Reliability and validity of ankle proprioceptive measures

被引:83
|
作者
Deshpande, N
Connelly, DM
Culham, EG [1 ]
Costigan, PA
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Sch Rehabil Therapy, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Sch Phys & Hlth Educ, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Waterloo, Dept Kinesiol, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2003年 / 84卷 / 06期
关键词
aging; ankle; proprioception; rehabilitation; reproducibility of results;
D O I
10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00016-9
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the reliability and validity of ankle proprioceptive measures. Design: Reliability was assessed between test occasions. Construct validity was addressed by the ability of measures to differentiate among groups. Setting: Laboratory of an educational institution. Participants: Eight healthy adults were recruited into each of 3 groups: (1) young (20-39y), (2) middle-aged (40-59y), and (3) older adults (greater than or equal to60y). Four subjects from each group (n=12) participated in retesting. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Threshold for perception of passive movement, error in active reproduction of position, error in reproduction of velocity, and error in reproduction of torque. Results: Intersession reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] range, .79-.95) for threshold for perception of movement, error in active reproduction, error in velocity reproduction, and error in dorsiflexion torque reproduction; intersession reliability was good for error in reproduction of plantarflexion torque (ICC=.72). Threshold for perception of movement differed between groups 1 and 3 and between groups 2 and 3 (P<.05). Error in reproduction of position was greater in group 2 than in group 1 (P<.05). Conclusion: Differences in proprioception between the older and the 2 younger groups were best detected by using threshold for perception of passive movement. (C) 2003 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 889
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF CERTAIN MEASURES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS
    CAPRETTA, PJ
    BERKUN, MM
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1962, 10 (03) : 875 - 878
  • [32] Reliability and validity of eye movement measures of reading
    不详
    ANNEE PSYCHOLOGIQUE, 1936, 37 : 632 - 632
  • [33] Reliability and validity of an instrument that measures perceptions of corruption
    Garcia Lirios, Cruz
    Carreon Guillen, Javier
    Hernandez Valdes, Jorge
    Aguilar Fuentes, Jose Alfonso
    Rosas Ferrusca, Francisco Javier
    Morales Flores, Maria de Lourdes
    Garcia Estrada, Erle
    REVISTA PENSAMIENTO AMERICANO, 2015, 8 (15): : 108 - 120
  • [34] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF AN INSTRUMENT THAT MEASURES HEALTH WELFARE
    Jose Garcia-Ochoa, Juan
    de los Angeles Delgado-Carrillo, Maria
    Garcia-Lirios, Cruz
    EUREKA-REVISTA CIENTIFICA DE PSICOLOGIA, 2018, 15 (02): : 244 - 252
  • [35] Reliability and validity of three cultural competency measures
    Ho, Ming-Jung
    Lee, Keng-Lin
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 41 (05) : 519 - 519
  • [37] The interday reliability of leg and ankle musculotendinous stiffness measures
    McLachlan, Ken A.
    Murphy, Aron J.
    Watsford, Mark L.
    Rees, Sven
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2006, 22 (04) : 296 - 304
  • [38] The interday reliability of leg and ankle musculotendinous stiffness measures
    McLachlan, Ken A.
    Murphy, Aron J.
    Watsford, Mark L.
    Rees, Sven
    Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 2006, 22 (04): : 296 - 304
  • [39] RELIABILITY OF THREE MEASURES OF ANKLE DORSIFLEXION RANGE OF MOTION
    Konor, Megan M.
    Morton, Sam
    Eckerson, Joan M.
    Grindstaff, Terry L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2012, 7 (03): : 279 - 287
  • [40] Reliability and discriminative validity of sudden ankle inversion measurements in patients with chronic ankle instability
    Eechaute, Christophe
    Vaes, Peter
    Duquet, William
    Van Gheluwe, Bart
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2009, 30 (01) : 82 - 86