, 34 (02) : 747 - 769