Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants

被引:789
|
作者
Friesen, LM [1 ]
Shannon, RV [1 ]
Baskent, D [1 ]
Wang, X [1 ]
机构
[1] House Ear Res Inst, Dept Auditory Implants & Percept, Los Angeles, CA 90057 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.1381538
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Speech recognition was measured as a function of spectral resolution (number of spectral channels) and speech-to-noise ratio in normal-hearing (NH) and cochlear-implant (CI) listeners. Vowel, consonant, word, and sentence recognition were measured in five normal -hearing listeners, ten listeners with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant, and nine listeners with the Advanced Bionics Clarion cochlear implant. Recognition was measured as a function of the number of spectral channels (noise bands or electrodes) at signal-to-noise ratios of + 15, + 10, +5, 0 dB, and in quiet. Performance with three different speech processing strategies (SPEAK, CIS, and SAS) was similar across all conditions, and improved as the number of electrodes increased (up to seven or eight) for all conditions. For all noise levels, vowel and consonant recognition with the SPEAK speech processor did not improve with more than seven electrodes, while for normal-hearing listeners, performance continued to increase up to at least 20 channels. Speech recognition on more difficult speech materials (word and sentence recognition) showed a marginally significant increase in Nucleus-22 listeners from seven to ten electrodes. The average implant score on all processing strategies was poorer than scores of NH listeners with similar processing. However, the best Cl scores were similar to the normal-hearing scores for that condition (up to seven channels). CI listeners with the highest performance level increased in performance as the number of electrodes increased up to seven, while CI listeners with low levels of speech recognition did not increase in performance as the number of electrodes was increased beyond four. These results quantity the effect of number of spectral channels on speech recognition in noise and demonstrate that most Cl subjects are not able to fully utilize the spectral information provided by the number of electrodes used in their implant. (C) 2001 Acoustical Society, of America.
引用
收藏
页码:1150 / 1163
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Speech recognition with cochlear implants as a function of the number of channels: Effects of electrode placement
    Berg, Katelyn A.
    Noble, Jack H.
    Dawant, Benoit M.
    Dwyer, Robert T.
    Labadie, Robert F.
    Gifford, Rene H.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 147 (05): : 3646 - 3656
  • [2] Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels
    Baskent, Deniz
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2006, 120 (05): : 2908 - 2925
  • [3] Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for normal-hearing listeners and patients with cochlear implants
    Dorman, MF
    Loizou, PC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 1997, 18 (06): : S113 - S114
  • [4] Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: Benefits of residual acoustic hearing
    Turner, CW
    Gantz, BJ
    Vidal, C
    Behrens, A
    Henry, BA
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2004, 115 (04): : 1729 - 1735
  • [5] Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: Benefits of residual acoustic hearing
    Turner, Christopher W.
    Gantz, Bruce J.
    Vidal, Corina
    Behrens, Amy
    Henry, Belinda A.
    1729, Acoustical Society of America (115):
  • [6] Advantages from bilateral hearing in speech perception in noise with simulated cochlear implants and residual acoustic hearing
    Schoof, Tim
    Green, Tim
    Faulkner, Andrew
    Rosen, Stuart
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2013, 133 (02): : 1017 - 1030
  • [7] Speech recognition as a function of the number of channels for pediatric cochlear implant recipients
    Gifford, Rene H.
    Sunderhaus, Linsey W.
    Holder, Jourdan T.
    Berg, Katelyn A.
    Dawant, Benoit M.
    Noble, Jack H.
    Perkins, Elizabeth
    Camarata, Stephen
    JASA EXPRESS LETTERS, 2022, 2 (09):
  • [8] Acoustic Cue Integration in Speech Intonation Recognition With Cochlear Implants
    Peng, Shu-Chen
    Chatterjee, Monita
    Lu, Nelson
    TRENDS IN AMPLIFICATION, 2012, 16 (02): : 67 - 82
  • [9] The recognition of time-compressed speech as a function of age in listeners with cochlear implants or normal hearing
    Tinnemore, Anna R.
    Montero, Lauren
    Gordon-Salant, Sandra
    Goupell, Matthew J.
    FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 14
  • [10] Evaluation of Speech Recognition in Noise with Cochlear Implants and Dynamic FM
    Wolfe, Jace
    Schafert, Erin C.
    Heldner, Benjamin
    Muelder, Hans
    Ward, Emily
    Vincent, Brandon
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2009, 20 (07) : 409 - 421