Ischemic Stroke Survivors' Opinion Regarding Research Utilizing Exception from Informed Consent

被引:8
|
作者
Kleindorfer, Dawn [1 ]
Lindsell, Christopher J. [1 ]
Alwell, Kathleen [1 ]
Woo, Daniel [1 ]
Flaherty, Matthew L. [1 ]
Eilerman, Jane [1 ]
Khatri, Pooja [1 ]
Adeoye, Opeolu [1 ]
Ferioli, Simona [1 ]
Kissela, Brett M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
关键词
Acute stroke; Angiography; Brain imaging; Stroke care; Transient ischemic attack; COMMUNITY CONSULTATION; EMERGENCY RESEARCH; TRIALS; REQUIREMENTS; ATTITUDES; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1159/000328815
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: 'Exception from informed consent for research' (EFIC) is a rigorous procedure regulated by the FDA that requires community assent but allows enrollment without patient or family consent. Recently, several acute stroke trials have explored the use of EFIC to improve enrollment. We obtained ischemic stroke survivors' opinions regarding hypothetical enrollment into a clinical trial at the time of their stroke without personal or proxy consent. Methods: During 2005, 460 ischemic stroke patients (or their proxy) who met case criteria were prospectively interviewed and followed. After 2 years, patients were asked to think back to the time of their stroke and indicate whether they would have wished to be enrolled in an acute stroke research study before individual or proxy consent could be obtained, understanding that consent would be sought as soon as possible thereafter, and they rated how agreeable they would have been to acute stroke research with different levels of invasiveness. Predictors of a positive opinion regarding the hypothetical research were analyzed using logistic regression. Variables included in the model were age, race, sex, education, initial NIHSS, modified Rankin Scale prior to stroke and 30 days after stroke, and proxy versus patient responder. Results: At 2 years after stroke, after excluding patient deaths, missing data or refusals, there were 194 patient/proxy responses included in this analysis. Overall, 72-79% of responses were favorable for chart review or blood draw without consent. The proportions answering agreeably to questions about medications or invasive strategies were smaller (62.9 and 59.8%). Older subjects were less likely to offer an agreeable response regarding use of medications [OR 0.97 per year (95% CI 0.94-0.99)] and invasive procedures [OR 0.97 per year (95% CI 0.94-0.99)]. Nonblacks tended to be more agreeable than blacks to invasive procedures. Men had twice the odds of being agreeable to blood draws than women. Conclusions: We found that the majority of interviewed ischemic stroke patients were agreeable to being enrolled in acute stroke research with exception from informed consent, although the rates of agreement were lower than we expected among a cohort of patients who had already agreed to research. Older subjects, black race, and women were less likely to agree to blood draws or treatment strategies. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 326
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Informed consent for thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke
    Sivakumar, C
    Palumbo, V
    Hill, MD
    Buchan, AM
    STROKE, 2005, 36 (03) : 528 - 529
  • [32] An ethical analysis of exception from informed consent regulations
    Morris, MC
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 12 (11) : 1113 - 1119
  • [33] Informed consent in acute ischemic stroke: It's on us
    Majersik, Jennifer J.
    Morgenstern, Lewis B.
    NEUROLOGY, 2018, 90 (05) : 203 - 204
  • [34] The Development of Exception from Informed Consent and Waiver of Informed Consent Guidelines for Emergency Medicine Researchers
    Elkin, K., Jr.
    Paxton, J.
    Belsky, J.
    Brown, K.
    Mitchell, A. M.
    Musey, P. I., Jr.
    Tolles, J.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 74 (04) : S63 - S63
  • [35] OPINION The ethics of informed consent in Alzheimer disease research
    Kim, Scott Y. H.
    NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY, 2011, 7 (07) : 410 - 414
  • [36] Exception From Informed Consent (EFIC) In Emergency Research: Developing A Community Consultation Plan
    Zarrieneh, Ashkan
    Amidei, Christina
    Jahromi, Babak
    STROKE, 2023, 54
  • [37] EMS PROVIDERS AND EXCEPTION FROM INFORMED CONSENT RESEARCH: BENEFITS, ETHICS, AND COMMUNITY CONSULTATION
    Ripley, Elizabeth
    Ramsey, Cornelia
    Prorock-Ernest, Amy
    Foco, Rebecca
    Luckett, Solomon, Jr.
    Ornato, Joseph P.
    PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2012, 16 (04) : 425 - 433
  • [38] Patients' Perspectives on Enrollment in Research Using the Exception From Informed Consent: An Integrated Survey
    Dickert, Neal W.
    Biros, Michelle H.
    Harney, Deneil K.
    Jones, Elizabeth B.
    Mitchell, Andrea R.
    Scicluna, Victoria M.
    Silbergleit, Robert
    Speight, Candace D.
    Wright, David W.
    Pentz, Rebecca D.
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 138
  • [39] Randomizing Patients without Consent: Waiver vs Exception from Informed Consent
    Cole, Jon B.
    Ho, Jeffrey D.
    Biros, Michelle H.
    PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (04) : 457 - 457
  • [40] Informed consent content in research with survivors of psychological trauma
    Abu-Rus, Ana
    Bussell, Noah
    Olsen, Donald C.
    Ardill, Marie
    Davis-Ku, Alissa L.
    Arzoumanian, Meline A.
    ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2019, 29 (08) : 595 - 606