A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison

被引:7
|
作者
Arsenijevic, Jelena [1 ,2 ]
Groot, Wim [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tambor, Marzena [4 ]
Golinowska, Stanislawa [4 ]
Sowada, Christoph [4 ]
Pavlova, Milena [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, CAPHRI, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Hlth Med & Life Sci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Top Inst Evidence Based Educ Res TIER, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Jagiellonian Univ, Coll Med, Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Econ & Social Secur,Fac Hlth Sci, Krakow, Poland
关键词
Health promotion; Older adults; Funding; Europe; CARE; PERSPECTIVE; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-016-1515-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Health promotion interventions for older adults are important as they can decrease the onset and evolution of diseases and thus can reduce the medical costs related to those diseases. However, there is no comparative evidence on how those interventions are funded in European countries. The aim of this study is to explore the funding of health promotion interventions in general and health promotion interventions for older adults in particular in European countries. Method: We use desk research to identify relevant sources of information such as official national documents, international databases and scientific articles. Fora descriptive overview on how health promotion is funded, we focus on three dimensions: who is funding health promotion, what are the contribution mechanisms and who are the collecting agents. In addition to general information on funding of health promotion, we explore how programs on health promotion for older population groups are funded. Results: There is a great diversity in funding of health promotion in European countries. Although public sources (tax and social health insurance revenues) are still most often used, other mechanisms of funding such as private donations or European funds are also common. Furthermore, there is no clear pattern in the funding of health promotion for different population groups. This is of particular importance for health promotion for older adults where information is limited across European countries. Conclusions: This study provides an overview of funding of health promotion interventions in European countries. The main obstacles for funding health promotion interventions are lack of information and the fragmentation in the funding of health promotion interventions for older adults.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Production activities and economic dependency by age and gender in Europe: A cross-country comparison
    Hammer, Bernhard
    Prskawetz, Alexia
    Freund, Inga
    JOURNAL OF THE ECONOMICS OF AGEING, 2015, 5 : 86 - 97
  • [22] Human values, legal regulation, and approval of homosexuality in Europe: A cross-country comparison
    Kuntz, Anabel
    Davidov, Eldad
    Schwartz, Shalom H.
    Schmidt, Peter
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 45 (01) : 120 - 134
  • [23] A cross-country comparison of innovation efficiency
    Jiancheng Guan
    Kairui Zuo
    Scientometrics, 2014, 100 : 541 - 575
  • [24] Trust and deforestation: A cross-country comparison
    Murtazashvili, Ilia
    Murtazashvili, Jennifer
    Salahodjaev, Raufhon
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2019, 101 : 111 - 119
  • [25] A cross-country comparison of innovation efficiency
    Guan, Jiancheng
    Zuo, Kairui
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 100 (02) : 541 - 575
  • [26] Optimism and pessimism: A cross-country comparison
    Rehman, Fahd
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2020, 43 (11): : 3025 - 3038
  • [27] Effective GDP: A Cross-Country Comparison
    Rehman, Fand
    Cooper, Russel J.
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2023, 46 (03): : 619 - 652
  • [28] FUELWOOD CONSUMPTION - A CROSS-COUNTRY COMPARISON
    LAARMAN, JG
    WOHLGENANT, MK
    FOREST SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (02) : 383 - 392
  • [29] Health in China and India: A cross-country comparison in a context of rapid globalisation
    Dummer, Trevor J. B.
    Cook, Ian G.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2008, 67 (04) : 590 - 605
  • [30] Physicians’ motivations to use mobile health monitoring: a cross-country comparison
    Okazaki, Shintaro (shintaro.okazaki@kcl.ac.uk), 2017, Taylor and Francis Ltd. (36):