Implementation of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) for public drinking water supplies: Systematic review

被引:56
|
作者
Owens, Christopher E. L. [1 ,2 ]
Angles, Mark L. [3 ]
Cox, Peter T. [2 ]
Byleveld, Paul M. [4 ]
Osborne, Nicholas J. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Rahman, Md Bayzid [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Sydney Water Corp, Parramatta, NSW 2124, Australia
[3] Water Angles Consulting, Vaucluse, NSW 2030, Australia
[4] NSW Hlth, Water Unit, Sydney, NSW 2059, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Fac Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
[6] Univ Exeter, Royal Cornwall Hosp, European Ctr Environm & Human Hlth, Truro TR1 3HD, England
关键词
Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA); Systematic review; Drinking water; Distributed water supply; SURFACE-WATER; GASTROINTESTINAL ILLNESS; INFECTION RISK; HEALTH-RISK; DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS; CRYPTOSPORIDIUM; GIARDIA; QUALITY; MANAGEMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2020.115614
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the more than 15 years since its introduction, quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) has become a widely used technique for assessing population health risk posed by waterborne pathogens. However, the variation in approaches taken for QMRA in relation to drinking water supply is not well understood. This systematic review identifies, categorises, and critically synthesises peer-reviewed and academic case studies of QMRA implementation for existing distributed public drinking water supplies. Thirty-nine English-language, peer-reviewed and academic studies published from 2003 to 2019 were identified. Key findings were synthesised in narrative form. The overall designs of the included studies varied widely, as did the assumptions used in risk calculation, especially in relation to pathogen dose. There was also substantial variation in the degree to which the use of location-specific data weighed with the use of assumptions when performing risk calculation. In general, the included studies' complexity did not appear to be associated with greater result certainty. Factors relating to pathogen dose were commonly influential on risk estimates whereas dose-response parameters tended to be of low relative influence. In two of the included studies, use of the 'susceptible fraction' factor was inconsistent with recognised guidance and potentially led to the underestimation of risk. While approaches and assumptions used in QMRA need not be standardised, improvement in the reporting of QMRA results and uncertainties would be beneficial. It is recommended that future authors consider the water supply QMRA reporting checklist developed for the current review. Consideration of the broad types of uncertainty relevant to QMRA is also recommended. Policy-makers should consider emergent discussion on acute microbial health-based targets when setting normative guidelines. The continued representation of QMRA case studies within peer-reviewed and academic literature would also enhance future implementation. Further research is needed on the optimisation of QMRA resourcing given the application context. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) tool for modelling pathogen infection risk to wastewater treatment plant workers
    Heida, Ashley
    Maal-Bared, Rasha
    Veillette, Marc
    Duchaine, Caroline
    Reynolds, Kelly A.
    Ashraf, Ahamed
    Ogunseye, Olusola O.
    Jung, Yoonhee
    Shulman, Lester
    Ikner, Luisa
    Betancourt, Walter
    Hamilton, Kerry A.
    Wilson, Amanda M.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2024, 260
  • [32] Pathogen monitoring offers questionable protection against drinking-water risks: a QMRA (Quantitative Microbial Risk Analysis) approach to assess management strategies
    Signor, R. S.
    Ashbolt, N. J.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 54 (03) : 261 - 268
  • [33] Quantitative microbial risk assessment of distributed drinking water using faecal indicator incidence and concentrations
    van Lieverloo, J. Hein M.
    Blokker, E. J. Mirjam
    Medema, Gertjan
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2007, 5 : 131 - 149
  • [34] Predicting pathogen risks to aid beach management: The real value of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA)
    Ashbolt, Nicholas J.
    Schoen, Mary E.
    Soller, Jeffrey A.
    Rose, David J.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2010, 44 (16) : 4692 - 4703
  • [35] Quantitative microbial risk assessment and its applications in small water systems: A review
    Hamouda, Mohamed A.
    Jin, Xiaohui
    Xu, Heli
    Chen, Fei
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 645 : 993 - 1002
  • [36] Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment to Estimate the Health Risk in Urban Drinking Water Systems of Mysore, Karnataka, India
    George, Jessen
    An, Wei
    Joshi, Dev
    Zhang, Dongqing
    Yang, Min
    Suriyanarayanan, S.
    WATER QUALITY EXPOSURE AND HEALTH, 2015, 7 (03): : 331 - 338
  • [37] Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment to Estimate the Health Risk in Urban Drinking Water Systems of Mysore, Karnataka, India
    Jessen George
    Wei An
    Dev Joshi
    Dongqing Zhang
    Min Yang
    S. Suriyanarayanan
    Water Quality, Exposure and Health, 2015, 7 : 331 - 338
  • [38] Application of Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment to analyze the public health risk from poor drinking water quality in a low income area in Accra, Ghana
    Machdar, E.
    van der Steen, N. P.
    Raschid-Sally, L.
    Lens, P. N. L.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 449 : 134 - 142
  • [39] Multi-route risk assessment from trihalomethanes in drinking water supplies
    Basu, Mrittika
    Gupta, Sunil Kumar
    Singh, Gurdeep
    Mukhopadhyay, Ujjal
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2011, 178 (1-4) : 121 - 134
  • [40] Equity Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability and Risk in Drinking Water Supplies in Arid Regions
    Williams, Simone A.
    Megdal, Sharon B.
    Zuniga-Teran, Adriana A.
    Quanrud, David M.
    Christopherson, Gary
    WATER, 2024, 16 (23)