Optimal non-adaptive probabilistic group testing in general sparsity regimes

被引:5
|
作者
Bay, Wei Heng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Scarlett, Jonathan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Price, Eric [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Comp Sci, 15 Comp Dr, Singapore 117417, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Math, 10 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119076, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Inst Data Sci, 3 Res Link, Singapore 117602, Singapore
[4] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Comp Sci, 2317 Speedway, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
group testing; sparsity; information-theoretic limits; DEFECTIVE MEMBERS; BOUNDS;
D O I
10.1093/imaiai/iaab020
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
In this paper, we consider the problem of noiseless non-adaptive probabilistic group testing, in which the goal is high-probability recovery of the defective set. We show that in the case of n items among which k are defective, the smallest possible number of tests equals min{C(k,n)k log n, n} up to lower-order asymptotic terms, where C-k,C-n is a uniformly bounded constant (varying depending on the scaling of k with respect to n) with a simple explicit expression. The algorithmic upper bound follows from a minor adaptation of an existing analysis of the Definite Defectives algorithm, and the algorithm-independent lower bound builds on existing works for the regimes k <= n(1-Omega(1)) and k = circle minus(n). In sufficiently sparse regimes (including k = o(n/lg n)),our main result generalizes that of Coja-Oghlan et al. (2020) by avoiding the assumption k <= n(1-Omega(1)), whereas in sufficiently dense regimes (including k = omega(n/log n)), our main result shows that individual testing is asymptotically optimal for any non-zero target success probability, thus strengthening an existing result of Aldridge (2019, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 65, 2058-2061) in terms of both the error probability and the assumed scaling of k.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1053
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal Non-adaptive Tolerant Junta Testing via Local Estimators
    Nadimpalli, Shivam
    Patel, Shyamal
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 56TH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF COMPUTING, STOC 2024, 2024, : 1039 - 1050
  • [32] Using non-adaptive group testing to construct spy agent routes
    Kalogridis, Georgios
    Mitchell, Chris J.
    ARES 2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AVAILABILITY, SECURITY AND RELIABILITY, 2008, : 1013 - +
  • [33] Early detection for networking anomalies using Non-Adaptive Group Testing
    Bui, Thach V.
    Huynh, Chinh N.
    Nguyen, Thuc D.
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ICT CONVERGENCE (ICTC 2013): FUTURE CREATIVE CONVERGENCE TECHNOLOGIES FOR NEW ICT ECOSYSTEMS, 2013, : 984 - 987
  • [34] An Analysis on Non-Adaptive Group Testing based on Sparse Pooling Graphs
    Wadayama, Tadashi
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION THEORY PROCEEDINGS (ISIT), 2013, : 2681 - 2685
  • [35] NON-ADAPTIVE VARIATION AND GROUP SELECTION
    CLOUDSLE.JL
    SCIENCE PROGRESS, 1971, 59 (234) : 243 - +
  • [36] List-Decoding Separable Matrices for Non-Adaptive Combinatorial Group Testing
    Fan, Jinping
    Gu, Yujie
    Miao, Ying
    Yu, Zhebin
    2024 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION THEORY, ISIT 2024, 2024, : 3237 - 3242
  • [37] Constraining the number of positive responses in adaptive, non-adaptive, and two-stage group testing
    De Bonis, Annalisa
    JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION, 2016, 32 (04) : 1254 - 1287
  • [38] Noisy Non-Adaptive Group Testing: A (Near-)Definite Defectives Approach
    Scarlett, Jonathan
    Johnson, Oliver
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 2020, 66 (06) : 3775 - 3797
  • [39] Constraining the number of positive responses in adaptive, non-adaptive, and two-stage group testing
    Annalisa De Bonis
    Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 2016, 32 : 1254 - 1287
  • [40] Aggregate Message Authentication Code Capable of Non-Adaptive Group-Testing
    Hirose, Shoichi
    Shikata, Junji
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 216116 - 216126