Translation and validation of the greek version of a questionnaire measuring patient views on participation in clinical trials

被引:2
|
作者
Karampatakis, Dimitrios [1 ]
Kakavouti-Doudos, Angeliki [1 ]
Oikonomidis, Panagiotis [1 ]
Voultsos, Polychronis [2 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Univ Eye Clin 1, Univ Campus, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
[2] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Lab Forens Med & Toxicol Med Law & Eth, Sch Med, Fac Hlth Sci, Univ Campus, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
关键词
Clinical trial participation; Questionnaire; scale; Barriers; Facilitators; Greece; Greek; PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS; AMERICAN PARTICIPATION; AFRICAN-AMERICANS; COEFFICIENT ALPHA; INFORMED-CONSENT; PHASE-I; CANCER; ATTITUDES; WILLINGNESS; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-021-07111-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The increasing number of clinical research opportunities requires increasing numbers of participants in clinical trials. However, it may become increasingly problematic, as protocols have become increasingly complex. Better understanding of patients' attitudes towards their potential participation in clinical trials is essential for developing effective clinical trial recruitment strategies. In Greece, limited research has been conducted on this topic so far. This study aims to contribute to filling this gap. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted. Purposive sampling was used to select participants. The Greek version of a recently developed questionnaire measuring patient views on participation in clinical trials, a 27-item scale distributed into four factors, was tested. In addition, participants were asked to provide information regarding their socio-demographics. A demographic comparison was conducted. Results The four-factor solution derived in our study consisted of the same 27 items and it was different from the six-factor solution that Arnetz et al. proposed. The factors risks and benefits, that consisted of 5 and 3 items respectively in the six-factor solution, were merged into one factor that consisted of 10 items in the four-factor solution. The four factors produced were Risks and benefits (ten items, alpha = 0,867), Patient's expectations (six items, alpha = 0.864), Patient's participation (five items, alpha = 0.827), and Cost and convenience (five items, alpha = 0,770). We found that demographic factors did not impact patients' opinions about clinical trials participation, except for gender. The participants reported as important for participating in clinical trial: receiving clear and adequate information (95,5 %) and being given the opportunity to ask questions (97,8 %), take part in discussions regarding their own treatment (94,6 %), and voice their concerns and opinions (91,1 %). As factors strongly associated with participants' willingness to participate in a clinical trial were reported: concerns about the risks of being in a clinical trial (87,5 %), the possible side effects of clinical trials (86,3 %), the type of treatment given in a clinical trial (83,7 %), and whether participation would improve their quality of life (QoL) (81,5 %). Conclusions The preliminary validation of the Greek version of the questionnaire measuring patient perceptions and expectations of participating in clinical trials demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability and could be further tested in larger samples. The findings that emerged from this study are in line with previous literature.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Translation and validation of the Greek chronic liver disease questionnaire
    Zoi Kollia
    Evridiki Patelarou
    Victoria Vivilaki
    Eleni Kollia
    Florentia Kefou
    Ioannis Elefsiniotis
    Spyros P Dourakis
    Hero Brokalaki
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2010, 16 (46) : 5838 - 5844
  • [22] Identifying dyspepsia in the Greek population: translation and validation of a questionnaire
    Anastasiou, F
    Antonakis, N
    Chaireti, G
    Theodorakis, PN
    Lionis, C
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 6 (1) : 6P
  • [23] Translation and validation of the questionnaire "Organizational Culture Profile" in Greek
    Galanis, P.
    Diamantidou, V.
    Kalokairinou, A.
    Velonaki, V.
    Kaitelidou, D.
    ARCHIVES OF HELLENIC MEDICINE, 2023, 40 (05): : 636 - 642
  • [24] Translation and validation of the Norwegian version of the Injustice Experience Questionnaire
    Ljosaa, Tone Marte
    Berg, Hanne Svardal
    Jacobsen, Henrik Borsting
    Granan, Lars-Petter
    Reme, Silje
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2022, 22 (01) : 77 - 87
  • [25] Translation and Validation of the Danish Version of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire
    Bouknaitir, Jamal Bech
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    Brorson, Stig
    Andersen, Mikkel osterheden
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 12 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [26] Translation and validation of the Hebrew version of the SHALOM Spiritual questionnaire
    Elhai, Nahum
    Carmel, Sara
    O'Rourke, Norm
    Bachner, Yaacov G.
    AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2018, 22 (01) : 46 - 52
  • [27] Translation and validation of the PACIC+ questionnaire: the Thai version
    Daniel Zeugfang
    Anawat Wisetborisut
    Chaisiri Angkurawaranon
    Apinun Aramrattana
    Michel Wensing
    Joachim Szecsenyi
    Katja Krug
    BMC Family Practice, 19
  • [28] Translation and validation of the PACIC plus questionnaire: the Thai version
    Zeugfang, Daniel
    Wisetborisut, Anawat
    Angkurawaranon, Chaisiri
    Aramrattana, Apinun
    Wensing, Michel
    Szecsenyi, Joachim
    Krug, Katja
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 19
  • [29] Translation and Validation of the Mongolian Version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire
    Parchaa, Tsetsegmaa
    Togoobaatar, Ganchimeg
    Fukuzawa, Rieko Kishi
    Chunagsuren, Badamkhand
    Tseleejav, Batbold
    Nyam, Naranbaatar
    Katsumata, Asako Takekuma
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [30] Translation and validation of the German version of the Young Spine Questionnaire
    Nyiro, Luana
    Potthoff, Tobias
    Siegenthaler, Mette Hobaek
    Riner, Fabienne
    Schweinhardt, Petra
    Wirth, Brigitte
    BMC PEDIATRICS, 2021, 21 (01)