Bioinformatory-assisted analysis of next-generation sequencing data for precision medicine in pancreatic cancer

被引:18
|
作者
Malgerud, Linnea [1 ,2 ]
Lindberg, Johan [3 ]
Wirta, Valtteri [4 ]
Gustafsson-Liljefors, Maria [5 ]
Karimi, Masoud [5 ]
Moro, Carlos Fernandez [6 ]
Stecker, Katrin [7 ]
Picker, Alexander [7 ]
Huelsewig, Carolin [7 ]
Stein, Martin [7 ]
Bohnert, Regina [7 ]
Del Chiaro, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Haas, Stephan L. [1 ]
Heuchel, Rainer L. [2 ]
Permert, Johan [8 ]
Maeurer, Markus J. [9 ]
Brock, Stephan [7 ]
Verbeke, Caroline S. [6 ]
Engstrand, Lars [4 ]
Jackson, David B. [7 ]
Gronberg, Henrik [3 ]
Lohr, Johannes-Matthias [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Ctr Digest Dis, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci Intervent & Technol CLINTEC, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat MEB, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Microbiol Tumor & Cell Biol MTC, Sci Life Lab, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol Radiumhemmet, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Mol Hlth GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany
[8] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Innovat Off, Stockholm, Sweden
[9] Karolinska Inst, Dept Lab Med LABMED, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
bioinformatics; drug-drug interactions; evidence-based; NGS; pancreatic cancer; PHASE-II TRIAL; CLINICAL-TRIALS; NAB-PACLITAXEL; BREAST-CANCER; GEMCITABINE; PHARMACOGENOMICS; THERAPY; CHEMORESISTANCE; CAPECITABINE; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1002/1878-0261.12108
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a tumor with an extremely poor prognosis, predominantly as a result of chemotherapy resistance and numerous somatic mutations. Consequently, PDAC is a prime candidate for the use of sequencing to identify causative mutations, facilitating subsequent administration of targeted therapy. In a feasibility study, we retrospectively assessed the therapeutic recommendations of a novel, evidence-based software that analyzes next-generation sequencing (NGS) data using a large panel of pharmacogenomic biomarkers for efficacy and toxicity. Tissue from 14 patients with PDAC was sequenced using NGS with a 620 gene panel. FASTQ files were fed into TREATMENTMAP. The results were compared with chemotherapy in the patients, including all side effects. No changes in therapy were made. Known driver mutations for PDAC were confirmed (e.g. KRAS, TP53). Software analysis revealed positive biomarkers for predicted effective and ineffective treatments in all patients. At least one biomarker associated with increased toxicity could be detected in all patients. Patients had been receiving one of the currently approved chemotherapy agents. In two patients, toxicity could have been correctly predicted by the software analysis. The results suggest that NGS, in combination with an evidence-based software, could be conducted within a 2-week period, thus being feasible for clinical routine. Therapy recommendations were principally off-label use. Based on the predominant KRAS mutations, other drugs were predicted to be ineffective. The pharmacogenomic biomarkers indicative of increased toxicity could be retrospectively linked to reported negative side effects in the respective patients. Finally, the occurrence of somatic and germline mutations in cancer syndrome-associated genes is noteworthy, despite a high frequency of these particular variants in the background population. These results suggest software-analysis of NGS data provides evidence-based information on effective, ineffective and toxic drugs, potentially forming the basis for precision cancer medicine in PDAC.
引用
收藏
页码:1413 / 1429
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Applications and data analysis of next-generation sequencing
    Vogl, Ina
    Benet-Pages, Anna
    Eck, Sebastian H.
    Kuhn, Marius
    Vosberg, Sebastian
    Greif, Philipp A.
    Metzeler, Klaus H.
    Biskup, Saskia
    Mueller-Reible, Clemens
    Klein, Hanns-Georg
    LABORATORIUMSMEDIZIN-JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 37 (06): : 305 - 315
  • [32] Pathway analysis with next-generation sequencing data
    Zhao, Jinying
    Zhu, Yun
    Boerwinkle, Eric
    Xiong, Momiao
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2015, 23 (04) : 507 - 515
  • [33] Analysis of next-generation sequencing data for cancer genomes: challenges and pitfalls
    Wang, Jianmin
    Chen, Xiang
    Wu, Gang
    Rusch, Michael C.
    Parker, Matthew
    Lei, Wei
    Downing, James R.
    Zhang, Jinghui
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 72
  • [34] Analysis of Next-Generation Sequencing Data of miRNA for the Prediction of Breast Cancer
    Saha, Indrajit
    Bhowmick, Shib Sankar
    Geraci, Filippo
    Pellegrini, Marco
    Bhattacharjee, Debotosh
    Maulik, Ujjwal
    Plewczynski, Dariusz
    SWARM, EVOLUTIONARY, AND MEMETIC COMPUTING (SEMCCO 2015), 2016, 9873 : 116 - 127
  • [35] Next generation sequencing in cancer: opportunities and challenges for precision cancer medicine
    Paolillo, Carmela
    Londin, Eric
    Fortina, Paolo
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2016, 76 : S84 - S91
  • [36] Inherited Susceptibility to Pancreatic Cancer in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing
    Humphris, Jeremy
    Chang, David K.
    Biankin, Andrew V.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 148 (03) : 496 - +
  • [37] NGSNGS: next-generation simulator for next-generation sequencing data
    Henriksen, Rasmus Amund
    Zhao, Lei
    Korneliussen, Thorfinn Sand
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2023, 39 (01)
  • [38] Next-Generation Sequencing in Cancer
    S. Vinod Nair
    Gigi Madhulaxmi
    Ravindran Thomas
    Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2021, 20 : 340 - 344
  • [39] Next-Generation Sequencing in Cancer
    Nair, S. Vinod
    Madhulaxmi
    Thomas, Gigi
    Ankathil, Ravindran
    JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2021, 20 (03): : 340 - 344
  • [40] OptiType: precision HLA typing from next-generation sequencing data
    Szolek, Andras
    Schubert, Benjamin
    Mohr, Christopher
    Sturm, Marc
    Feldhahn, Magdalena
    Kohlbacher, Oliver
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2014, 30 (23) : 3310 - 3316