In vitro susceptibility of 124 Xanthomonas maltophilia (Stenotrophomonas maltophilia) isolates - Comparison of the agar dilution method with the E-test and two agar diffusion methods

被引:21
|
作者
Arpi, M
Victor, MA
Mortensen, I
Gottschau, A
Bruun, B
机构
[1] STATENS SERUM INST, DEPT HOSP INFECT & ANTIBIOT, DK-2300 COPENHAGEN, DENMARK
[2] STATENS SERUM INST, DEPT CLIN MICROBIOL, DK-2300 COPENHAGEN, DENMARK
[3] STATENS SERUM INST, DEPT BIOSTAT, DK-2300 COPENHAGEN, DENMARK
关键词
susceptibility; Xanthomonas (Stenotrophomonas) maltophilia; different susceptibility methods;
D O I
10.1111/j.1699-0463.1996.tb00695.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The in vitro susceptibility of 124 Xanthomonas maltophilia isolates was tested by four methods: Agar dilution (reference method), E-test, a disk diffusion and a tablet diffusion method. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole had the highest activity against X. maltophilia, followed by a combination of aztreonam-clavulanic acid at different ratios, the ratio 1:1 being the most active with a susceptibility rate of 85% as compared to 2% for aztreonam alone. Addition of the beta-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam to piperacillin enhanced the rate of susceptible isolates from 31% to 53%. Relatively few isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin (27%) and gentamicin (9%). Generally, the disk diffusion method had a considerably higher frequency of ''very major'' discrepancies when compared with the agar dilution method than with the other methods. The susceptibility of X. maltophilia to trimethoprim-sulfame-thoxazole and ciprofloxacin could reliably be determined by all the diffusion methods tested, but otherwise the agar dilution method is to be preferred. A standardized and reliable diffusion method for susceptibility testing of X. maltophilia remains to be found. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole must be considered the drug of choice in the treatment of severe X. maltophilia infections. The combination aztreonam-clavulanic acid is promising, but must be proved in a clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 114
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative in vitro activity of gatifloxacin against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Burkholderia species isolates including evaluation of disk diffusion and E test methods
    Biedenbach, DJ
    Croco, MAT
    Barrett, TJ
    Jones, RN
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1999, 18 (06) : 428 - 431
  • [42] Comparison of-agar dilution, microdilution, E-test, and disk diffusion methods for testing activity of cefditoren against Streptococcus pneumoniae
    Kelly, LM
    Jacobs, MR
    Appelbaum, PC
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 37 (10) : 3296 - 3299
  • [43] Comparison between disk diffusion and agar dilution methods to determine in vitro susceptibility of Corynebacterium spp. clinical isolates and update of their susceptibility
    Barberis, Claudia M.
    Sandoval, Eugenia
    Hernan Rodriguez, Carlos
    Ramirez, Maria Soledad
    Famiglietti, Angela
    Almuzara, Marisa
    Vay, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2018, 14 : 246 - 252
  • [44] Comparison of agar dilution, broth dilution, disk diffusion, and the E-test for susceptibility testing of penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae
    Thorvilson, J
    Kohner, P
    Henry, N
    Cockerill, F
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 16 (05) : 391 - 394
  • [45] Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter spp. by the agar dilution and the agar disk diffusion methods
    Luangtongkum, Taradon
    Morishita, Teresa Y.
    El-Tayeb, Amna B.
    Ison, Aaron J.
    Zhang, Qijing
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 45 (02) : 590 - 594
  • [46] Comparative evaluation of E-test and Agar dilution method for susceptibility testing to detect levofloxacin-resistant Helicobacter pylori isolates with gyrA mutations
    Miyachi, Hideyuki
    Shirasaka, Daisuke
    Aoyama, Nobuo
    Miki, Ikuya
    Matsumoto, Yuko
    Tanaka, Toshio
    Morita, Yoshinori
    Tamura, Takao
    Kutsumi, Hiromu
    Inokuchi, Hideto
    Azuma, Takeshi
    Kasuga, Masato
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 132 (04) : A612 - A612
  • [47] Comparison of Etest and agar dilution method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Flavobacterium isolates
    Hsueh, PR
    Chang, JC
    Teng, LJ
    Yang, PC
    Ho, SW
    Hsieh, WC
    Luh, KT
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 35 (04) : 1021 - 1023
  • [48] Comparison of the E test to the reference agar dilution method for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Clostridium difficile
    Poilane, I
    Cruaud, P
    Torlotin, JC
    Collignon, A
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2000, 6 (03) : 154 - 156
  • [49] Comparison of metronidazole susceptibility testing by agar dilution, disk diffusion and epsilometer test in Helicobacter pylori (Hp) isolates
    Perna, F
    Gatta, L
    Figura, N
    Holton, J
    Osborn, J
    Ricci, C
    Tampieri, A
    Miglioli, M
    Vaira, D
    GUT, 2002, 51 : A7 - A7
  • [50] Testing of In Vitro Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to Azithromycin: Comparison of Disk Diffusion and Reference Agar Dilution Methods
    Gianecini, Ricardo
    Irazu, Lucia
    Rodriguez, Marcelo
    Cristaldo, Paula
    Oviedo, Claudia
    Turco, Marisa
    Rodrigo, Veronica
    Canigia, Liliana Fernandez
    Schneider, Ana
    Guelfand, Liliana
    Scocozza, Laura
    Galarza, Patricia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (11)