In vitro susceptibility of 124 Xanthomonas maltophilia (Stenotrophomonas maltophilia) isolates - Comparison of the agar dilution method with the E-test and two agar diffusion methods

被引:21
|
作者
Arpi, M
Victor, MA
Mortensen, I
Gottschau, A
Bruun, B
机构
[1] STATENS SERUM INST, DEPT HOSP INFECT & ANTIBIOT, DK-2300 COPENHAGEN, DENMARK
[2] STATENS SERUM INST, DEPT CLIN MICROBIOL, DK-2300 COPENHAGEN, DENMARK
[3] STATENS SERUM INST, DEPT BIOSTAT, DK-2300 COPENHAGEN, DENMARK
关键词
susceptibility; Xanthomonas (Stenotrophomonas) maltophilia; different susceptibility methods;
D O I
10.1111/j.1699-0463.1996.tb00695.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The in vitro susceptibility of 124 Xanthomonas maltophilia isolates was tested by four methods: Agar dilution (reference method), E-test, a disk diffusion and a tablet diffusion method. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole had the highest activity against X. maltophilia, followed by a combination of aztreonam-clavulanic acid at different ratios, the ratio 1:1 being the most active with a susceptibility rate of 85% as compared to 2% for aztreonam alone. Addition of the beta-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam to piperacillin enhanced the rate of susceptible isolates from 31% to 53%. Relatively few isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin (27%) and gentamicin (9%). Generally, the disk diffusion method had a considerably higher frequency of ''very major'' discrepancies when compared with the agar dilution method than with the other methods. The susceptibility of X. maltophilia to trimethoprim-sulfame-thoxazole and ciprofloxacin could reliably be determined by all the diffusion methods tested, but otherwise the agar dilution method is to be preferred. A standardized and reliable diffusion method for susceptibility testing of X. maltophilia remains to be found. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole must be considered the drug of choice in the treatment of severe X. maltophilia infections. The combination aztreonam-clavulanic acid is promising, but must be proved in a clinical setting.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 114
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of the E test and agar dilution methods for susceptibility testing of Arcanobacterium haemolyticum
    Carlson, P
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 19 (11) : 891 - 893
  • [32] Comparison of disc diffusion & E test methods with agar dilution for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae
    Manoharan, A
    Pai, R
    Shankar, V
    Thomas, K
    Lalitha, MK
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2003, 117 : 81 - 87
  • [33] Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori isolates from Brazilian children and adolescents: Comparing agar dilution, E-test, and disk diffusion
    Ogata, Silvio Kazuo
    Gales, Ana Cristina
    Kawakami, Elisabete
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 45 (04) : 1439 - 1448
  • [34] Comparison of agar dilution, broth dilution, disk diffusion, and the E-test for susceptibility testing of penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistantStreptococcus pneumoniae
    J. Thorvilson
    P. Kohner
    N. Henry
    F. Cockerill
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 1997, 16 : 391 - 394
  • [35] Comparison of agar dilution vs. E-test® in the interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility to H-pylori.
    Weissfeld, A
    Kidd, S
    Fludas, C
    Greski-Rose, P
    Siepman, N
    Hunt, B
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 114 (04) : A329 - A329
  • [36] Antimicrobial susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates determined by the agar dilution, disk diffusion and Etest methods: comparison of results using GC agar and chocolate agar
    Liao, Chun-Hsing
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    Hsu, Meng-Shuian
    Chu, Fang-Yeh
    Wu, Mei-Yu
    Huang, Yu-Tsung
    Hsueh, Po-Ren
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2010, 35 (05) : 457 - 460
  • [37] TESTING METRONIDAZOLE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI STRAINS BY THE AGAR DILUTION REFERENCE METHOD AND EPSILOMETER TEST (E-TEST)
    Martinez-Gonzalez, B.
    Georgopoulos, S.
    Xirouchakis, E.
    Sgouras, D. N.
    Mentis, A. F.
    HELICOBACTER, 2015, 20 : 103 - 103
  • [38] In vitro susceptibility of Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates: Comparison of disk diffusion, Etest®, agar dilution, and broth microdilution methods
    Correa Fehlberg, Lorena Cristina
    Nicoletti, Adriana Gianinni
    Ramos, Ana Carolina
    Rodrigues-Costa, Fernanda
    de Matos, Adriana Pereira
    Girardello, Raquel
    Marques, Elizabeth Andrade
    Gales, Ana Cristina
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2016, 86 (04) : 422 - 427
  • [39] Comparison of Agar Dilution and E-test for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter coli isolates recovered form 80 Ontario swine farms
    Varela, Norma P.
    Friendship, Robert
    Dewey, Cate
    Valdivieso, Alfonso
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE VETERINAIRE, 2008, 72 (02): : 168 - 174
  • [40] Comparative In Vitro Activity of Gatifloxacin Against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Burkholderia Species Isolates Including Evaluation of Disk Diffusion and E Test Methods
    D. J. Biedenbach
    M. A. T. Croco
    T. J. Barrett
    R. N. Jones
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 1999, 18 : 428 - 431