The impact of SASA!, a community mobilisation intervention, on women's experiences of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from a cluster randomised trial in Kampala, Uganda

被引:70
|
作者
Abramsky, Tanya [1 ]
Devries, Karen M. [1 ]
Michau, Lori [2 ]
Nakuti, Janet [2 ]
Musuya, Tina [3 ]
Kyegombe, Nambusi [1 ]
Watts, Charlotte [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Gender Violence & Hlth Ctr, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, England
[2] Raising Voices, Kampala, Uganda
[3] Ctr Domest Violence Prevent, Kampala, Uganda
关键词
RURAL SOUTH-AFRICA; PREVENT VIOLENCE; HEALTH; HIV; ABUSE; RISK;
D O I
10.1136/jech-2015-206665
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health and human rights concern, though there is limited evidence on how to prevent it. This secondary analysis of data from the SASA! Study assesses the potential of a community mobilisation IPV prevention intervention to reduce overall prevalence of IPV, new onset of abuse (primary prevention) and continuation of prior abuse (secondary prevention). Methods A pair-matched cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 8 communities (4 intervention, 4 control) in Kampala, Uganda (2007-2012). Cross-sectional surveys of community members, 18-49 years old, were undertaken at baseline (n=1583) and 4 years postintervention implementation (n=2532). Outcomes relate to women's past year experiences of physical and sexual IPV, emotional aggression, controlling behaviours and fear of partner. An adjusted cluster-level intention-to-treat analysis compared outcomes in intervention and control communities at follow-up. Results At follow-up, all types of IPV (including severe forms of each) were lower in intervention communities compared with control communities. SASA! was associated with lower onset of abuse and lower continuation of prior abuse. Statistically significant effects were observed for continued physical IPV (adjusted risk ratio 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96); continued sexual IPV (0.68, 0.53 to 0.87); continued emotional aggression (0.68, 0.52 to 0.89); continued fear of partner (0.67, 0.51 to 0.89); and new onset of controlling behaviours (0.38, 0.23 to 0.62). Conclusions Community mobilisation is an effective means for both primary and secondary prevention of IPV. Further support should be given to the replication and scale up of SASA! and other similar interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 825
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a gender transformative intervention on intimate partner violence against women in newly formed neighbourhood groups in Tanzania
    Harvey, Sheila
    Abramsky, Tanya
    Mshana, Gerry
    Hansen, Christian Holm
    Mtolela, Grace J.
    Madaha, Flora
    Hashim, Ramadhan
    Kapinga, Imma
    Watts, Charlotte
    Lees, Shelley
    Kapiga, Saidi
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 6 (07):
  • [22] The effect of a savings intervention on women’s intimate partner violence victimization: heterogeneous findings from a randomized controlled trial in Colombia
    Margaret E. Tankard
    Elizabeth Levy Paluck
    Deborah A. Prentice
    BMC Women's Health, 19
  • [23] The effect of a savings intervention on women's intimate partner violence victimization: heterogeneous findings from a randomized controlled trial in Colombia
    Tankard, Margaret E.
    Paluck, Elizabeth Levy
    Prentice, Deborah A.
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [24] Findings from a community mobilization intervention on intimate partner violence in rural Southwest Nigeria
    Awolaran, Olusegun
    TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2023, 28 : 283 - 284
  • [25] Effectiveness of a multi-level intervention to reduce men’s perpetration of intimate partner violence: a cluster randomised controlled trial
    Nicola J. Christofides
    Abigail M. Hatcher
    Dumisani Rebombo
    Ruari-Santiago McBride
    Shehnaz Munshi
    Angelica Pino
    Nada Abdelatif
    Dean Peacock
    Jonathan Levin
    Rachel K. Jewkes
    Trials, 21
  • [26] Community-Based Intervention for Women Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence: A Randomized Control Trial
    Graham-Bermann, Sandra A.
    Miller-Graff, Laura
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 29 (04) : 537 - 547
  • [27] Women's Participation in Research on Intimate Partner Violence: Findings on Recruitment, Retention, and Participants' Experiences
    Dichter, Melissa E.
    Sorrentino, Anneliese E.
    Haywood, Terri N.
    Tuepker, Anais
    Newell, Summer
    Cusack, Meagan
    True, Gala
    WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2019, 29 (05) : 440 - 446
  • [28] Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence: Findings From Interviews With South Asian Women in the United States
    Ahmad-Stout, Farah
    Nath, Sanjay R.
    Khoury, Nayla M.
    Huang, Hsiang
    JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE, 2021, 36 (3-4) : NP1941 - NP1964
  • [29] Prevalence and risk factors of intimate partner violence among women in four districts of the central region of Ghana: Baseline findings from a cluster randomised controlled trial
    Alangea, Deda Ogum
    Addo-Lartey, Adolphina Addoley
    Sikweyiya, Yandisa
    Chirwa, Esnat Dorothy
    Coker-Appiah, Dorcas
    Jewkes, Rachel
    Adanu, Richard Mawuena Kofi
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07):
  • [30] Randomised pilot and feasibility trial of a group intervention for men who perpetrate intimate partner violence against women
    Cramer, Helen
    Gaunt, Daisy M.
    Shallcross, Rebekah
    Bates, Lis
    Kandiyali, Rebecca
    Sardinha, LynnMarie
    Rice, Caoimhe T.
    Man, Mei-See
    Feder, Gene
    Peters, Tim J.
    Morgan, Karen
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)