Randomized Phase III and Extension Studies of Naldemedine in Patients With Opioid-Induced Constipation and Cancer

被引:93
|
作者
Katakami, Nobuyuki [1 ]
Harada, Toshiyuki [2 ]
Murata, Toru [3 ]
Shinozaki, Katsunori [4 ]
Tsutsumi, Masakazu [5 ]
Yokota, Takaaki [6 ]
Arai, Masatsugu [6 ]
Tada, Yukio [6 ]
Narabayashi, Masaru [7 ]
Boku, Narikazu [8 ]
机构
[1] Inst Biomed Res & Innovat Hosp, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[2] Japan Community Healthcare Org Hokkaido Hosp, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
[3] Aichi Hosp, Okazaki, Aichi, Japan
[4] Hiroshima Prefectural Hosp, Hiroshima, Japan
[5] Hitachi Gen Hosp, Hitachi, Ibaraki, Japan
[6] Shionogi & Co Ltd, Osaka, Japan
[7] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Tokyo, Japan
[8] Natl Canc Ctr, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
PREVALENCE; NALOXEGOL; PAIN;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2017.73.0853
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a frequent and debilitating adverse effect (AE) of opioids-common analgesics for cancer pain. We investigated the efficacy and safety of a peripherally acting m-opioid receptor antagonist, naldemedine (S-297995), for OIC, specifically in patients with cancer. Patients and Methods This phase III trial consisted of a 2-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (COMPOSE-4) and an open-label, 12-week extension study (COMPOSE-5). In COMPOSE-4, eligible adults with OIC and cancer were randomly assigned on a 1: 1 basis to receive once-daily oral naldemedine 0.2 mg or placebo. The primary end point was the proportion of spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) responders (>= 3 SBMs/week and an increase of >= 1 SBM/week from baseline). The primary end point of COMPOSE-5 was safety. Results In COMPOSE-4, 193 eligible patients were randomly assigned to naldemedine (n = 97) or placebo (n = 96). The proportion of SBM responders in COMPOSE-4 was significantly greater with naldemedine than with placebo (71.1% [69 of 97 patients] v 34.4% [33 of 96 patients]; P < .0001). A greater change from baseline was observed with naldemedine than with placebo in the frequency of SBMs/week (5.16 v 1.54; P < .0001), SBMs with complete bowel evacuation/week (2.76 v 0.71; P < .0001), and SBMs without straining/week (3.85 v 1.17; P = .0005). In COMPOSE-4, more patients treated with naldemedine than with placebo reported treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) (44.3% [43 of 97 patients] v 26.0% [25 of 96 patients]; P = .01); in COMPOSE-5, 105 (80.2%) of 131 of patients reported TEAEs. Diarrhea was the most frequently reported TEAE in COMPOSE-4 (19.6% [19 of 97 patients] v 7.3% [seven of 96 patients] with naldemedine v placebo) and COMPOSE-5 (18.3% [24 of 131 patients] with naldemedine). Naldemedine was not associated with signs or symptoms of opioid withdrawal and had no notable impact on opioid-mediated analgesia. Conclusion Once-daily oral naldemedine 0.2 mg effectively treated OIC and was generally well tolerated in patients with OIC and cancer. (C) 2017 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:3859 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy of Naldemedine for the Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation: A Meta-Analysis
    Esmadi, Mohammad
    Ahmad, Dina
    Hewlett, Alexander
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 : S64 - S64
  • [32] Opioid-Induced Constipation in Advanced Cancer Patients
    ALMouaalamy, Nabil
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (04)
  • [33] Naldemedine versus placebo in opioid-induced constipation: a meta-analysis
    Wobbe, Bastian
    Gerner, Maximilian
    Koehne, Claus-Henning
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2023, 13 (E3) : e578 - e584
  • [34] Efficacy of Naldemedine for the Treatment of Opioid-Induced Constipation: A Meta-Analysis
    Esmadi, Mohammad
    Ahmad, Dina
    Hewlett, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL AND LIVER DISEASES, 2019, 28 (01) : 41 - 46
  • [35] Naldemedine for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation in adults with chronic noncancer pain
    Liu, Joy J.
    Quinton, Sarah E.
    Brenner, Darren M.
    PAIN MANAGEMENT, 2020, 10 (05) : 301 - 306
  • [37] A phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate naldemedine for the treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients with cancer pain
    Boku, Narikazu
    Katakami, Nobuyuki
    Fujita, Shiro
    Oda, Koji
    Tauchi, Katsunori
    Nakata, Ken
    Shinozaki, Katsunori
    Okuno, Motoyasu
    Kawai, Yasukazu
    Kikukawa, Hiroaki
    Suzuki, Ryujiro
    Nakazawa, Hideo
    Kojima, Hiroshi
    Mizutani, Mitsuhiro
    Hara, Toru
    Yokota, Takaaki
    Suzuki, Yura
    Narabayashi, Masaru
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [38] Post-marketing surveillance of the safety and effectiveness of naldemedine in the management of opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer pain in Japan
    Keiko Takata
    Masami Nakazawa
    Keiichi Honda
    Sayo Hashimoto
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 3943 - 3954
  • [39] Methylnaltrexone treatment of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients
    Karver, S. B.
    Slatkin, N. E.
    Thomas, J.
    Israel, R. J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [40] Efficacy and Safety of Naldemedine for Patients with Cancer with Opioid-Induced Constipation in Clinical Practice: A Real-World Retrospective Study
    Nishiba, Hiromi
    Imai, Hisao
    Fujita, Yukiyoshi
    Hiruta, Eriko
    Masuno, Takashi
    Yamazaki, Shigeki
    Tanaka, Hajime
    Kamiya, Teruhiko
    Ito, Masako
    Takei, Satoshi
    Matsuura, Masato
    Mogi, Junnosuke
    Minato, Koichi
    Obayashi, Kyoko
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (09)