Implementation of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) for public drinking water supplies: Systematic review

被引:56
|
作者
Owens, Christopher E. L. [1 ,2 ]
Angles, Mark L. [3 ]
Cox, Peter T. [2 ]
Byleveld, Paul M. [4 ]
Osborne, Nicholas J. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Rahman, Md Bayzid [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Sydney Water Corp, Parramatta, NSW 2124, Australia
[3] Water Angles Consulting, Vaucluse, NSW 2030, Australia
[4] NSW Hlth, Water Unit, Sydney, NSW 2059, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Fac Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
[6] Univ Exeter, Royal Cornwall Hosp, European Ctr Environm & Human Hlth, Truro TR1 3HD, England
关键词
Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA); Systematic review; Drinking water; Distributed water supply; SURFACE-WATER; GASTROINTESTINAL ILLNESS; INFECTION RISK; HEALTH-RISK; DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS; CRYPTOSPORIDIUM; GIARDIA; QUALITY; MANAGEMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2020.115614
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the more than 15 years since its introduction, quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) has become a widely used technique for assessing population health risk posed by waterborne pathogens. However, the variation in approaches taken for QMRA in relation to drinking water supply is not well understood. This systematic review identifies, categorises, and critically synthesises peer-reviewed and academic case studies of QMRA implementation for existing distributed public drinking water supplies. Thirty-nine English-language, peer-reviewed and academic studies published from 2003 to 2019 were identified. Key findings were synthesised in narrative form. The overall designs of the included studies varied widely, as did the assumptions used in risk calculation, especially in relation to pathogen dose. There was also substantial variation in the degree to which the use of location-specific data weighed with the use of assumptions when performing risk calculation. In general, the included studies' complexity did not appear to be associated with greater result certainty. Factors relating to pathogen dose were commonly influential on risk estimates whereas dose-response parameters tended to be of low relative influence. In two of the included studies, use of the 'susceptible fraction' factor was inconsistent with recognised guidance and potentially led to the underestimation of risk. While approaches and assumptions used in QMRA need not be standardised, improvement in the reporting of QMRA results and uncertainties would be beneficial. It is recommended that future authors consider the water supply QMRA reporting checklist developed for the current review. Consideration of the broad types of uncertainty relevant to QMRA is also recommended. Policy-makers should consider emergent discussion on acute microbial health-based targets when setting normative guidelines. The continued representation of QMRA case studies within peer-reviewed and academic literature would also enhance future implementation. Further research is needed on the optimisation of QMRA resourcing given the application context. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On-plot drinking water supplies and health: A systematic review
    Overbo, Alycia
    Williams, Ashley R.
    Evans, Barbara
    Hunter, Paul R.
    Bartram, Jamie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYGIENE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 219 (4-5) : 317 - 330
  • [22] Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment (QMRA) of Workers Exposure to Bioaerosols at MSW Open Dumpsites
    Akpeimeh, G. F.
    Fletcher, L. A.
    Evans, B. E.
    Ibanga, I. E.
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2021, 41 (10) : 1911 - 1924
  • [23] RISK OF DISEASE DUE TO CONTAMINATION OF REFILL DRINKING WATER: USING QUANTITATIVE MICROBIAL RISK ASSESSMENT
    Alfian, Azyyati Ridha
    Firdani, Fea
    Sari, Putri Nilam
    SURANAREE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 30 (03):
  • [24] A Systematic Review of Beef Meat Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Models
    Tesson, Vincent
    Federighi, Michel
    Cummins, Enda
    Mota, Juliana de Oliveira
    Guillou, Sandrine
    Boue, Geraldine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (03)
  • [25] Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment of Cryptosporidiosis and Giardiasis from Very Small Private Water Supplies
    Hunter, Paul R.
    de Sylor, Marianna Anderle
    Risebro, Helen L.
    Nichols, Gordon L.
    Kay, David
    Hartemann, Philippe
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2011, 31 (02) : 228 - 236
  • [26] Quantitative microbial risk assessment of a drinking water - wastewater cross-connection simulation
    Mena, Kristina D.
    Mota, Linda C.
    Meckes, Mark C.
    Green, Christopher F.
    Hurd, William W.
    Gibbs, Shawn G.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2008, 7 (05) : 525 - 530
  • [27] Quantitative microbial risk assessment of Legionella pneumophila in a drinking water supply system in Israel
    Sharaby, Y.
    Rodriguez-Martinez, S.
    Hoefle, M. G.
    Brettar, I
    Halpern, M.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 671 : 404 - 410
  • [28] QMRA and water safety management: review of application in drinking water systems
    Petterson, S. R.
    Ashbolt, N. J.
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2016, 14 (04) : 571 - 589
  • [29] Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) of the work of manual pit emptiers, commonly known as bayakous
    Jean-Baptiste, Davidson
    Monette, Frederic
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 89 (11) : 3122 - 3132
  • [30] Implementation of safe drinking water supplies in Bangladesh
    Rammelt, C. F.
    Boes, J.
    NATURAL ARSENIC IN GROUNDWATER: OCCURRENCE, REMEDIATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, : 307 - 317