Bioinformatory-assisted analysis of next-generation sequencing data for precision medicine in pancreatic cancer

被引:18
|
作者
Malgerud, Linnea [1 ,2 ]
Lindberg, Johan [3 ]
Wirta, Valtteri [4 ]
Gustafsson-Liljefors, Maria [5 ]
Karimi, Masoud [5 ]
Moro, Carlos Fernandez [6 ]
Stecker, Katrin [7 ]
Picker, Alexander [7 ]
Huelsewig, Carolin [7 ]
Stein, Martin [7 ]
Bohnert, Regina [7 ]
Del Chiaro, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Haas, Stephan L. [1 ]
Heuchel, Rainer L. [2 ]
Permert, Johan [8 ]
Maeurer, Markus J. [9 ]
Brock, Stephan [7 ]
Verbeke, Caroline S. [6 ]
Engstrand, Lars [4 ]
Jackson, David B. [7 ]
Gronberg, Henrik [3 ]
Lohr, Johannes-Matthias [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Ctr Digest Dis, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci Intervent & Technol CLINTEC, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat MEB, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Microbiol Tumor & Cell Biol MTC, Sci Life Lab, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol Radiumhemmet, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Mol Hlth GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany
[8] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Innovat Off, Stockholm, Sweden
[9] Karolinska Inst, Dept Lab Med LABMED, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
bioinformatics; drug-drug interactions; evidence-based; NGS; pancreatic cancer; PHASE-II TRIAL; CLINICAL-TRIALS; NAB-PACLITAXEL; BREAST-CANCER; GEMCITABINE; PHARMACOGENOMICS; THERAPY; CHEMORESISTANCE; CAPECITABINE; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1002/1878-0261.12108
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a tumor with an extremely poor prognosis, predominantly as a result of chemotherapy resistance and numerous somatic mutations. Consequently, PDAC is a prime candidate for the use of sequencing to identify causative mutations, facilitating subsequent administration of targeted therapy. In a feasibility study, we retrospectively assessed the therapeutic recommendations of a novel, evidence-based software that analyzes next-generation sequencing (NGS) data using a large panel of pharmacogenomic biomarkers for efficacy and toxicity. Tissue from 14 patients with PDAC was sequenced using NGS with a 620 gene panel. FASTQ files were fed into TREATMENTMAP. The results were compared with chemotherapy in the patients, including all side effects. No changes in therapy were made. Known driver mutations for PDAC were confirmed (e.g. KRAS, TP53). Software analysis revealed positive biomarkers for predicted effective and ineffective treatments in all patients. At least one biomarker associated with increased toxicity could be detected in all patients. Patients had been receiving one of the currently approved chemotherapy agents. In two patients, toxicity could have been correctly predicted by the software analysis. The results suggest that NGS, in combination with an evidence-based software, could be conducted within a 2-week period, thus being feasible for clinical routine. Therapy recommendations were principally off-label use. Based on the predominant KRAS mutations, other drugs were predicted to be ineffective. The pharmacogenomic biomarkers indicative of increased toxicity could be retrospectively linked to reported negative side effects in the respective patients. Finally, the occurrence of somatic and germline mutations in cancer syndrome-associated genes is noteworthy, despite a high frequency of these particular variants in the background population. These results suggest software-analysis of NGS data provides evidence-based information on effective, ineffective and toxic drugs, potentially forming the basis for precision cancer medicine in PDAC.
引用
收藏
页码:1413 / 1429
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Precision medicine for cancer with next-generation functional diagnostics
    Adam A. Friedman
    Anthony Letai
    David E. Fisher
    Keith T. Flaherty
    Nature Reviews Cancer, 2015, 15 : 747 - 756
  • [22] Clinical implications of next-generation sequencing for cancer medicine
    Shuen, A.
    Foulkes, W. D.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (05) : 39 - 42
  • [23] Next-Generation Sequencing and Personalized Medicine for Brain Cancer
    Brandon H. Bergsneider
    Linda M. Liau
    Current Surgery Reports, 6 (12)
  • [24] Next-Generation Sequencing and Personalized Medicine for Brain Cancer
    Bergsneider, Brandon H.
    Liau, Linda M.
    CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS, 2018, 6 (12):
  • [25] Next-generation sequencing and empowering personalised cancer medicine
    McDermott, Ultan
    DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2015, 20 (12) : 1470 - 1475
  • [26] Precision medicine at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: clinical next-generation sequencing enabling next-generation targeted therapy trials
    Hyman, David M.
    Solit, David B.
    Arcilas, Maria E.
    Cheng, Donavan T.
    Sabbatini, Paul
    Baselga, Jose
    Berger, Michael F.
    Ladanyi, Marc
    DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2015, 20 (12) : 1422 - 1428
  • [27] The Role of Next-Generation Sequencing in Precision Medicine: A Review of Outcomes in Oncology
    Morash, Margaret
    Mitchell, Hannah
    Beltran, Himisha
    Elemento, Olivier
    Pathak, Jyotishman
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [28] Alignment of Short Reads: A Crucial Step for Application of Next-Generation Sequencing Data in Precision Medicine
    Ye, Hao
    Meehan, Joe
    Tong, Weida
    Hong, Huixiao
    PHARMACEUTICS, 2015, 7 (04) : 523 - 541
  • [29] Pathway analysis with next-generation sequencing data
    Jinying Zhao
    Yun Zhu
    Eric Boerwinkle
    Momiao Xiong
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2015, 23 : 507 - 515
  • [30] Focus on next-generation sequencing data analysis
    Rusk N.
    Nature Methods, 2009, 6 (Suppl 11) : S1 - S1