Peanut oral immunotherapy in a pediatric allergy clinic: Patient factors associated with clinical outcomes

被引:5
|
作者
Guarnieri, Katharine M. [1 ,2 ]
Slack, Ian F. [1 ,2 ]
Gadoury-Levesque, Vanessa [3 ]
Eapen, Amy A. [4 ]
Andorf, Sandra [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Lierl, Michelle B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Allergy & Immunol, MLC 7028,3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] McGill Univ, Montreal Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Div Allergy & Clin Immunol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, Div Allergy & Clin Immunol, Dept Med, Detroit, MI USA
[5] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Biomed Informat, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
关键词
DOUBLE-BLIND; EFFICACY; CHILDREN; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.anai.2021.04.003
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Additional information is needed to inform optimal patient selection, expected outcomes, and treatment end points for clinical peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT). Objective: To provide insight into the optimal patient selection, expected outcomes, and treatment end points for clinical peanut oral immunotherapy by analyzing a real-world peanut OIT cohort. Methods: Records were reviewed for 174 children undergoing peanut OIT at a pediatric allergy clinic. Patient age, peanut skin prick test results, and peanut-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) results, with inclusion of additional foods in OIT, were analyzed for correlations with OIT outcomes. Results: To date, 144 patients have achieved maintenance dosing, 50 of whom transitioned to ad lib twice weekly peanut ingestion. A total of 30 discontinued OIT. In addition, 47 patients who underwent multifood OIT had no significant difference in reactions (FDR-adjusted P = .48) or time-to-reach maintenance (FDR-adjusted P = .48) compared with those on peanut OIT alone. Age at initiation inversely correlated with achievement of maintenance: 92% of patients 0.5 to less than 5 years, 81% of those 5 to less than 11 years, and 70% of those 11 to less than 18 years reached and continued maintenance (P = .01). Baseline peanut-sIgE level positively correlated with number of reactions during updosing (P < .001) and maintenance (P = .005), though it was not significantly different in patients achieving successful maintenance vs those who discontinued OIT (P = .09). Furthermore, 66% of patients experienced greater than or equal to 1 adverse reaction during OIT. Of those on ad lib peanut ingestion, 2 reported mild reactions after lapses in peanut consumption. Conclusion: Clinical peanut OIT has similar outcomes to research protocols. OIT can be successful in older children and those with high peanut-sIgE levels, though these factors affect outcomes. Clinical and laboratory criteria can guide successful transition to intermittent ad lib peanut consumption. (c) 2021 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:214 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy: The con argument
    Fiocchi, Alessandro
    Artesani, Maria Cristina
    Fierro, Vincenzo
    Riccardi, Carla
    Dahdah, Lamia
    Mennini, Maurizio
    WORLD ALLERGY ORGANIZATION JOURNAL, 2020, 13 (08):
  • [32] Guideline recommends oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy
    不详
    ALLERGO JOURNAL, 2021, 30 (07) : 55 - 55
  • [33] Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy: The pro argument
    Chinthrajah, R. Sharon
    Cao, Shu
    Dunham, Theresa
    Sampath, Vanitha
    Chandra, Sharad
    Chen, Meng
    Sindher, Sayantani
    Nadeau, Kari
    WORLD ALLERGY ORGANIZATION JOURNAL, 2020, 13 (08):
  • [34] The evolution of oral immunotherapy for the treatment of peanut allergy
    Allen, K. J.
    O'Hehir, R. E.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2011, 41 (09): : 1172 - 1174
  • [35] Oral immunotherapy in severe peanut allergy in adults
    Heliovaara, E.
    Kukkonen, K.
    Hakulinen, A.
    Helin, T.
    Voutilainen, H.
    Pelkonen, A.
    Makela, M.
    Kauppi, P.
    ALLERGY, 2015, 70 : 180 - 181
  • [36] PATIENT AND CAREGIVER PERSPECTIVES ON TREATMENT WITH LICENCED PEANUT ALLERGY ORAL IMMUNOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE
    Forster, K.
    Lawrence, C.
    Shand, G.
    Tilles, S.
    Acaster, S.
    Donelson, S.
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 129 : S58 - S58
  • [37] Advances in the management of peanut allergy (oral immunotherapy and epicutaneous immunotherapy)
    Wang, Julie
    ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 41 (01) : 5 - 9
  • [38] Associations between clinical factors and clinical course in peanut oral immunotherapy
    Powell, E. A.
    Ali, A.
    Zolkipli, Z. Q.
    Ewan, P.
    Clark, A.
    ALLERGY, 2020, 75 : 610 - 610
  • [39] Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy induces eosinophilic esophagitis: three pediatric case reports
    Semancik, Eileen
    Sayej, Wael N.
    PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 27 (05) : 539 - 541
  • [40] Early age peanut oral immunotherapy is safe and effective at achieving desensitization in 27 pediatric patients with peanut allergy
    Hemler, Jonathan
    Minnicozzi, Samantha
    Carey, Anne
    Braden, Karen
    Boyd, Kelly
    PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 35 (11)