Technical feasibility of personalized articulating knee joint distraction for treatment of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis

被引:4
|
作者
Struik, T. [1 ]
Jaspers, J. E. N. [2 ]
Besselink, N. J. [1 ]
van Roermund, P. M. [3 ]
Plomp, S. [4 ]
Rudert, M. J. [5 ]
Lafeber, F. P. J. G. [1 ]
Mastbergen, S. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Rheumatol & Clin Immunol, F02-127,POB 85500, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Med Technol & Clin Phys, C01-230,POB 85500, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Orthoped, G05-228,POB 85500, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Anat, STR-0-201,POB 85500, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Orthoped Biomech Lab, 2181 Westlawn Bldg, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
Joint distraction; Knee osteoarthritis; Joint specific; Personalized; Articulating; Biomechanical testing; ARTHROPLASTY DEVICE; REPLACEMENT; CARTILAGE; FORCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.08.002
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: Knee osteoarthritis is a highly prevalent degenerative joint disorder characterized by joint tissue damage and pain. Knee joint distraction has been introduced as a joint preserving surgical procedure to postpone knee arthroplasty. An often used standard externally fixation device for distraction poses a burden to patients due to the absence of joint flexion during the 6 weeks treatment. Therefore, a personalized articulating distraction device was developed. The aim of this study was to test technical feasibility of this device. Methods: Based on an often applied rigid device, using equal bone pin positions and connectors, a hinge mechanism was developed consisting of a cam-following system for reproducing the complex joint-specific knee kinematics. In support, a device was developed for capturing the joint-specific sagittal plane articulation. The obtained kinematic data were translated into joint-specific cam shapes that were installed bilaterally in the hinge mechanism of the distraction device, as such providing personalized knee motion. Distraction of 5 mm was performed within a range of motion of 30 deg. joint flexion. Pre-clinical evaluation of the working principle was performed on human cadaveric legs and system stiffness characteristics were biomechanically evaluated. Findings: The desired range of motion was obtained and distraction was maintained under physiologically representative loading. Moreover, the joint-specific approach demonstrated tolerance of deviations from anatomical and alignment origin during initial placement of the developed distraction device. Interpretation: Articulation during knee distraction is considered technically feasible and has potential to decrease burden and improve acceptance of distraction therapy. Testing of clinical feasibility is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 47
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Promising results of joint distraction in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis.
    VanValburg, AA
    vanMelkebeek, J
    VanRoermund, PM
    Lammens, J
    Verbout, AJ
    Lafeber, FPJG
    Bijlsma, JWJ
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1997, 40 (09): : 1507 - 1507
  • [42] Harnessing joint distraction for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a bibliometric and visualized analysis
    Peng, Liqing
    Li, Runmeng
    Xu, Shengxi
    Ding, Keyuan
    Wu, Yan
    Li, Hao
    Wang, Yong
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2023, 11
  • [43] Clinical benefit of joint distraction in the treatment of severe osteoarthritis of the ankle
    Marijnissen, ACA
    van Roermund, PM
    van Melkebeek, J
    Schenk, W
    Verbout, AJ
    Bijlsma, JWJ
    Lafeber, FPJG
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2002, 46 (11): : 2893 - 2902
  • [44] Clinical outcomes of knee joint distraction combined with marrow stimulation procedures for patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis
    Adachi, Nobuo
    Hayashi, Seiju
    Nakamae, Atsuo
    Ishikawa, Masakazu
    Kamei, Goki
    Ikuta, Yasunari
    Deie, Masataka
    Ochi, Mitsuo
    KNEE, 2021, 33 : 342 - 350
  • [45] TIBIOFEMORAL JOINT CONTACT DURING THE LOADING RESPONSE PHASE OF GAIT IN INDIVIDUALS WITH CONCURRENT KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS AND COMPLAINTS OF JOINT INSTABILITY
    Rainis, Carrie A.
    Farrokhi, Shawn
    Tashman, Scott
    Fitzgerald, G. Kelley
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME SUMMER BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 289 - 290
  • [46] Associations between the morphological parameters of proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) and changes in tibiofemoral joint structures in patients with knee osteoarthritis
    Jun Chang
    Tianyu Chen
    Yizhu Yan
    Zhaohua Zhu
    Weiyu Han
    Yi Zhao
    Benny Antony
    Anita Wluka
    Tania Winzenberg
    Flavia Cicuttini
    Changhai Ding
    Arthritis Research & Therapy, 24
  • [47] Associations between the morphological parameters of proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) and changes in tibiofemoral joint structures in patients with knee osteoarthritis
    Chang, Jun
    Chen, Tianyu
    Yan, Yizhu
    Zhu, Zhaohua
    Han, Weiyu
    Zhao, Yi
    Antony, Benny
    Wluka, Anita
    Winzenberg, Tania
    Cicuttini, Flavia
    Ding, Changhai
    ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2022, 24 (01)
  • [48] TISSUE STRUCTURE MODIFICATION IN END-STAGE KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS BY USE OF JOINT DISTRACTION
    Intema, F.
    Wiegant, K.
    van Roermund, P. M.
    Marijnissen, A. C.
    Cotofona, S.
    Felix, E.
    Mastbergen, S. M.
    Lafeber, F. P.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2010, 18 : S142 - S142
  • [49] Six weeks of continuous joint distraction appears sufficient for clinical benefit and cartilaginous tissue repair in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis
    van der Woude, J. A. D.
    van Heerwaarden, R. J.
    Spruijt, S.
    Eckstein, F.
    Maschek, S.
    van Roermund, P. M.
    Custers, R. J. H.
    van Spil, W. E.
    Mastbergen, S. C.
    Lafeber, F. P. J. G.
    KNEE, 2016, 23 (05): : 785 - 791
  • [50] Comparison of conventional standing knee radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging in assessing progression of tibiofemoral joint osteoarthritis
    Cicuttini, FM
    Hankin, J
    Jones, G
    Wluka, A
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2005, 13 (08) : 722 - 727