Ischemic Stroke Survivors' Opinion Regarding Research Utilizing Exception from Informed Consent

被引:8
|
作者
Kleindorfer, Dawn [1 ]
Lindsell, Christopher J. [1 ]
Alwell, Kathleen [1 ]
Woo, Daniel [1 ]
Flaherty, Matthew L. [1 ]
Eilerman, Jane [1 ]
Khatri, Pooja [1 ]
Adeoye, Opeolu [1 ]
Ferioli, Simona [1 ]
Kissela, Brett M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
关键词
Acute stroke; Angiography; Brain imaging; Stroke care; Transient ischemic attack; COMMUNITY CONSULTATION; EMERGENCY RESEARCH; TRIALS; REQUIREMENTS; ATTITUDES; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1159/000328815
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: 'Exception from informed consent for research' (EFIC) is a rigorous procedure regulated by the FDA that requires community assent but allows enrollment without patient or family consent. Recently, several acute stroke trials have explored the use of EFIC to improve enrollment. We obtained ischemic stroke survivors' opinions regarding hypothetical enrollment into a clinical trial at the time of their stroke without personal or proxy consent. Methods: During 2005, 460 ischemic stroke patients (or their proxy) who met case criteria were prospectively interviewed and followed. After 2 years, patients were asked to think back to the time of their stroke and indicate whether they would have wished to be enrolled in an acute stroke research study before individual or proxy consent could be obtained, understanding that consent would be sought as soon as possible thereafter, and they rated how agreeable they would have been to acute stroke research with different levels of invasiveness. Predictors of a positive opinion regarding the hypothetical research were analyzed using logistic regression. Variables included in the model were age, race, sex, education, initial NIHSS, modified Rankin Scale prior to stroke and 30 days after stroke, and proxy versus patient responder. Results: At 2 years after stroke, after excluding patient deaths, missing data or refusals, there were 194 patient/proxy responses included in this analysis. Overall, 72-79% of responses were favorable for chart review or blood draw without consent. The proportions answering agreeably to questions about medications or invasive strategies were smaller (62.9 and 59.8%). Older subjects were less likely to offer an agreeable response regarding use of medications [OR 0.97 per year (95% CI 0.94-0.99)] and invasive procedures [OR 0.97 per year (95% CI 0.94-0.99)]. Nonblacks tended to be more agreeable than blacks to invasive procedures. Men had twice the odds of being agreeable to blood draws than women. Conclusions: We found that the majority of interviewed ischemic stroke patients were agreeable to being enrolled in acute stroke research with exception from informed consent, although the rates of agreement were lower than we expected among a cohort of patients who had already agreed to research. Older subjects, black race, and women were less likely to agree to blood draws or treatment strategies. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 326
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prehospital trials: Exception from informed consent
    Moore, Ernest
    INFLAMMATION RESEARCH, 2007, 56 : S241 - S241
  • [22] Exception From Informed Consent: Ethics and Logistics
    Goldstein, Joshua N.
    Fu, Rongwei
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (03) : 365 - 366
  • [23] Exception from informed consent in the era of social media: The SEGA stroke trial experience
    Inam, Mehmet Enes
    Sanzgiri, Aditya
    Lekka, Elvira
    Sheth, Sunil A.
    Barreto, Andrew D.
    Savitz, Sean, I
    Artime, Carlos
    Pedroza, Claudia
    Engstrom, Allison
    Sheriff, Faheem G.
    Ambrocik, Alexander
    Chen, Peng Roc
    BRAIN CIRCULATION, 2021, 7 (04) : 253 - +
  • [24] Exception from informed consent for emergency research: Consulting the trauma community DISCUSSION
    Minei, Joseph P.
    Cooper, Arthur
    Sims, Carrie
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2013, 74 (01): : 165 - 166
  • [25] Exception from informed consent enrollment in emergency medical research: Attitudes and awareness
    Triner, Wayne
    Jacoby, Liva
    Shelton, Wayne
    Burk, Mathew
    Imarenakhue, Samual
    Watt, James
    Larkin, Gregory
    Mcgee, Glenn
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 14 (02) : 187 - 191
  • [26] Emergency Research: Using Exception from Informed Consent, Evaluation of Community Consultations
    Govindarajan, Prasanthi
    Dickert, Neal W.
    Meeker, Michele
    De Souza, Natalie
    Harney, Deneil
    Hemphill, Claude J.
    Pentz, Rebecca
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 20 (01) : 98 - 103
  • [27] Exception from informed consent for biomedical research in emergency settings: A study from Jordan
    Al-Shatnawi, Samah F.
    Alzoubi, Karem H.
    Khasawneh, Rawand A.
    Khabour, Omar F.
    Almomani, Basima A.
    HELIYON, 2021, 7 (12)
  • [28] Does the emergency exception from informed consent process protect research subjects?
    Delorio, NM
    McClure, KB
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 12 (11) : 1056 - 1059
  • [29] Current status of research on the federal guidelines for performing research using an exception from informed consent
    Schmidt, TA
    Lewis, RJ
    Richardson, LD
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 12 (11) : 1022 - 1026
  • [30] Acute Agitation and the Exception From Informed Consent Requirements
    Wheeler, Abigail R.
    Schauer, Steven G.
    April, Michael D.
    De Lorenzo, Robert A.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 73 (06) : 691 - 692