A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison

被引:7
|
作者
Arsenijevic, Jelena [1 ,2 ]
Groot, Wim [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tambor, Marzena [4 ]
Golinowska, Stanislawa [4 ]
Sowada, Christoph [4 ]
Pavlova, Milena [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, CAPHRI, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Top Inst Evidence Based Educ Res TIER, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Jagiellonian Univ, Coll Med, Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Econ & Social Secur,Fac Hlth Sci, Krakow, Poland
关键词
Health promotion; Older adults; Funding; Europe; CARE; PERSPECTIVE; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-016-1515-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Health promotion interventions for older adults are important as they can decrease the onset and evolution of diseases and thus can reduce the medical costs related to those diseases. However, there is no comparative evidence on how those interventions are funded in European countries. The aim of this study is to explore the funding of health promotion interventions in general and health promotion interventions for older adults in particular in European countries. Method: We use desk research to identify relevant sources of information such as official national documents, international databases and scientific articles. Fora descriptive overview on how health promotion is funded, we focus on three dimensions: who is funding health promotion, what are the contribution mechanisms and who are the collecting agents. In addition to general information on funding of health promotion, we explore how programs on health promotion for older population groups are funded. Results: There is a great diversity in funding of health promotion in European countries. Although public sources (tax and social health insurance revenues) are still most often used, other mechanisms of funding such as private donations or European funds are also common. Furthermore, there is no clear pattern in the funding of health promotion for different population groups. This is of particular importance for health promotion for older adults where information is limited across European countries. Conclusions: This study provides an overview of funding of health promotion interventions in European countries. The main obstacles for funding health promotion interventions are lack of information and the fragmentation in the funding of health promotion interventions for older adults.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Physicians' motivations to use mobile health monitoring: a cross-country comparison
    Okazaki, Shintaro
    Alberto Castaneda, Jose
    Sanz, Silvia
    Mukherji, Prokriti
    BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 36 (01) : 21 - 32
  • [32] A cross-country comparison of accommodation manager perspectives on online review manipulation
    Gossling, Stefan
    Zeiss, Harald
    Hall, C. Michael
    Martin-Rios, Carlos
    Ram, Yael
    Grotte, Ivar-Petter
    CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2019, 22 (14) : 1744 - 1763
  • [33] Descriptive Norms and eHealth Use Among Older Adults: A Cross-Country Comparative Study
    Wu, Qiaofei
    Ngien, Annabel
    Jiang, Shaohai
    HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2024, 39 (12) : 2971 - 2982
  • [34] Cross-Country Differences in Basal and Stress-Induced Cortisol Secretion in Older Adults
    Souza-Talarico, Juliana N.
    Plusquellec, Pierrich
    Lupien, Sonia J.
    Fiocco, Alexandra
    Suchecki, Deborah
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (08):
  • [35] A cross-country comparison of smoking and lung cancer mortality in young adults.
    Garcia, M.
    Thun, M.
    Jemal, A.
    Flanders, W. D.
    Ward, E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 165 (11) : S3 - S3
  • [36] Clustering of Cardiometabolic Risk Factors and Dementia Incidence in Older Adults: A Cross-Country Comparison in England, the United States, and China
    Kontari, Panagiota
    Fife-Schaw, Chris
    Smith, Kimberley
    JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 78 (06): : 1035 - 1044
  • [37] Original Study Older Adults' Reasons for Participating in an eHealth Prevention Trial: A Cross-Country, Mixed-Methods Comparison
    Coley, Nicola
    Rosenberg, Anna
    van Middelaar, Tessa
    Soulier, Alexandra
    Barbera, Mariagnese
    Guillemont, Juliette
    Steensma, Jaap
    Igier, Valerie
    Eskelinen, Marjo
    Soininen, Hilkka
    van Charante, Eric Moll
    Richard, Edo
    Kivipelto, Miia
    Andrieu, Sandrine
    Sindi, Shireen
    Solomon, Alina
    Hartmann, Tobias
    Brayne, Carol
    van Gool, Pim
    Beishuizen, Cathrien
    Jongstra, Susan
    van Wanrooij, Lennard
    Hoevenaar-Blom, Marieke
    Ngandu, Tiia
    Mangiasche, Francesca
    Meiller, Yannick
    van de Groep, Bram
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2019, 20 (07) : 843 - +
  • [38] Country size bias in global health: cross-country comparison of malaria policy and foreign aid
    Jezek, Tomas
    GLOBAL HEALTH RESEARCH AND POLICY, 2021, 6 (01)
  • [39] Country size bias in global health: cross-country comparison of malaria policy and foreign aid
    Tomas Jezek
    Global Health Research and Policy, 6
  • [40] The intergenerational correlation of employment in Europe: a cross-country analysis
    Gimenez-Nadal, Jose Ignacio
    Molina, Jose Alberto
    Velilla, Jorge
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2022, 29 (11) : 1022 - 1026