Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study

被引:1064
|
作者
Cohen, Alexander T. [1 ]
Tapson, Victor F. [2 ]
Bergmann, Jean-Francois [3 ]
Goldhaber, Samuel Z. [4 ]
Kakkar, Ajay K. [5 ]
Deslandes, Bruno [6 ]
Huang, Wei [7 ]
Zayaruzny, Maksim [7 ]
Emery, Leigh [7 ]
Anderson, Frederick A., Jr. [7 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll Hosp London, London SE5 9RS, England
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[3] Univ Paris 07, Hop Lariboisiere, Paris, France
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[5] Barts & London Queen Marys Sch Med & Dent, Thrombosis Res Inst, London, England
[6] Sanofi Aventis, Paris, France
[7] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Ctr Outcomes Res, Worcester, MA USA
来源
LANCET | 2008年 / 371卷 / 9610期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60202-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background information about the variation in the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and in prophylaxis practices around the world is scarce. The ENDORSE (Epidemiologic International Day for the Evaluation of Patients at Risk for Venous Thromboembolism in the Acute Hospital Care Setting) study is a multinational cross-sectional survey designed to assess the prevalence of VTE risk in the acute hospital care setting, and to determine the proportion of at-risk patients who receive effective prophylaxis. Methods All hospital inpatients aged 40 years or over admitted to a medical ward, or those aged 18 years or over admitted to a surgical ward, in 358 hospitals across 32 countries were assessed for risk of VTE on the basis of hospital chart review. The 2004 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) evidence-based consensus guidelines were used to assess VTE risk and to determine whether patients were receiving recommended prophylaxis. Findings 68183 patients were enrolled; 30 827 (45%) were categorised as surgical, and 37 356 (55%) as medical. On the basis of ACCP criteria, 35 329 (51.8%; 95% CI 51.4-52.2; between-country range 35.6-72.6) patients were judged to be at risk for VTE, including 19 842 (64.4%; 63.8-64.9; 44.1-80.2) surgical patients and 15 487 (41. 5%; 41.0-42. 0; 21.1-71.2) medical patients. Of the surgical patients at risk, 11613 (58.5%; 57.8-59.2; 0.2-92.1) received ACCP-recommended VTE prophylaxis, compared with 6119 (39.5%; 38.7-40.3; 3.1-70.4) at-risk medical patients. Interpretation A large proportion of hospitalised patients are at risk for VTE, but there is a low rate of appropriate prophylaxis. Our data reinforce the rationale for the use of hospital-wide strategies to assess patients' VTE risk and to implement measures that ensure that at-risk patients receive appropriate prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 394
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The first ambulatory screening on thromboembolism: a multicentre, cross-sectional, observational study on risk factors for venous thromboembolism
    Di Minno, G
    Mannucci, PM
    Tufano, A
    Palareti, G
    Moia, M
    Baccaglini, U
    Rudelli, G
    Giudici, GA
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2005, 3 (07) : 1459 - 1466
  • [32] Restraint use in the acute-care hospital setting: A cross-sectional multi-centre study
    Thomann, Silvia
    Zwakhalen, Sandra
    Richter, Dirk
    Bauer, Silvia
    Hahn, Sabine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2021, 114
  • [33] Incontinence-associated dermatitis: a cross-sectional prevalence study in the Australian acute care hospital setting
    Campbell, Jill L.
    Coyer, Fiona M.
    Osborne, Sonya R.
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2016, 13 (03) : 403 - 411
  • [34] Chlamydia pneumoniae IgG serological status and venous thromboembolism -: A cross-sectional hospital based study
    Saint Martin, LD
    Pasquier, E
    Betsou, F
    Tran, A
    Couturaud, F
    Orfila, J
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 2004, 33 (21): : 1493 - 1496
  • [35] Cross-sectional study of adherence to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines in hospitalized patients. The Trombo-Brit study
    Bottaro F.J.
    Ceresetto J.M.
    Emery J.
    Bruetman J.
    Emery N.
    Pellegrini D.
    Pinoni V.
    Piñeiro G.
    Fox L.
    Orrico M.E.
    Palmer S.
    Prieto S.
    Bullorsky E.
    Thrombosis Journal, 10 (1)
  • [36] Risk profiles and prophylaxis history of patients developing venous thromboembolism in the outpatient setting: The Worcester venous thromboembolism study
    Spencer, FA
    Emery, C
    Lessard, D
    Anderson, FA
    Emani, S
    Becker, FC
    Goldberg, RJ
    CHEST, 2005, 128 (04) : 192S - 192S
  • [37] TREND, PREVALENCE, AND OUTCOMES OF ACUTE VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM AMONGST US HOSPITALIZATIONS - A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
    Bag, Soumyadeep
    Patra, Tumpa
    Kelangi, Sarah Susan
    Kpadenou, Vihoale
    Regassa, Henok Dereje
    Jerry, Merilyn
    Sindu, Devika
    Erva, Snigdha
    Hsieh, Ya-Ching
    Puli, Srikanth
    Panghal, Ritvika
    Gujarathi, Rahul
    Patel, Urvish
    Thakkar, Badal Girishbhai
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 2078 - 2078
  • [38] Continuation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after hospital discharge into the outpatient setting: the ACCEPT study
    Schellong, Sebastian M.
    Kaiser, Juergen
    Bramlage, Peter
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2015, 39 (02) : 173 - 178
  • [39] Continuation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after hospital discharge into the outpatient setting: the ACCEPT study
    Sebastian M. Schellong
    Jürgen Kaiser
    Peter Bramlage
    Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2015, 39 : 173 - 178
  • [40] Risk assessment of maternal venous thromboembolism in antenatal and postnatal period; a cross-sectional, descriptive study
    Hassan, Hadbaa
    Mohmmed, Salam Jasim
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2022, 26 (04) : 530 - 534