Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study

被引:1064
|
作者
Cohen, Alexander T. [1 ]
Tapson, Victor F. [2 ]
Bergmann, Jean-Francois [3 ]
Goldhaber, Samuel Z. [4 ]
Kakkar, Ajay K. [5 ]
Deslandes, Bruno [6 ]
Huang, Wei [7 ]
Zayaruzny, Maksim [7 ]
Emery, Leigh [7 ]
Anderson, Frederick A., Jr. [7 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll Hosp London, London SE5 9RS, England
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[3] Univ Paris 07, Hop Lariboisiere, Paris, France
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[5] Barts & London Queen Marys Sch Med & Dent, Thrombosis Res Inst, London, England
[6] Sanofi Aventis, Paris, France
[7] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Ctr Outcomes Res, Worcester, MA USA
来源
LANCET | 2008年 / 371卷 / 9610期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60202-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background information about the variation in the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and in prophylaxis practices around the world is scarce. The ENDORSE (Epidemiologic International Day for the Evaluation of Patients at Risk for Venous Thromboembolism in the Acute Hospital Care Setting) study is a multinational cross-sectional survey designed to assess the prevalence of VTE risk in the acute hospital care setting, and to determine the proportion of at-risk patients who receive effective prophylaxis. Methods All hospital inpatients aged 40 years or over admitted to a medical ward, or those aged 18 years or over admitted to a surgical ward, in 358 hospitals across 32 countries were assessed for risk of VTE on the basis of hospital chart review. The 2004 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) evidence-based consensus guidelines were used to assess VTE risk and to determine whether patients were receiving recommended prophylaxis. Findings 68183 patients were enrolled; 30 827 (45%) were categorised as surgical, and 37 356 (55%) as medical. On the basis of ACCP criteria, 35 329 (51.8%; 95% CI 51.4-52.2; between-country range 35.6-72.6) patients were judged to be at risk for VTE, including 19 842 (64.4%; 63.8-64.9; 44.1-80.2) surgical patients and 15 487 (41. 5%; 41.0-42. 0; 21.1-71.2) medical patients. Of the surgical patients at risk, 11613 (58.5%; 57.8-59.2; 0.2-92.1) received ACCP-recommended VTE prophylaxis, compared with 6119 (39.5%; 38.7-40.3; 3.1-70.4) at-risk medical patients. Interpretation A large proportion of hospitalised patients are at risk for VTE, but there is a low rate of appropriate prophylaxis. Our data reinforce the rationale for the use of hospital-wide strategies to assess patients' VTE risk and to implement measures that ensure that at-risk patients receive appropriate prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 394
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Venous thromboembolism risk in psychiatric in-patients: a multicentre cross-sectional study
    Ellis, Natalie
    Grubb, Carla-Marie
    Mustoe, Sophie
    Watkins, Eleanor
    Codling, David
    Fitch, Sarah
    Stirland, Lucy
    Quraishy, Munzir
    Jenkinson, Josie
    Harrison, Judith
    BJPSYCH BULLETIN, 2019, 43 (06): : 255 - 259
  • [22] A cross-sectional, multicenter, observational study to assess the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in Lebanese and Jordanian hospitals
    Hajj, Imad
    AL-Masri, Mahmoud
    Bashaireh, Kaldoun
    Hani, Mohammed Bani
    Hamouri, Shadi
    Khouzami, Joe
    Sabra, Nisrine
    Fadel, Chahine
    THROMBOSIS JOURNAL, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [23] A cross-sectional, multicenter, observational study to assess the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in Lebanese and Jordanian hospitals
    Imad Hajj
    Mahmoud AL-Masri
    Kaldoun Bashaireh
    Mohammed Bani Hani
    Shadi Hamouri
    Joe Khouzami
    Nisrine Sabra
    Chahine Fadel
    Thrombosis Journal, 19
  • [24] The Length of Hospital Stay of Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan
    Amawi, Haneen
    Arabyat, Rasha M. M.
    Al-Azzam, Sayer
    AlZu'bi, Toqa
    U'wais, Hamza Tayseer
    Hammad, Alaa M. M.
    Amawi, Ruba
    Nusair, Mohammad B. B.
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (04):
  • [25] Prevalence and factors associated with the absence of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: A cross-sectional study of Georgia intensive care units
    Hawkins, Anthony
    Mazzeffi, Michael
    Abraham, Prasad
    Paciullo, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 36 : 49 - 53
  • [26] Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in hospitalized obstetric patients in Ireland: a multicentre cross-sectional study
    Crowley, M. P.
    Noone, C.
    Higgins, J. R.
    O' Shea, S.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2013, 11 : 739 - 739
  • [27] Assessment of Venous Thromboembolism Risk and Adequacy of Prophylaxis in Selected Acute Care Medical Centres in Arabian Gulf States: Results from the ENDORSE Study
    Alsayegh, Faisal
    Kamaliddin, Hassan
    Sheshah, Eman
    Bukhamseen, Nasir
    Alkhuwaitir, Tarig
    Elhoufi, Ashraf
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2012, 21 (06) : 522 - 528
  • [28] Venous thromboembolism risk and antithrombotic prophylaxis among patients admitted to Spanish hospitals (ENDORSE study)
    Nieto Rodriguez, Jose Antonio
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2009, 133 (01): : 1 - 7
  • [29] Venous Thromboembolism Rates in Transferred Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Samuel Lai
    Eric Ton
    Marianne Lovejoy
    William Graham
    Alpesh Amin
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2018, 33 : 42 - 49
  • [30] Venous Thromboembolism Rates in Transferred Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Lai, Samuel
    Ton, Eric
    Lovejoy, Marianne
    Graham, William
    Amin, Alpesh
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 (01) : 42 - 49