Randomized Phase III and Extension Studies of Naldemedine in Patients With Opioid-Induced Constipation and Cancer

被引:93
|
作者
Katakami, Nobuyuki [1 ]
Harada, Toshiyuki [2 ]
Murata, Toru [3 ]
Shinozaki, Katsunori [4 ]
Tsutsumi, Masakazu [5 ]
Yokota, Takaaki [6 ]
Arai, Masatsugu [6 ]
Tada, Yukio [6 ]
Narabayashi, Masaru [7 ]
Boku, Narikazu [8 ]
机构
[1] Inst Biomed Res & Innovat Hosp, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[2] Japan Community Healthcare Org Hokkaido Hosp, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[3] Aichi Hosp, Okazaki, Aichi, Japan
[4] Hiroshima Prefectural Hosp, Hiroshima, Japan
[5] Hitachi Gen Hosp, Hitachi, Ibaraki, Japan
[6] Shionogi & Co Ltd, Osaka, Japan
[7] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Tokyo, Japan
[8] Natl Canc Ctr, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
PREVALENCE; NALOXEGOL; PAIN;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2017.73.0853
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a frequent and debilitating adverse effect (AE) of opioids-common analgesics for cancer pain. We investigated the efficacy and safety of a peripherally acting m-opioid receptor antagonist, naldemedine (S-297995), for OIC, specifically in patients with cancer. Patients and Methods This phase III trial consisted of a 2-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (COMPOSE-4) and an open-label, 12-week extension study (COMPOSE-5). In COMPOSE-4, eligible adults with OIC and cancer were randomly assigned on a 1: 1 basis to receive once-daily oral naldemedine 0.2 mg or placebo. The primary end point was the proportion of spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) responders (>= 3 SBMs/week and an increase of >= 1 SBM/week from baseline). The primary end point of COMPOSE-5 was safety. Results In COMPOSE-4, 193 eligible patients were randomly assigned to naldemedine (n = 97) or placebo (n = 96). The proportion of SBM responders in COMPOSE-4 was significantly greater with naldemedine than with placebo (71.1% [69 of 97 patients] v 34.4% [33 of 96 patients]; P < .0001). A greater change from baseline was observed with naldemedine than with placebo in the frequency of SBMs/week (5.16 v 1.54; P < .0001), SBMs with complete bowel evacuation/week (2.76 v 0.71; P < .0001), and SBMs without straining/week (3.85 v 1.17; P = .0005). In COMPOSE-4, more patients treated with naldemedine than with placebo reported treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) (44.3% [43 of 97 patients] v 26.0% [25 of 96 patients]; P = .01); in COMPOSE-5, 105 (80.2%) of 131 of patients reported TEAEs. Diarrhea was the most frequently reported TEAE in COMPOSE-4 (19.6% [19 of 97 patients] v 7.3% [seven of 96 patients] with naldemedine v placebo) and COMPOSE-5 (18.3% [24 of 131 patients] with naldemedine). Naldemedine was not associated with signs or symptoms of opioid withdrawal and had no notable impact on opioid-mediated analgesia. Conclusion Once-daily oral naldemedine 0.2 mg effectively treated OIC and was generally well tolerated in patients with OIC and cancer. (C) 2017 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:3859 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Post-marketing surveillance of the safety and effectiveness of naldemedine in the management of opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer pain in Japan
    Takata, Keiko
    Nakazawa, Masami
    Honda, Keiichi
    Hashimoto, Sayo
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (05) : 3943 - 3954
  • [42] Analysis of opioid-mediated analgesia in Phase III studies of methylnaltrexone for opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain
    Webster, Lynn R.
    Brenner, Darren M.
    Barrett, Andrew C.
    Paterson, Craig
    Bortey, Enoch
    Forbes, William P.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2015, 8 : 771 - 780
  • [43] Preventive effect of naldemedine for opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer starting opioids: A multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.
    Hamano, Jun
    Higashibata, Takahiro
    Kessoku, Takaomi
    Kajiura, Shinya
    Hirakawa, Mami
    Ariyoshi, Keisuke
    Oyamada, Shunsuke
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (17_SUPPL) : LBA12014 - LBA12014
  • [44] Effects of Electroacupuncture for Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients With Cancer in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Wang, Weiming
    Liu, Yan
    Yang, Xiaofang
    Sun, Jianhua
    Yue, Zenghui
    Lu, Dianrong
    Zhou, Kehua
    Sun, Yuanjie
    Hou, Aihua
    Zang, Zhiwei
    Jin, Xiaoqing
    Liu, Chao
    Wang, Yuhang
    Yu, Jinna
    Zhu, Lili
    Liu, Zhishun
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (02) : E230310
  • [45] A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate Naldemedine for the Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients With Chronic Non-Cancer Pain
    Webster, Lynn Roy
    Yamada, Tadaaki
    Ferreira, Juan Camilo Arjona
    Davidson, Jennifer
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 148 (04) : S1194 - S1194
  • [46] Post-marketing surveillance of the safety and effectiveness of naldemedine in the management of opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer pain in Japan Response
    Koczwara, Bogda
    Deckx, Laura
    Ullah, Shahid
    van den Akker, Marjan
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (03) : 1897 - 1897
  • [47] Opioid-induced constipation
    Plaisance, L
    Ellis, JA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2002, 102 (03) : 72 - 73
  • [48] Opioid-induced Constipation
    Vallerand, April Hazard
    JNP-JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2017, 13 (02): : 170 - 174
  • [49] Opioid-induced constipation
    Gyawali, Bishal
    Hayashi, Naomi
    Tsukuura, Hiroaki
    Honda, Kazunori
    Shimokata, Tomoya
    Ando, Yuichi
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 50 (11) : 1331 - 1338
  • [50] Management of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Cancer Patients Focus on Methylnaltrexone
    Gatti, Antonio
    Sabato, Alessandro Fabrizio
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2012, 32 (05) : 293 - 301