The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda

被引:70
|
作者
Abramsky, Tanya [1 ]
Devries, Karen M. [1 ]
Michau, Lori [2 ]
Nakuti, Janet [2 ]
Musuya, Tina [3 ]
Kyegombe, Nambusi [1 ]
Watts, Charlotte [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Gender Violence & Hlth Ctr, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, England
[2] Raising Voices, Kampala, Uganda
[3] Ctr Domest Violence Prevent, Kampala, Uganda
关键词
RURAL SOUTH-AFRICA; PREVENT VIOLENCE; HEALTH; HIV; ABUSE; RISK;
D O I
10.1136/jech-2015-206665
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health and human rights concern, though there is limited evidence on how to prevent it. This secondary analysis of data from the SASA! Study assesses the potential of a community mobilisation IPV prevention intervention to reduce overall prevalence of IPV, new onset of abuse (primary prevention) and continuation of prior abuse (secondary prevention). Methods A pair-matched cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 8 communities (4 intervention, 4 control) in Kampala, Uganda (2007-2012). Cross-sectional surveys of community members, 18-49 years old, were undertaken at baseline (n=1583) and 4 years postintervention implementation (n=2532). Outcomes relate to women's past year experiences of physical and sexual IPV, emotional aggression, controlling behaviours and fear of partner. An adjusted cluster-level intention-to-treat analysis compared outcomes in intervention and control communities at follow-up. Results At follow-up, all types of IPV (including severe forms of each) were lower in intervention communities compared with control communities. SASA! was associated with lower onset of abuse and lower continuation of prior abuse. Statistically significant effects were observed for continued physical IPV (adjusted risk ratio 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96); continued sexual IPV (0.68, 0.53 to 0.87); continued emotional aggression (0.68, 0.52 to 0.89); continued fear of partner (0.67, 0.51 to 0.89); and new onset of controlling behaviours (0.38, 0.23 to 0.62). Conclusions Community mobilisation is an effective means for both primary and secondary prevention of IPV. Further support should be given to the replication and scale up of SASA! and other similar interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 825
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Safe Pregnancy intervention for intimate partner violence: a randomised controlled trial in Norway among culturally diverse pregnant women
    Eva Marie Engebakken Flaathen
    Lena Henriksen
    Milada Cvancarova Småstuen
    Berit Schei
    Angela Taft
    Josef Noll
    Lisa Garnweidner-Holme
    Mirjam Lukasse
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22
  • [42] Risk factors for intimate partner violence in women in the Rakai Community Cohort Study, Uganda, from 2000 to 2009
    Fiona G Kouyoumdjian
    Liviana M Calzavara
    Susan J Bondy
    Patricia O’Campo
    David Serwadda
    Fred Nalugoda
    Joseph Kagaayi
    Godfrey Kigozi
    Maria Wawer
    Ronald Gray
    BMC Public Health, 13
  • [43] Impact of the Change Starts at Home Trial on Women's experience of intimate partner violence in Nepal
    Clark, Cari Jo
    Shrestha, Binita
    Ferguson, Gemma
    Shrestha, Prabin Nanicha
    Calvert, Collin
    Gupta, Jhumka
    Batayeh, Brian
    Bergenfeld, Irina
    Oakes, J. Michael
    SSM-POPULATION HEALTH, 2020, 10
  • [44] An intimate partner violence prevention intervention for men, women, and couples in Ethiopia: Additional findings on substance use and depressive symptoms from a cluster-randomized controlled trial
    Leight, Jessica
    Deyessa, Negussie
    Verani, Fabio
    Tewolde, Samuel
    Sharma, Vandana
    PLOS MEDICINE, 2020, 17 (08)
  • [45] Risk factors for intimate partner violence in women in the Rakai Community Cohort Study, Uganda, from 2000 to 2009
    Kouyoumdjian, Fiona G.
    Calzavara, Liviana M.
    Bondy, Susan J.
    O'Campo, Patricia
    Serwadda, David
    Nalugoda, Fred
    Kagaayi, Joseph
    Kigozi, Godfrey
    Wawer, Maria
    Gray, Ronald
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
  • [46] Effects of a violence prevention intervention in schools and surrounding communities: Secondary analysis of a cluster randomised-controlled trial in Uganda
    Merrill, Katherine G.
    Knight, Louise
    Namy, Sophie
    Allen, Elizabeth
    Naker, Dipak
    Devries, Karen M.
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2018, 84 : 182 - 195
  • [47] Women's entrepreneurship and intimate partner violence: A cluster randomized trial of microenterprise assistance and partner participation in post-conflict Uganda (vol 133, pg 177, 2015)
    Green, Eric P.
    Blattman, Christopher
    Jamison, Julian
    Annan, Jeannie
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2016, 148 : 139 - 141
  • [48] Experiences of Health and Health Care Among Women Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence: Qualitative Findings From Germany
    Larsen, Mandi M.
    Krohn, Julia
    Pueschel, Klaus
    Seifert, Dragana
    HEALTH CARE FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 35 (04) : 359 - 379
  • [49] Purpose-built intervention for mental health of Mainland Chinese immigrant women survivors of intimate partner violence: a randomised controlled trial (abridged secondary publication)
    Tiwari, A.
    Fong, D. Y. T.
    Yuen, F. K. H.
    Fung, H. Y. K. Yuk
    Pang, P. O. Y.
    Wong, J. Y. H.
    HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (06) : 7 - 9
  • [50] The Impact of Intimate Partner Violence on Women's Physical Health: Findings From the Missouri Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
    Bosch, Jeane
    Weaver, Terri L.
    Arnold, Lauren D.
    Clark, Eddie M.
    JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2017, 32 (22) : 3402 - 3419