Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants

被引:789
|
作者
Friesen, LM [1 ]
Shannon, RV [1 ]
Baskent, D [1 ]
Wang, X [1 ]
机构
[1] House Ear Res Inst, Dept Auditory Implants & Percept, Los Angeles, CA 90057 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.1381538
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Speech recognition was measured as a function of spectral resolution (number of spectral channels) and speech-to-noise ratio in normal-hearing (NH) and cochlear-implant (CI) listeners. Vowel, consonant, word, and sentence recognition were measured in five normal -hearing listeners, ten listeners with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant, and nine listeners with the Advanced Bionics Clarion cochlear implant. Recognition was measured as a function of the number of spectral channels (noise bands or electrodes) at signal-to-noise ratios of + 15, + 10, +5, 0 dB, and in quiet. Performance with three different speech processing strategies (SPEAK, CIS, and SAS) was similar across all conditions, and improved as the number of electrodes increased (up to seven or eight) for all conditions. For all noise levels, vowel and consonant recognition with the SPEAK speech processor did not improve with more than seven electrodes, while for normal-hearing listeners, performance continued to increase up to at least 20 channels. Speech recognition on more difficult speech materials (word and sentence recognition) showed a marginally significant increase in Nucleus-22 listeners from seven to ten electrodes. The average implant score on all processing strategies was poorer than scores of NH listeners with similar processing. However, the best Cl scores were similar to the normal-hearing scores for that condition (up to seven channels). CI listeners with the highest performance level increased in performance as the number of electrodes increased up to seven, while CI listeners with low levels of speech recognition did not increase in performance as the number of electrodes was increased beyond four. These results quantity the effect of number of spectral channels on speech recognition in noise and demonstrate that most Cl subjects are not able to fully utilize the spectral information provided by the number of electrodes used in their implant. (C) 2001 Acoustical Society, of America.
引用
收藏
页码:1150 / 1163
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Evoked cortical activity and speech recognition as a function of the number of simulated cochlear implant channels
    Friesen, L. M.
    Tremblay, K. L.
    Rohila, N.
    Wright, R. A.
    Shannon, R. V.
    Baskent, D.
    Rubinstein, J. T.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 120 (04) : 776 - 782
  • [12] Word recognition by children listening to speech processed into a small number of channels: Data from normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants
    Dorman, MF
    Loizou, PC
    Kemp, LL
    Kirk, KI
    EAR AND HEARING, 2000, 21 (06): : 590 - 596
  • [13] Spectral contrast enhancement improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implants
    Nogueira, Waldo
    Rode, Thilo
    Buechner, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2016, 139 (02): : 728 - 739
  • [14] Speech Perception, Cognitive Function and the Role of Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants
    Meister, Hartmut
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2012, 17 : 10 - 12
  • [15] The impact of spectral and temporal processing on speech recognition in children with cochlear implants
    DeFreese, Andrea
    Camarata, Stephen
    Sunderhaus, Linsey
    Holder, Jourdan
    Berg, Katelyn
    Lighterink, Mackenzie
    Gifford, Rene
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [16] Speech Intonation and Melodic Contour Recognition in Children With Cochlear Implants and With Normal Hearing
    See, Rachel L.
    Driscoll, Virginia D.
    Gfeller, Kate
    Kliethermes, Stephanie
    Oleson, Jacob
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2013, 34 (03) : 490 - 498
  • [17] BETTER SPEECH RECOGNITION WITH COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
    WILSON, BS
    FINLEY, CC
    LAWSON, DT
    WOLFORD, RD
    EDDINGTON, DK
    RABINOWITZ, WM
    NATURE, 1991, 352 (6332) : 236 - 238
  • [18] Dichotic speech recognition with cochlear implants
    Wesarg, T.
    Arndt, S.
    Alballaa, A. S.
    Rauch, A-K
    Laszig, R.
    Aschendorff, A.
    Speck, I
    HNO, 2019, 67 (10) : 769 - 777
  • [19] Cochlear Implants or Hearing Aids: Speech Perception, Language, and Executive Function Outcomes
    Boerrigter, Merle Sanne
    Vermeulen, Anneke. M.
    Benard, Michel Ruben
    van Dijk, Hans. J. E.
    Marres, Henri A. M.
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    Langereis, Margreet C.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2023, 44 (02): : 411 - 422
  • [20] Basics of hearing theory and noise in cochlear implants
    Rattay, F
    CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2000, 11 (12) : 1875 - 1884