Reliability and validity of ankle proprioceptive measures

被引:83
|
作者
Deshpande, N
Connelly, DM
Culham, EG [1 ]
Costigan, PA
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Sch Rehabil Therapy, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Sch Phys & Hlth Educ, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Waterloo, Dept Kinesiol, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2003年 / 84卷 / 06期
关键词
aging; ankle; proprioception; rehabilitation; reproducibility of results;
D O I
10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00016-9
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the reliability and validity of ankle proprioceptive measures. Design: Reliability was assessed between test occasions. Construct validity was addressed by the ability of measures to differentiate among groups. Setting: Laboratory of an educational institution. Participants: Eight healthy adults were recruited into each of 3 groups: (1) young (20-39y), (2) middle-aged (40-59y), and (3) older adults (greater than or equal to60y). Four subjects from each group (n=12) participated in retesting. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Threshold for perception of passive movement, error in active reproduction of position, error in reproduction of velocity, and error in reproduction of torque. Results: Intersession reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] range, .79-.95) for threshold for perception of movement, error in active reproduction, error in velocity reproduction, and error in dorsiflexion torque reproduction; intersession reliability was good for error in reproduction of plantarflexion torque (ICC=.72). Threshold for perception of movement differed between groups 1 and 3 and between groups 2 and 3 (P<.05). Error in reproduction of position was greater in group 2 than in group 1 (P<.05). Conclusion: Differences in proprioception between the older and the 2 younger groups were best detected by using threshold for perception of passive movement. (C) 2003 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 889
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reliability and Validity of Korean Version Ankle Instability Instrument and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure
    Kim, Jin Ah
    Ha, Sangmin
    Kang, Taekyu
    Lee, Sae Yong
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2016, 48 (05): : 783 - 783
  • [43] Proprioceptive training for ankle instability
    Hanney, WJ
    STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING JOURNAL, 2000, 22 (05) : 63 - 68
  • [44] Testing the validity of surgical outcome measures for the foot and ankle.
    Samimi, D
    Vyas, R
    Soohoo, N
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 53 (01) : S163 - S163
  • [45] Reliability and validity of current physical examination techniques of the foot and ankle
    Wrobel, James S.
    Armstrong, David G.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 98 (03) : 197 - 206
  • [46] The reliability and validity of a digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool
    Rosen, Adam B.
    Johnston, Madison
    Chung, Sunghoon
    Burcal, Christopher J.
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 43 (12) : 1738 - 1741
  • [47] The Oxford ankle foot questionnaire for children SCALING, RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY
    Morris, C.
    Doll, H. A.
    Wainwright, A.
    Theologis, T.
    Fitzpatrick, R.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2008, 90B (11): : 1451 - 1456
  • [48] A New Device for Assessing Ankle Dorsiflexion Motion: Reliability and Validity
    Wilken, Jason
    Rao, Smita
    Estin, Miriam
    Saltzman, Charles
    Yack, H. John
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 41 (04): : 274 - 279
  • [49] Validity and reliability of a Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure
    Hanneke Weel
    Ruben Zwiers
    Donija Azim
    Inger N. Sierevelt
    Daniel Haverkamp
    C. Niek van Dijk
    Gino M. M. J. Kerkhoffs
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2016, 24 : 1348 - 1354
  • [50] The cumberland ankle instability tool: A report of validity and reliability testing
    Hiller, Claire E.
    Refshauge, Kathryn M.
    Bundy, Anita C.
    Herbert, Rob D.
    Kilbreath, Sharon L.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2006, 87 (09): : 1235 - 1241