Peanut oral immunotherapy in a pediatric allergy clinic: Patient factors associated with clinical outcomes

被引:5
|
作者
Guarnieri, Katharine M. [1 ,2 ]
Slack, Ian F. [1 ,2 ]
Gadoury-Levesque, Vanessa [3 ]
Eapen, Amy A. [4 ]
Andorf, Sandra [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Lierl, Michelle B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Allergy & Immunol, MLC 7028,3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] McGill Univ, Montreal Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Div Allergy & Clin Immunol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Div Allergy & Clin Immunol, Dept Med, Detroit, MI USA
[5] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Biomed Informat, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
关键词
DOUBLE-BLIND; EFFICACY; CHILDREN; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.anai.2021.04.003
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Additional information is needed to inform optimal patient selection, expected outcomes, and treatment end points for clinical peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT). Objective: To provide insight into the optimal patient selection, expected outcomes, and treatment end points for clinical peanut oral immunotherapy by analyzing a real-world peanut OIT cohort. Methods: Records were reviewed for 174 children undergoing peanut OIT at a pediatric allergy clinic. Patient age, peanut skin prick test results, and peanut-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) results, with inclusion of additional foods in OIT, were analyzed for correlations with OIT outcomes. Results: To date, 144 patients have achieved maintenance dosing, 50 of whom transitioned to ad lib twice weekly peanut ingestion. A total of 30 discontinued OIT. In addition, 47 patients who underwent multifood OIT had no significant difference in reactions (FDR-adjusted P = .48) or time-to-reach maintenance (FDR-adjusted P = .48) compared with those on peanut OIT alone. Age at initiation inversely correlated with achievement of maintenance: 92% of patients 0.5 to less than 5 years, 81% of those 5 to less than 11 years, and 70% of those 11 to less than 18 years reached and continued maintenance (P = .01). Baseline peanut-sIgE level positively correlated with number of reactions during updosing (P < .001) and maintenance (P = .005), though it was not significantly different in patients achieving successful maintenance vs those who discontinued OIT (P = .09). Furthermore, 66% of patients experienced greater than or equal to 1 adverse reaction during OIT. Of those on ad lib peanut ingestion, 2 reported mild reactions after lapses in peanut consumption. Conclusion: Clinical peanut OIT has similar outcomes to research protocols. OIT can be successful in older children and those with high peanut-sIgE levels, though these factors affect outcomes. Clinical and laboratory criteria can guide successful transition to intermittent ad lib peanut consumption. (c) 2021 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:214 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pediatric Oral Food Challenge Outcomes by Food Type in a Large Pediatric Allergy Clinic
    Gupta, Shikha
    Robinson, Melissa L.
    Lanser, Bruce J.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2019, 143 (02) : AB168 - AB168
  • [42] Probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy: a breakthrough for allergy treatment
    Greenhawt, Matthew J.
    LANCET CHILD & ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2017, 1 (02): : 80 - 81
  • [43] AR101 Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy
    Vickery, Brian P.
    Vereda, Andrea
    Casale, Thomas B.
    Beyer, Kirsten
    du Toit, George
    Hourihane, Jonathan O.
    Jones, Stacie M.
    Shreffler, Wayne G.
    Marcantonio, Annette
    Zawadzki, Rezi
    Sher, Lawrence
    Carr, Warner W.
    Fineman, Stanley
    Greos, Leon
    Rachid, Rima
    Ibanez, M. Dolores
    Tilles, Stephen
    Assa'ad, Amal H.
    Nilsson, Caroline
    Rupp, Ned
    Welch, Michael J.
    Sussman, Gordon
    Chinthrajah, Sharon
    Blumchen, Katharina
    Sher, Ellen
    Spergel, Jonathan M.
    Leickly, Frederick E.
    Zielen, Stefan
    Wang, Julie
    Sanders, Georgiana M.
    Wood, Robert A.
    Cheema, Amarjit
    Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten
    Leonard, Stephanie
    Kachru, Rita
    Johnston, Douglas T.
    Hampel, Frank C., Jr.
    Kim, Edwin H.
    Anagnostou, Aikaterini
    Pongracic, Jacqueline A.
    Ben-Shoshan, Moshe
    Sharma, Hemant P.
    Stillerman, Allan
    Windom, Hugh H.
    Yang, William H.
    Muraro, Antonella
    Zubeldia, Jose M.
    Sharma, Vibha
    Dorsey, Morna J.
    Chong, Hey J.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 379 (21): : 1991 - 2001
  • [44] Oral and subcutaneous immunotherapy in a peanut allergy mouse model
    Wagenaar, L.
    Vonk, M. M.
    van Roest, M.
    Kruijssen, L. J. W.
    Knippels, L. M. J.
    van Esch, B. C. A. M.
    Pieters, R. H. H.
    Smit, J. J.
    ALLERGY, 2015, 70 : 200 - 200
  • [45] STOPping peanut allergy: the saga of food oral immunotherapy
    Greenhawt, Matthew J.
    LANCET, 2014, 383 (9925): : 1272 - 1274
  • [46] Peanut Allergy: first oral Immunotherapy is approved in Germany
    Ayazpoor, Ute
    ALLERGO JOURNAL, 2022, 31 (02) : 72 - 72
  • [47] The Clinical Utility of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy
    Samstein, Miriam
    Ponda, Punita
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2019, 7 (07): : 2503 - 2504
  • [48] Peanut Allergy: Preparation for oral Immunotherapy now approved
    Wepner, Ulrike
    ALLERGO JOURNAL, 2021, 30 (01) : 67 - 67
  • [49] Oral Immunotherapy for Management of Peanut Allergy in Spanish Children
    Vila, L.
    Amado, A.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 26 (03) : 207 - 209
  • [50] Oral Immunotherapy in Japanese Children with Anaphylactic Peanut Allergy
    Nagakura, Ken-ichi
    Sato, Sakura
    Yanagida, Noriyuki
    Nishino, Makoto
    Asaumi, Tomoyuki
    Ogura, Kiyotake
    Ebisawa, Motohiro
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 175 (03) : 181 - 188