Deep treatment-adaptive network for causal inference

被引:3
|
作者
Li, Qian [1 ]
Wang, Zhichao [2 ]
Liu, Shaowu [3 ]
Li, Gang [4 ]
Xu, Guandong [3 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Elect Engn Comp & Math Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Elect Engn & Telecommun, S Sydney, Australia
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Comp Sci, Data Sci & Machine Intelligence Lab, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Deakin Univ, Ctr Cyber Secur Res & Innovat, Geelong, Vic 3216, Australia
来源
VLDB JOURNAL | 2022年 / 31卷 / 05期
关键词
Causal inference; Treatment effect estimation; Deep neural networks; PROPENSITY SCORE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1007/s00778-021-00724-y
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Causal inference is capable of estimating the treatment effect (i.e., the causal effect of treatment on the outcome) to benefit the decision making in various domains. One fundamental challenge in this research is that the treatment assignment bias in observational data. To increase the validity of observational studies on causal inference, representation-based methods as the state-of-the-art have demonstrated the superior performance of treatment effect estimation. Most representation-based methods assume all observed covariates are pre-treatment (i.e., not affected by the treatment) and learn a balanced representation from these observed covariates for estimating treatment effect. Unfortunately, this assumption is often too strict a requirement in practice, as some covariates are changed by doing an intervention on treatment (i.e., post-treatment). By contrast, the balanced representation learned from unchanged covariates thus biases the treatment effect estimation. In light of this, we propose a deep treatment-adaptive architecture (DTANet) that can address the post-treatment covariates and provide a unbiased treatment effect estimation. Generally speaking, the contributions of this work are threefold. First, our theoretical results guarantee DTANet can identify treatment effect from observations. Second, we introduce a novel regularization of orthogonality projection to ensure that the learned confounding representation is invariant and not being contaminated by the treatment, meanwhile mediate variable representation is informative and discriminative for predicting the outcome. Finally, we build on the optimal transport and learn a treatment-invariant representation for the unobserved confounders to alleviate the confounding bias.
引用
收藏
页码:1127 / 1142
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adaptive Deep Neural Network Ensemble for Inference-as-a-Service on Edge Computing Platforms
    Bai, Yang
    Chen, Lixing
    Zhang, Letian
    Abdel-Mottaleb, Mohamed
    Xu, Jie
    2021 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE AD HOC AND SMART SYSTEMS (MASS 2021), 2021, : 27 - 35
  • [32] Causal Transcription Regulatory Network Inference Using Enhancer Activity as a Causal Anchor
    Vipin, Deepti
    Wang, Lingfei
    Devailly, Guillaume
    Michoel, Tom
    Joshi, Anagha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2018, 19 (11)
  • [33] Causal Inference in Longitudinal Studies Using Causal Bayesian Network with Latent Variables
    Phat Huynh
    Irish, Leah
    Yadav, Om Prakash
    Setty, Arveity
    Le, Trung Tim Q.
    2022 68TH ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS 2022), 2022,
  • [34] Causal inference under multiple versions of treatment
    VanderWeele, Tyler J.
    Hernan, Miguel A.
    JOURNAL OF CAUSAL INFERENCE, 2013, 1 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [35] Inference of a Boolean Network From Causal Logic Implications
    Maheshwari, Parul
    Assmann, Sarah M.
    Albert, Reka
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 13
  • [36] Lower Bounds on Information Requirements for Causal Network Inference
    Kang, Xiaohan
    Hajek, Bruce
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION THEORY (ISIT), 2021, : 754 - 759
  • [37] A Causal Inference Approach to Network Meta-Analysis
    Schnitzer, Mireille E.
    Steele, Russell J.
    Bally, Michele
    Shrier, Ian
    JOURNAL OF CAUSAL INFERENCE, 2016, 4 (02)
  • [38] Causal Network Inference Via Group Sparse Regularization
    Bolstad, Andrew
    Van Veen, Barry D.
    Nowak, Robert
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2011, 59 (06) : 2628 - 2641
  • [39] Adaptive fuzzy inference neural network
    Iyatomi, H
    Hagiwara, M
    PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2004, 37 (10) : 2049 - 2057
  • [40] Outcome-adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference
    Shortreed, Susan M.
    Ertefaie, Ashkan
    BIOMETRICS, 2017, 73 (04) : 1111 - 1122