CACP: Classification Algorithms Comparison Pipeline

被引：3

作者：

Czmil, Sylwester ^{[1
]}

Kluska, Jacek ^{[1
]}

Czmil, Anna ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Rzeszow Univ Technol, Fac Elect & Comp Engn, Powstancow Warszawy 12, PL-35959 Rzeszow, Poland

来源：

SOFTWAREX | 2022年 / 19卷

关键词：

Supervised classification; Computational reproducibility; Classifier performance evaluation; Wilcoxon signed-rank test; CLASSIFIERS;

D O I：

10.1016/j.softx.2022.101134

中图分类号：

TP31 [计算机软件];

学科分类号：

081202 ; 0835 ;

摘要：

This paper presents a Classification Algorithms Comparison Pipeline (CACP) for comparing newly developed classification algorithms in Python with other commonly used classifiers to evaluate classification performance, reproducibility, and statistical reliability. CACP simplifies the entire classifier evaluation process. Code examples and output results are explained and detailed to provide the basics of the module and give an overview of its capabilities. The code is available on GitHub under the MIT license. ?? 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

引用

页数：6

共 50 条

[41] Comparison of YOLO Algorithms for Vehicle Accident Detection and Classification
Nusari, Ahmed N.
Alawi, Abdulfattah E. Ba
Bozkurt, Ferhat
Ozbek, Ibrahim Yucel
2024 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING SMART TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS, ESMARTA 2024, 2024, : 493 - 500
[42] Unsupervised algorithms for the automatic classification of EWS maps: a comparison
Di Palma, F
De Nicolao, G
Donzelli, OM
Miraglia, G
ISSM 2005: IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 253 - 256
[43] Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for ELINT Signals Classification
Perdoch, Jozef
Gazovova, Stanislava
Matousek, Zdenek
Ochodnicky, Jan
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 CONFERENCE ON NEW TRENDS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING (NTSP), 2020, : 93 - 100
[44] A COMPARISON OF ALGORITHMS FOR SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION USING HYPERSPECTRAL DATA
Kuznetsov, A. V.
Myasnikov, V. V.
COMPUTER OPTICS, 2014, 38 (03) : 494 - 502
[45] Comparison of SWAN and WISE menopausal status classification algorithms
Johnston, Janet M.
Colvin, Alicia
Johnson, B. Delia
Santoro, Nanette
Harlow, Sioban D.
Noel Bairey Merz, C.
Sutton-Tyrrell, Kim
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2006, 15 (10) : 1184 - 1194
[46] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Shelter Animal Classification
Mitrovic, Katarina
Milosevic, Danijela
Greconici, Marian
IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATICS (SACI 2019), 2019, : 211 - 216
[47] A Statistical Comparison of Classification Algorithms on a Single Data Set
Sibona, Christopher
Brickey, Jonalan
AMCIS 2012 PROCEEDINGS, 2012,
[48] A comparison of generic machine learning algorithms for image classification
Marée, R
Geurts, P
Visimberga, G
Piater, J
Wehenkel, L
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS XX, 2004, : 169 - 182
[49] A comparison on texture classification algorithms for remote sensing data
Xu, P
Dai, M
Chan, AK
IGARSS 2004: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-7: SCIENCE FOR SOCIETY: EXPLORING AND MANAGING A CHANGING PLANET, 2004, : 1057 - 1060
[50] Comparison of different classification algorithms for underwater target discrimination
Li, DH
Azimi-Sadjadi, MR
Robinson, M
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 2004, 15 (01): : 189 - 194

← 1 2 3 4 5 →